flyingvee wrote:
By the way. The Cavs just released LeBron. Otis says we don't need him.
hysterical... at this point who knows..
Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass
taruky1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
If Hedo Turkoglu ever publicly said one of his goals was to become a billionaire, I'd rip him too. It really all boils down to how sick society is that we idolize people who are entertainers (Hollywood or sports), when they really do little to nothing for society. The peanuts they give back are more than offset by the wasted time and money society gives to them. It's kind of like an addictive drug, you start using it and THEN you need it.
So how exactly does $1 billion improve LeBron's or ANYONE's life any more than $500 million? Just to say "Hey, I've got a billion"? So is he going to work extra hard endorsing products kids can't afford or shouldn't be consuming because it's not good for them? Step back for a moment and look at the absurdity of it.
I realize that the greed is on all levels in sports, not just the athletes. But LeBron's statement is beyond wanting to live comfortbaly, it says that money is the end-all in life. And to me, that is shallow.
DrunkOnMystery wrote:I work in the entertainment industry. I'd like to be a billionaire. I'd go so far as to say it's a goal I have, albeit one I have no hope of ever achieving. Why do you think I should have to apologize for that?
N4U|Redux wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
You really think you'll ever accomplish anything worth being a billionaire over by being in entertainment? I'd love to hear you characterize this...
DrunkOnMystery wrote:You're missing the point. The point isn't whether or not anything I'll ever do is worth a billion dollars. Placing value on something intangible is purely subjective, and I frankly don't want to argue over a monetary value of nonsense like "a child's laughter", since that's the sort of thing entertainment provides.
My point is that wanting to be successful isn't wrong. And if LeBron's idea of success is being a billionaire, good for him. It'll be interesting to see what he does to achieve that goal.
DrunkOnMystery wrote:Any service is valued at what someone is willing to pay you to do it. If someone offered you a billion dollars to do 10 jumping jacks, would you be greedy for doing them? Of course not. You'd be insane not to.
Now imagine someone said: "Pick a number between 1 and a billion. I'll give you that many dollars to do 10 jumping jacks." Are you still greedy for choosing a billion and then doing them?
Was Lebron's quote in poor taste? Perhaps. But I still fail to see why Lebron should be looked down on, much less punished, for thinking he should get paid X amount for his total work. Especially when compared to other "superstar" athletes. If anything, I'm happy he said it honestly. I want to be the first billionaire athlete. Not: "I need to feed my family".
And while Carnegie, and to a lesser extent Rockefeller, did give money to charities, men like Gould who took over the railroad industry during the same period of time, didn't. And to be perfectly blunt, I don't care that he didn't.
But here's a question that I'm serious about: If Lebron said on tv tomorrow: "I want to be a billionaire athlete, but I'm going to give $100m of that to charity", would he still be greedy? What if he said $500m?
DrunkOnMystery wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I can only assume you live in a modest home with just the bare essentials needed to survive, and you give the rest of your money to charity?
But I think the real question here is: What compulsion does LeBron, or anyone else on the planet, have that would demand he give up money that he had the potential to make because you thought it was unfair?
I work in the entertainment industry. I'd like to be a billionaire. I'd go so far as to say it's a goal I have, albeit one I have no hope of ever achieving. Why do you think I should have to apologize for that?
DrunkOnMystery wrote:Your argument seems to lean towards: "Athletes make too much money because they don't benefit society as a whole." That's fine to say, but the same can be said for countless industries. Should they all be shut down because they don't benefit society?
We can agree to disagree, but I think it's an important point to note that if a shoe company pays Lebron 50 million dollars to endorse their shoes, and that company turns a 200 million dollar profit as a result, Lebron has done his job. He just hasn't done a job you feel is worth doing.
N4U|Redux wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Going from 50 million to 1 billion is a giant leap, which is where my problem lies. I specifically said if he makes normal athlete money I'd be cool with it, hell, even if he makes Jordan-esque money which is in the hundred's of millions it's cool with me. But, a billion? Hell, even a number like 250 million is reallllllly far from a billion. There's a reason no athlete in history has (apparently) made this much -- why is Lebron's ego so big that he feels he should or even, can, accomplish it?
On other industries doing it -- if they gloat openly about it, then it'll annoy me too. Lebron's waving his ego around on a big pole for all to see with statements like these.
DrunkOnMystery wrote:Ok, but supposing Lebron endorses a dozen different products at 50 million each? That, combined with the amount he'll make as a player in his career, and all of a sudden he's not too far off(relatively).
Although I think someone mentioned it earlier, and it's absolutely true: Lebron is going to have to make an insane amount very quickly if he's going to beat Tiger Woods to a billion.
N4U|Redux wrote:Doesn't really matter how much money they give back, there is no logical reason that Lebron makes so much more money than a guy like the president (even if he is a moron).
bucsmagicfan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Cant that be said about pretty much every professional athlete? For example, I'm pretty sure the NBA league minumum is more than the president's salary.