ImageImageImageImage

The Case Against Frank Vogel

Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass

darthmerrick
Starter
Posts: 2,091
And1: 329
Joined: Apr 22, 2009
Location: Stafford, Virginia
         

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#41 » by darthmerrick » Sun Dec 24, 2017 3:30 pm

I'm conflicted on Vogel. The injuries aren't his fault, but we also know he can't coach his way out of a paper bag.

So do we let him finish out the year and get a high draft pick, or do we fire him now -- and than go with an interim coach the rest of the year and play the young guys.
craig01
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,958
And1: 483
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#42 » by craig01 » Sun Dec 24, 2017 4:21 pm

Jmo, but with all of the roster changes and injuries that have taken place it would seem prudent to just let this miserable season ride itself out.

I'm not impressed with Vogel up to now, but it would not be fair to pass judgment on his performance with having an incomplete and broken roster.
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
OrlandoDream
General Manager
Posts: 8,021
And1: 6,242
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
Location: Altamonte Springs Fl
 

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#43 » by OrlandoDream » Sun Dec 24, 2017 4:48 pm

Vogel is far from perfect. His rotations and substitution alone make me miss Brian Hill sometimes but let's be real. Not even Pop himself could come in and squeeze a win out of this garbage roster. Also the fact that ALL our starters are injured and out just tells me more and more to embrace the tank! I don't consider Elfrid a starter. These are his last game in Orlando and I see the new FO putting a big emphasis on upgrading our PG rotation through trades or draft.
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,836
And1: 5,474
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#44 » by fendilim » Sun Dec 24, 2017 10:34 pm

It would be really difficult to judge Voge this season.

I do think he has to play the youth more. With the season going nowhere.
Image
User avatar
Last Guardian
RealGM
Posts: 27,046
And1: 4,284
Joined: Feb 22, 2004
Location: New Jersey
 

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#45 » by Last Guardian » Mon Dec 25, 2017 4:28 pm

I was under the impression he was a great player development coach. Really, he's just a motivational coach who doesn't know x's and o's. He doesn't adjust, he plays some horrid lineups. And as a motivational coach..he can't get his team to play hard. He doesn't really have a lot going for him.

You may get dealt a crappy hand and not have a lot of talent, but you can make the best of what you've got. That said, its not so bad, we may be the worst team this year and get the #1 pick.
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,514
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#46 » by Skin » Mon Dec 25, 2017 7:18 pm

Give me a coach that wants to develop our real assets. Gordon and Isaac. That's all that matters.

Vogel is obviously not interested in doing that. He wants to "win as a team" and he's actually delusional enough to think that this team can do that. Fire his ass.
User avatar
UCFJayBird
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 27,235
And1: 3,648
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:
     

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#47 » by UCFJayBird » Tue Dec 26, 2017 4:26 pm

Last Guardian wrote:I was under the impression he was a great player development coach. Really, he's just a motivational coach who doesn't know x's and o's. He doesn't adjust, he plays some horrid lineups. And as a motivational coach..he can't get his team to play hard. He doesn't really have a lot going for him.

You may get dealt a crappy hand and not have a lot of talent, but you can make the best of what you've got. That said, its not so bad, we may be the worst team this year and get the #1 pick.


To be fair Gordon is having his breakout year, Elfrid's percentages are up (except FTs), and Mario has actually been productive this month.

So in terms of player development not sure he's not doing it.

Put me in the camp that the talent just isn't there on this team, or that the mix of players is just wrong. I'd rather trade Vooch and Evan before firing another coach.
IllMagic04
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,812
And1: 1,873
Joined: Jul 06, 2012
Location: Baltimore MD
     

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#48 » by IllMagic04 » Tue Dec 26, 2017 4:48 pm

UCFJayBird wrote:
Last Guardian wrote:I was under the impression he was a great player development coach. Really, he's just a motivational coach who doesn't know x's and o's. He doesn't adjust, he plays some horrid lineups. And as a motivational coach..he can't get his team to play hard. He doesn't really have a lot going for him.

