RichCollab wrote:tiderulz wrote:The Effect wrote:
This is just my opinion, but no i dont think he fits what we need at PG
Not saying i wouldnt want him on the team, would be thrilled if we drafted him, but i just dont think weltman is thinking that way
The way i think they see if, and this was strengthened in my head after yesterday, is that Suggs is our PG, unquestioned. They didnt give up 4 1st for a SG if they thought suggs was gonna move back to SG. Suggs is THE GUY as long as hes here. So hes PG1. With Black not being included in the trade, you have to assume if we included him in the trade, we probably could of removed either the suns pick or '28+'30, they choose not to do that because they value him too much. hes the 6th man\PG2 and i think they feel hes a guy who could become the PG1 one day. so with those 2 set as the PGs, i doubt their thinking is a 3rd young pg. i think the 3rd PG will be an older vet on a league min type deal who can help these guys develop without taking away valuable playing time, much like CoJo last year. I think clayton would be adding more youth to a position that needs some vet leadership
I see either CoJo being brought back, and if not him, someone like him
why cant Clayton be the PG from the bench? because honestly, i dont see Black as a real PG. i see Black as our bench wing defender
Clayton is a converted SG just like Suggs and AB. Clayton didn’t convert until like his 4th year.
I’m not sure why people automatically think he will be a PG. His size is better at PG but he is in the same boat as the others.
He will be fine here playing PG, together with AB as a wing defender, and at any time of the game there will be either Bane, Franz or Paolo on the court to initiate the offense.
