Dwights ranking in the Playoffs

Sgaking · Post #1 » by **Sgaking** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 1:51 pm

Dwight has been ranked 13th best player in the playoffs

http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wireta ... _playoffs/

Do you think thats right?

1eyedjake · Post #2 » by **1eyedjake** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 1:57 pm

I think total minutes or games played was a factor in these rankings.

MagicFan149 · Post #3 » by **MagicFan149** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 2:20 pm

in fica per 40 mins he is like 3rd or 4th... but like 1eyedjake said it did have to do with total mins if im not mistaken.... anyways we watched the playoffs and dwight was one of the biggest performers night in and night out.... im already ready for next year

mhectorgato · Post #4 » by **mhectorgato** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 2:34 pm

MagicFan149 wrote:in fica per 40 mins he is like 3rd or 4th... but like 1eyedjake said it did have to do with total mins if im not mistaken.... anyways we watched the playoffs and dwight was one of the biggest performers night in and night out.... im already ready for next year

If they were using fica, then Shard would be a top 5 ranked player.

CPBalla2003 n da 863 · Post #5 » by **CPBalla2003 n da 863** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 4:36 pm

It sounds just about right, that Toronto Series, he was top five, he kind of disappeared in a couple games in the Detriot series, so 13th is just about right

Magic.City.23. · Post #6 » by **Magic.City.23.** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 6:36 pm

No way Rondo or Odom were better performers then DWill or Dwight! Kobe should be @ #1 imo, then DWill and Dwight should at least be @ #9 & 10 if we're talking soley about individual playoff performance and impact.......period. Just becuz one team goes further doesnt mean their 3rd/4th wheels are better than a losing teams best performer.....that list is garbage. If Dwill played for Boston, they probably would not have lost a playoff game yet......If Rondo played for Utah, the Jazz would probably be in the middle of the lottery......Stuckey has been a better impact performer then even Rondo has......I give that list an "F"

Logicjbr · Post #7 » by **Logicjbr** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 11:10 pm

I would say between 10 & 13 is about right.....maybe even 9th...he did have 3 20/20 games...

ProfX · Post #8 » by **ProfX** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 11:16 pm

He should have been 11

macdalejax · Post #9 » by **macdalejax** » Wed Jun 4, 2008 12:30 am

Looked about right to me

drsd · Post #10 » by **drsd** » Wed Jun 4, 2008 4:46 am

Howard had games were he hurt the team. FT shooting and TOs. He should not be ranked in the top five. But those 20/20 's looked nice!

Magic.City.23. · Post #11 » by **Magic.City.23.** » Wed Jun 4, 2008 5:58 am

But Rondo ahead of him.............

NEM · Post #12 » by **NEM** » Wed Jun 4, 2008 6:50 am

too low for me, i was thinking 8-11