TheRevTy wrote:Ah, the old "you're a loser because you're on an internet message board and I'm not a loser because I suddenly have things to do despite the fact that the majority of the posts I make are novel-length" routine. Nice come back. Way to keep it classy and intelligent.
Ah the junior expectation Fan status rises from out of hiding.
1. If you are Rev at all you should be above putting words in people mouth. When I went to college I had lots of free time. I didn't think then I was a loser, dont think I was now and I never called anyone a loser. I take it you were joking about really being a reverend. Lutheran spiritual leaders are made of better stuff. Not too classy there at all.
2. You've revealed your bias because you obviously have been following this debate and choose only to respond when what you consider offensive is uttered by someone whose opinion of the Magic you do not agree. Simply not credible that anyone following this conversation would find only at this point something to object to and that only with the one whose opinion does not match your own of Shard. You tried to float a level of objectivity which clearly you do not possess. Not open and honest at all. WHy does your side always call only for classiness or civility when its the person whose opinion you don't agree with on focus. Makes you much of a hypocrite not to have your moral compass set all the time.
3. I really can't think why someone would put their post count into a thread if not to impress based on the the count or because they are impressed by it. To answer your nonsense I can tell you that its not the first time and probably won't be the last that a forum poster on these boards makes reference to his tenure or post count of his cronies to back up a point so it s fair game to break down what a post count really means. this is a forum on sports. I certainly hope he uses free time.
