jonbob17 wrote:Here's a write up on Jase:
https://www.noceilingsnba.com/p/the-case-for-jase-richardsonThis was predraft and part of the writer's conclusion:
The question then becomes where you feel comfortable drafting this type of player. It’s going to be team-dependent. From a front office perspective,
I’d feel most comfortable with Jase in an environment like Orlando’s, where he would have a good amount of defensive insulation and an offense that already runs through bigger players. That would give him an easier path to getting on an NBA floor and positively contributing earlier in his career. In this class, the latter part of the first round feels right. You’re already dealing with a higher level of risk once you get into that range, and there are multiple situations where it’s easy to envision Richardson both finding a place to contribute and having his developmental needs met.
Good one...I'm not blind to the risk, but most of us were more than willing to give up a GOOD frp (or more) for Sexton, who looks like a very similar model.
the differences are:
-Sexton has PROVEN he can do it on the NBA level...he was a non-factor for years as a ball-pounding, empty stats, failed pick for CLE
-Sexton gets paid $19m and then he expires and becomes a hungry UFA
-Sexton has evolved into a more sensible efficient player in UTA...Jase already shows tremendous efficiency, particularly at the rim, but also from 3
-Jase has done NOTHING at the NBA level, but growing up in an NBA family does suggest some familiarity with the vibe of the league (Like Jett?

)
I mean it really does look like a better, more efficient Cole...which is just what the doctor ordered for us, at a late frp salary slot.