ImageImageImageImage

Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick?

Moderators: Howard Mass, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, UCFJayBird, ChosenSavior

User avatar
Xatticus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,813
And1: 8,320
Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Location: the land of the blind
         

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#121 » by Xatticus » Sat May 15, 2021 11:08 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
Xatticus wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
Ehh, he more mobile than Vuc & Kanter because they are 7 footers and he is between 6'9 and 6'10.
But the way he scores isn't really that translatable in nba. He has no outside range, he is more similar to Wendell Carter than Kenter or Vuc who are way more polished i eqipped with bigger bodies.

What's execlly his role in modern offense? Not streach big, not that fast, not that athletic, not rim runner and not as strong passer as somebody like Sabonis? So it's just 6'10( like Wendell) player that occupies same space below rim as Wendell, who won't do anything on his own and who is best used as rolling big ( again, as Wendell) and off ball he is either screening, or wasting space because he won't do anything for your offense outside 10 feet.

At apsolute best he is Domas Sabonis. As realistic outcome, he is very similar player to Wendell


He isn't as polished as 30 and 28-year-old NBA vets? I'm not even going to argue the merits of that position. I just want to highlight the fact that you said it.

He is a better post scorer at this moment than Vucevic has ever been in his life, but we don't like him because he could never be as good at stretching the floor as a guy that hit 0 of 3 3-point shots at Sengun's current age? The very best conceivable outcome for Sengun is a player that was vastly inferior to Sengun at the same age? He'll never be able to pass the ball as well as a guy that had fewer than half as many assists per 40 minutes at the same age?

What he is now is not what he is going to be five years from now. There are no certainties. We're just trying to identify talent. We should be comparing him to the other potential draftees in this draft class.



I wanna highlight that i compared him to players that are 25 years old (allstar) and 22 years old center. Sabonis and WCjr. Fact.
Both players entered nba without outside jumpshot, both players years later, still don't have one. Facts. Only facts.

He is a better post scorer at this moment than Vucevic has ever been in his life
One of dummest hot takes ever.
Vuc did play for 10 games in Europe in 2010, averaged 17 ppg, 10 rpg and did shoot some threes ( actually higher clip and higher efficiency than Sengun). So no, if you are going by counting stats to make overarching claim Sengun is "better" post player than Vučević, you are just making fool of yourself. If you are going by eye-test, witch i highly doubt, since you probably never saw Alperen Segun live game in your life, than you again, making fool of yourself because your comment is made from pure fact you disslike Vučević so much that you were in past already making fool of yourself, claiming Bamba is , and i qoute "more talented".
By talent, i assume he is more talented at missing shots and being unable to grasp nba offense or defense.


But back to Sengun. For start, he is playing as PF. In modern age of nba, PFs have to be able to shoot ( he can't) , defend fast wings ( he can't ) and be mobile ( he is not). So what are you projecting is that he will either have to improve his athletic outlook A LOT ( not that easy since he isn't gifted athlete at all ) or that he will learn to shoot ( guy for a season shot 4/21 for 3 ,despite Euro three being shorter distance than nba one ).

There are plenty of postup bigs who didn't or don't work in nba. And Sabonis. Sabonis is very,very good rebounder and terrific passer. If Sengun can't advance his game, you are literally working with Andrew Nicholson type prospect.

Since i had opportunity to watch Sengun play, my experience with him was underwhelming as hell. He simply didn't do anything special, especially knowing how terrible competition was.

Does that mean he is guranteed bust? No. But i don't see alleged star potential. I see very average nba role player. Must like most of this draft outside of few prospects that have allstar potential.


Yes. You label it one of the dumbest hot takes ever, then proceed to provide no data to refute it. Because you can't. Because it's obviously true. A TS% north of .700. A FTr of .576. Watch the video. If you don't see it, then I don't know what to tell you.

And yes... it's exceedingly obvious that Bamba is more talented. I don't know why this is so difficult for you to understand. We project outcomes. The guy with the higher potential outcome is more talented. I can't think of a better example of a low-ceiling player than Vucevic. He's been given 20,000+ minutes to prove himself useful in some way or another and it hasn't yet materialized. He's been given more freedom to influence the outcome of his team's games than anyone else on his rosters. The result: 252-415.

Keep in mind, I didn't bring this **** up. You did. I'd very much like to move on from this, but it's important that someone points out your BS from time to time. Dogma is your shtick. You seem to be under the impression that saying the same dumb **** 100 times over wills it into existence. I'm sure it makes sense to you, but it's the same dumb **** 100 times over to my ears.

Example:

He has no outside range, he is more similar to Wendell Carter than Kenter or Vuc who are way more polished i eqipped with bigger bodies.


You said it. What are you trying to argue about? I don't give a **** who you compared him to. It's asinine. You should be comparing his skill set to these players' skill sets at comparable ages. That's not what you are doing.

