bigdogdylan5 wrote:tiderulz wrote:UCFJayBird wrote:It basically comes down to this: Can he develop into a legitimate, consistent, 3 point threat? If the answer is yes, great pick. his defense is solid, he's good at cutting to the basket, and if he can hit the long ball and spread the floor he'll be a valuable addition.
If he doesn't develop that shot, it will have been an overreach and he should've gone in the middle of the round. Time will tell. But it's kind of telling that he has to develop his shot to be worthy of that pick (IMO). That means unless he just blows everyone away in development and turns into a Dirk or something, we're all going to, at best, say he was a good pick at #8 (not great, not a steal, etc, just good).
well, he just shot 34% on 3.5 attempts, raising up from 31% the year before. so he has already shown improvement. 34% walking into the league isnt a sniper, but it isnt bad. repetition should increase that
I dont know how much work there really needs to be on the 3 ball. I mean FT shooting is there and he shot 40% on 3.6 attempts per game for that 22 game stretch.
I mean if he is a consistent 40% shooter than it's going to be a great find for us. But that's a big if. I mean just look at Terrence Ross. he shot 37% his last season in college, and he hasn't cracked 40% in the NBA once (though has come close a few times). Ross is a streaky shooter, and when he gets hot look out, but even someone known for their shooting struggles to get into the upper 30s over the course of a season.
a) The NBA three is not the same as NCAA. It might just be another foot and a half, and it's becoming less of an issue for players, but it's still an adjustment.
b) The rigors of the NBA are just different than college. We've seen great shooters in college fade in the NBA, and Wagner was a good shooter, but not great.
c) 22 games is too small a sample size IMO. I'll go with the 35% he shot for the season, which is good, not great.
If he shoots close to 40% from three he'll be a great additional to the squad.