MagicMatic wrote:PennytoShaq wrote:MagicMatic wrote:
The difference between phillys model and Orlando is that they actually move on from non-quality starters they draft before they lose too much value. Orlando keeps them as long as possible.
Vuc and Biz aren’t the issue. They can come off the bench until they expire and in Vuc’s case, be moved if necessary.
The issue is AG. He’s only a PF. He’s proven that. Isaac we don’t know if he’s better suited playing on the wing, as a PF, or as a true small ball C. Why relegate him to playing a position because AG has zero versatility and it suits the lineup?
I fully remember the year and offseason everyone was campaigning for AG to be a 3 and Hennigan essentially drafted Ibaka to play big... that worked out great right? AG “lost” a year of development (according to his apologists) and he went back to PF.
I’m not saying it’s exactly the case, but until we know what Isaac is best suited to play, and we know AG isn’t in the future, it is more important to put these players in the best possible situation to succeed.
A lineup of Isaac, AG, and JJJ is questionable offensively and you know it. He likely won’t be there at 6 anyway.
Can you explain what happened Philly and Noel then and also with Okafor? It is not line with what you stated. In fact, you really have no basis for that opinion, unless you want to hang your hat on the one trade this FO made since they got here. And that has been discussed over and over. There is no way they were going to trade the Magic's starting PG at the start of the season, especially when his value was already low anyway.
AG did not lose a year of development at all. Playing on the basketball court is development. It is extremely common for GMs to play young guys out of position their first few years in the league. They do it on purpose. Portland's GM spoke about this exact thing during the combine, since he just did it with Zach Collins. Your concern with this is your own issue, but NBA GM's don't share it.
Ah so trading for Ibaka and signing Biz to an insane contract in the offseason was really only to play AG out of position purposely? Nice take. Regardless it failed.
That wasn't my take at all. Not even sure how you made that reach.
Your concern is that playing a guy like Isaac at the 3 would hurt his development. It would not regardless if he does well there or not.
Getting guys on the court and playing ball, especially in a league that is more postionless than ever before is only going to help them improve.
Again, not really even my opinion. This is just a common practice in the NBA now and not a issue that is worth being concerned about.