I don't give a **** what Vucevic did in 10 games in the Montenegrin league after spending three years at USC. WTF does this tell us about Sengun?

You blame the same players years after they are gone for the failures of the players you are enamored with. The ghost of Elfrid Payton will haunt this board until you decide to move on. You throw a fit when I compare Vucevic to Gminski, but then you link a puff piece by NBA.com not two weeks later that effectively states that Gminski's record for being the softest center in the history of the NBA is about to be broken by Nikola Vucevic. And now you tell me how Sengun isn't nearly as polished as the guy that I have labeled a polished turd on numerous occasions? You have no sense of irony.

I'm not even stanning for Sengun. I just find him preferable to the other guys that aren't at the top of this prospect pool. He has demonstrated mastery of the Turkish Super League at the age of 18. That's impressive to me. But now this is going to become a thing because it offends your Vucevic-centric universe.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,953
And1: 20,122
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#122 » by pepe1991 » Sun May 16, 2021 7:47 am

Xatticus wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
Xatticus wrote:
He isn't as polished as 30 and 28-year-old NBA vets? I'm not even going to argue the merits of that position. I just want to highlight the fact that you said it.

He is a better post scorer at this moment than Vucevic has ever been in his life, but we don't like him because he could never be as good at stretching the floor as a guy that hit 0 of 3 3-point shots at Sengun's current age? The very best conceivable outcome for Sengun is a player that was vastly inferior to Sengun at the same age? He'll never be able to pass the ball as well as a guy that had fewer than half as many assists per 40 minutes at the same age?

What he is now is not what he is going to be five years from now. There are no certainties. We're just trying to identify talent. We should be comparing him to the other potential draftees in this draft class.



I wanna highlight that i compared him to players that are 25 years old (allstar) and 22 years old center. Sabonis and WCjr. Fact.
Both players entered nba without outside jumpshot, both players years later, still don't have one. Facts. Only facts.

He is a better post scorer at this moment than Vucevic has ever been in his life
One of dummest hot takes ever.
Vuc did play for 10 games in Europe in 2010, averaged 17 ppg, 10 rpg and did shoot some threes ( actually higher clip and higher efficiency than Sengun). So no, if you are going by counting stats to make overarching claim Sengun is "better" post player than Vučević, you are just making fool of yourself. If you are going by eye-test, witch i highly doubt, since you probably never saw Alperen Segun live game in your life, than you again, making fool of yourself because your comment is made from pure fact you disslike Vučević so much that you were in past already making fool of yourself, claiming Bamba is , and i qoute "more talented".
By talent, i assume he is more talented at missing shots and being unable to grasp nba offense or defense.


But back to Sengun. For start, he is playing as PF. In modern age of nba, PFs have to be able to shoot ( he can't) , defend fast wings ( he can't ) and be mobile ( he is not). So what are you projecting is that he will either have to improve his athletic outlook A LOT ( not that easy since he isn't gifted athlete at all ) or that he will learn to shoot ( guy for a season shot 4/21 for 3 ,despite Euro three being shorter distance than nba one ).

There are plenty of postup bigs who didn't or don't work in nba. And Sabonis. Sabonis is very,very good rebounder and terrific passer. If Sengun can't advance his game, you are literally working with Andrew Nicholson type prospect.

Since i had opportunity to watch Sengun play, my experience with him was underwhelming as hell. He simply didn't do anything special, especially knowing how terrible competition was.

Does that mean he is guranteed bust? No. But i don't see alleged star potential. I see very average nba role player. Must like most of this draft outside of few prospects that have allstar potential.


Yes. You label it one of the dumbest hot takes ever, then proceed to provide no data to refute it. Because you can't. Because it's obviously true. A TS% north of .700. A FTr of .576. Watch the video. If you don't see it, then I don't know what to tell you.

And yes... it's exceedingly obvious that Bamba is more talented. I don't know why this is so difficult for you to understand. We project outcomes. The guy with the higher potential outcome is more talented. I can't think of a better example of a low-ceiling player than Vucevic. He's been given 20,000+ minutes to prove himself useful in some way or another and it hasn't yet materialized. He's been given more freedom to influence the outcome of his team's games than anyone else on his rosters. The result: 252-415.

Keep in mind, I didn't bring this **** up. You did. I'd very much like to move on from this, but it's important that someone points out your BS from time to time. Dogma is your shtick. You seem to be under the impression that saying the same dumb **** 100 times over wills it into existence. I'm sure it makes sense to you, but it's the same dumb **** 100 times over to my ears.

Example:

He has no outside range, he is more similar to Wendell Carter than Kenter or Vuc who are way more polished i eqipped with bigger bodies.