You may get dealt a crappy hand and not have a lot of talent, but you can make the best of what you've got. That said, its not so bad, we may be the worst team this year and get the #1 pick.


To be fair Gordon is having his breakout year, Elfrid's percentages are up (except FTs), and Mario has actually been productive this month.

So in terms of player development not sure he's not doing it.

Put me in the camp that the talent just isn't there on this team, or that the mix of players is just wrong. I'd rather trade Vooch and Evan before firing another coach.


Right. Honestly I thought Issac might not even get time this year cause of Vogels win now attitude. But he got plenty of PT before the injury. I think he wants to develop as long as he sees the potential.. That said I'm not sure if Vogel is the right coach for this team going forward.
User avatar
ChosenSavior
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 29,326
And1: 13,018
Joined: Sep 09, 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:
   

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#49 » by ChosenSavior » Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:38 pm

Skin wrote:Give me a coach that wants to develop our real assets. Gordon and Isaac. That's all that matters.

Vogel is obviously not interested in doing that. He wants to "win as a team" and he's actually delusional enough to think that this team can do that. Fire his ass.


This.

It's Chad Forcier's time to shine. I'm ready.
User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,650
And1: 9,548
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#50 » by Blue_and_Whte » Wed Dec 27, 2017 2:33 pm

ChosenSavior wrote:
Skin wrote:Give me a coach that wants to develop our real assets. Gordon and Isaac. That's all that matters.

Vogel is obviously not interested in doing that. He wants to "win as a team" and he's actually delusional enough to think that this team can do that. Fire his ass.


This.

It's Chad Forcier's time to shine. I'm ready.

Its funny to see people complaining about the very things I brought up when we hired him, mainly the lack of offensive creativity. Amazing.

Now they want a guy to develop talent, before they wanted a player friendly coach. As i stated before he left, when we were comparing both coaches, Skiles never had elite talent so he had to be creative and adjust accordingly which Vogel has been unable or unwilling to do.Thats what made Skiles so good at taking young teams and turn them into winners. Its just sad that soft players couldn't handle his tough coaching style including ours. Hell, it looks like they cant handle Vogel and he's supposed to be "player friendly"

Hes overrated but I dont want to fire him now because the players tend to play harder (you know the way they're supposed to play if they haven't tuned out their coach) after a coach is fired, and I don't want meaningless wins.
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
User avatar
Furinkazan
General Manager
Posts: 7,981
And1: 3,625
Joined: May 11, 2005
     

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#51 » by Furinkazan » Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:37 pm



we need this guy as a coach :lol:

you gotta blitz them ... :lol:

User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,315
And1: 16,192
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#52 » by VFX » Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:52 pm

I wasn’t against Vogel until last night. I always take the coaches side on rotations because they see WAY more than fans will in practices. Also, it’s not like he has talent to work with.

That being said, I’m officially on the bandwagon in getting rid of Vogel. Whether it’s because of Martins, or by his own doing, he has played older players at the expense of the younger for pointless wins.

He had only up until recently given Mario any kind of minutes. Mario has been steadily improving with playing time and could have possibly been held back with his minutes restriction earlier.

Although people like to write Biz off entirely, Im closely watching what he can do as a starter after last nights performance. He is never going to wow anyone on offense, but he impacts games defensively when he gets in rhythm.

Lastly, Isaac should not have played last night if he was so quick to be re-injured. That’s either on Vogel, the medical staff, or Isaac is made of glass. I’m guessing it’s the former. Regardless, Vogel has some share of the fault in that assessment.

The fact that it’s taken this long for Vogel to make these rotational adjustments (because of injuries) has me questioning his leadership.
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,514
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#53 » by Skin » Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:10 pm

ChosenSavior wrote:
Skin wrote:Give me a coach that wants to develop our real assets. Gordon and Isaac. That's all that matters.

Vogel is obviously not interested in doing that. He wants to "win as a team" and he's actually delusional enough to think that this team can do that. Fire his ass.


This.

It's Chad Forcier's time to shine. I'm ready.

I'm down for that. :nod:
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,514
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#54 » by Skin » Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:22 pm

Blue_and_Whte wrote:
ChosenSavior wrote:
Skin wrote:Give me a coach that wants to develop our real assets. Gordon and Isaac. That's all that matters.

Vogel is obviously not interested in doing that. He wants to "win as a team" and he's actually delusional enough to think that this team can do that. Fire his ass.


This.

It's Chad Forcier's time to shine. I'm ready.

Its funny to see people complaining about the very things I brought up when we hired him, mainly the lack of offensive creativity. Amazing.

Now they want a guy to develop talent, before they wanted a player friendly coach. As i stated before he left, when we were comparing both coaches, Skiles never had elite talent so he had to be creative and adjust accordingly which Vogel has been unable or unwilling to do.Thats what made Skiles so good at taking young teams and turn them into winners. Its just sad that soft players couldn't handle his tough coaching style including ours. Hell, it looks like they cant handle Vogel and he's supposed to be "player friendly"

Hes overrated but I dont want to fire him now because the players tend to play harder (you know the way they're supposed to play if they haven't tuned out their coach) after a coach is fired, and I don't want meaningless wins.

Meh. Skiles favored vets over development just as bad if not worse. That was exactly his thing. Turning bad young teams to fringe playoff teams by using vets instead of taking the time to develop young players. ...and he never did anything in the playoffs because he never developed his vets into stars. AG and Mario were nightly bench fodder.

I've soured on Vogel because he's not interested in development either. These coaches just want to win and that's not our most important goal right now. My favorite coach since the Dwightmare has been Jacque Vaughn because he was fully committed to developing young players. But people here hated him because he lost too much. Go figure.
magicman112
Head Coach
Posts: 7,291
And1: 1,889
Joined: Oct 31, 2001
     

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#55 » by magicman112 » Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:54 pm

I haven't been one to blame Vogel because this roster is a mess even Phil Jackson or Pop would have to really work hard to get anything out of it. But we might have to move on from him just for the sake of having a fresh start.
User avatar
Furinkazan
General Manager
Posts: 7,981
And1: 3,625
Joined: May 11, 2005
     

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#56 » by Furinkazan » Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:43 pm

magicman112 wrote:I haven't been one to blame Vogel because this roster is a mess even Phil Jackson or Pop would have to really work hard to get anything out of it. But we might have to move on from him just for the sake of having a fresh start.



he was the one helping to construct it RH said he consulted moves with Vogel surely there is some blame on his part too
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,836
And1: 5,474
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#57 » by fendilim » Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:53 pm

Skin wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
ChosenSavior wrote:
This.

It's Chad Forcier's time to shine. I'm ready.

Its funny to see people complaining about the very things I brought up when we hired him, mainly the lack of offensive creativity. Amazing.

Now they want a guy to develop talent, before they wanted a player friendly coach. As i stated before he left, when we were comparing both coaches, Skiles never had elite talent so he had to be creative and adjust accordingly which Vogel has been unable or unwilling to do.Thats what made Skiles so good at taking young teams and turn them into winners. Its just sad that soft players couldn't handle his tough coaching style including ours. Hell, it looks like they cant handle Vogel and he's supposed to be "player friendly"

Hes overrated but I dont want to fire him now because the players tend to play harder (you know the way they're supposed to play if they haven't tuned out their coach) after a coach is fired, and I don't want meaningless wins.

Meh. Skiles favored vets over development just as bad if not worse. That was exactly his thing. Turning bad young teams to fringe playoff teams by using vets instead of taking the time to develop young players. ...and he never did anything in the playoffs because he never developed his vets into stars. AG and Mario were nightly bench fodder.

I've soured on Vogel because he's not interested in development either. These coaches just want to win and that's not our most important goal right now. My favorite coach since the Dwightmare has been Jacque Vaughn because he was fully committed to developing young players. But people here hated him because he lost too much. Go figure.

Tbh, i blame skiles’shortcomings more on management than Skiles himself. It was clear that he was coming in mandated to make the playoffs.

Thats why we had vaughn fired too, because his last year, we werent even close.

Also about Mario, Skiles actually utilized Mario well. And even Mario talked highly of Scott planning big things for him for his second season only to be surprised that Skiles resigned.

Also, other than mario, he played almost everyone of our young players the most.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/ORL/2016.html

Top 6 in mpg on that team were vic, ola, tobias, vuc, fournier and ag.
Image
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,015
And1: 18,998
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#58 » by pepe1991 » Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:33 pm

fendilim wrote:
Skin wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:Its funny to see people complaining about the very things I brought up when we hired him, mainly the lack of offensive creativity. Amazing.

Now they want a guy to develop talent, before they wanted a player friendly coach. As i stated before he left, when we were comparing both coaches, Skiles never had elite talent so he had to be creative and adjust accordingly which Vogel has been unable or unwilling to do.Thats what made Skiles so good at taking young teams and turn them into winners. Its just sad that soft players couldn't handle his tough coaching style including ours. Hell, it looks like they cant handle Vogel and he's supposed to be "player friendly"

Hes overrated but I dont want to fire him now because the players tend to play harder (you know the way they're supposed to play if they haven't tuned out their coach) after a coach is fired, and I don't want meaningless wins.

Meh. Skiles favored vets over development just as bad if not worse. That was exactly his thing. Turning bad young teams to fringe playoff teams by using vets instead of taking the time to develop young players. ...and he never did anything in the playoffs because he never developed his vets into stars. AG and Mario were nightly bench fodder.

I've soured on Vogel because he's not interested in development either. These coaches just want to win and that's not our most important goal right now. My favorite coach since the Dwightmare has been Jacque Vaughn because he was fully committed to developing young players. But people here hated him because he lost too much. Go figure.

Tbh, i blame skiles’shortcomings more on management than Skiles himself. It was clear that he was coming in mandated to make the playoffs.

Thats why we had vaughn fired too, because his last year, we werent even close.

Also about Mario, Skiles actually utilized Mario well. And even Mario talked highly of Scott planning big things for him for his second season only to be surprised that Skiles resigned.

Also, other than mario, he played almost everyone of our young players the most.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/ORL/2016.html

Top 6 in mpg on that team were vic, ola, tobias, vuc, fournier and ag.


He was kind a forced to play them. Only 3 players were older than 29 . Among them, Frye got traded, CJ Watson was always hurt and Smith played a lot.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,994
And1: 12,477
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: The Case Against Frank Vogel 

Post#59 » by BadMofoPimp » Thu Dec 28, 2017 10:15 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
fendilim wrote:
Skin wrote:Meh. Skiles favored vets over development just as bad if not worse. That was exactly his thing. Turning bad young teams to fringe playoff teams by using vets instead of taking the time to develop young players. ...and he never did anything in the playoffs because he never developed his vets into stars. AG and Mario were nightly bench fodder.

I've soured on Vogel because he's not interested in development either. These coaches just want to win and that's not our most important goal right now. My favorite coach since the Dwightmare has been Jacque Vaughn because he was fully committed to developing young players. But people here hated him because he lost too much. Go figure.

Tbh, i blame skiles’shortcomings more on management than Skiles himself. It was clear that he was coming in mandated to make the playoffs.

Thats why we had vaughn fired too, because his last year, we werent even close.

Also about Mario, Skiles actually utilized Mario well. And even Mario talked highly of Scott planning big things for him for his second season only to be surprised that Skiles resigned.

Also, other than mario, he played almost everyone of our young players the most.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/ORL/2016.html

Top 6 in mpg on that team were vic, ola, tobias, vuc, fournier and ag.


He was kind a forced to play them. Only 3 players were older than 29 . Among them, Frye got traded, CJ Watson was always hurt and Smith played a lot.


And still, Skiles was able to get more out of his team!
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!

Return to Orlando Magic