You said it. What are you trying to argue about? I don't give a **** who you compared him to. It's asinine. You should be comparing his skill set to these players' skill sets at comparable ages. That's not what you are doing.

I don't give a **** what Vucevic did in 10 games in the Montenegrin league after spending three years at USC. WTF does this tell us about Sengun?

You blame the same players years after they are gone for the failures of the players you are enamored with. The ghost of Elfrid Payton will haunt this board until you decide to move on. You throw a fit when I compare Vucevic to Gminski, but then you link a puff piece by NBA.com not two weeks later that effectively states that Gminski's record for being the softest center in the history of the NBA is about to be broken by Nikola Vucevic. And now you tell me how Sengun isn't nearly as polished as the guy that I have labeled a polished turd on numerous occasions? You have no sense of irony.

I'm not even stanning for Sengun. I just find him preferable to the other guys that aren't at the top of this prospect pool. He has demonstrated mastery of the Turkish Super League at the age of 18. That's impressive to me. But now this is going to become a thing because it offends your Vucevic-centric universe.



Oh boy let's go through more nonsense

You label it one of the dumbest hot takes ever, then proceed to provide no data to refute it. Because you can't. Because it's obviously true. A TS% north of .700. A FTr of .576. Watch the video. If you don't see it, then I don't know what to tell you.

On mediocre team in Turkey where he is shoehorned into " go to guy". Level of competition so mediocre outside of top 2 teams, that right now his team is playing Tofas in playoffs, who's best player is guy who can't crack Croatia top 30 rotation players for national team.

And yes... it's exceedingly obvious that Bamba is more talented. I don't know why this is so difficult for you to understand. We project outcomes. The guy with the higher potential outcome is more talented. I can't think of a better example of a low-ceiling player than Vucevic. He's been given 20,000+ minutes to prove himself useful in some way or another and it hasn't yet materialized.

This is your typical bull***t post.
Vučević materialized into career 17 ppg, 10 rpg guy who made allstar team twice in his life.
Mo Bamba materlized into terrible center who can't even start on 3rd worst team in nba during rebuild. 23 years old player who probably won't last in nba pass age of 26.
IT's very obvious who is more talented. Hint. It's not guy you claim.
You allegedly project outcomes. Outcome are clear and loud. 30 years old allstar, 23 years old bench scrub. YOu just elect to defend wrong opinion just like you kept burning on Ellfrid Payton shield along with few other moderators.
Ghoust of Elfrid Payton is brought every time when you go on this type of " i know everything " road where you try to soooo hard to make it sound like you are 100% right and know everything. When in reality you kept defending one of worst starting PGs in nba for years. Just own your bias like Sould did. I own my Hezonja BS.

I'm not even stanning for Sengun. I just find him preferable to the other guys that aren't at the top of this prospect pool. He has demonstrated mastery of the Turkish Super League at the age of 18. That's impressive to me. But now this is going to become a thing because it offends your Vucevic-centric universe.
[/quote]

League where Andrew Nicholson last year avearged 21 ppg on 4,5 apg ,4 rpg, shot 39% for 3 and draw 6,3 fouls.


Anyway, since i'm 100% sure that i'm only person who actually SAW HIM PLAY IN REAL GAMES i think my word holds way more value than somebody who saw 5 min of highlights and decided to make laughable claim he has better post game than top 5 center in NBA.
So back to Alperen Şengün. Shows no range in jumpshot, does not defend well pick& roll, is poor athlete, 6'9, best used as small ball center who also struggles a lot against more phyiscal players.
There is something to be said about player who allows third string Croatia center to score 30 in qualifications game where both teams score below 85 points.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
axl_c_cool
Analyst
Posts: 3,611
And1: 871
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
     

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#123 » by axl_c_cool » Sun May 16, 2021 10:10 am

On the topic I'm hoping Barnes slides to #8. Versatile and adds depth

Fultz/Cole
1RP/Hampton
Okeke/Ross
Isaac/Barnes
Bamba/WCJ

I would be very happy going into next season with those 12

Sent from my SM-G950F using RealGM mobile app
FORMALLY LC MAGIC
axl_c_cool
Analyst
Posts: 3,611
And1: 871
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
     

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#124 » by axl_c_cool » Sun May 16, 2021 10:12 am

Don't know why I'm not a Kuminga fan, maybe its fit, maybe it's because we've drafted so many athletes who can't shoot, just not a fan. Okeke over Kuminga everytime for me
Howard Mass wrote:
yoyojw17 wrote:
Howard Mass wrote:On Chuma Okeke, I think he will eventually play more 3. I have him slotted as backup PF next year.

As for the salary floor, you can always use the room in between to accumulate some more assets.

I already slotted him in as the starting 3. lol

I would love to see what the combination of ball movement and defense between a lineup of

Fultz/Harris/Chuma/Isaac/Carter would be.


I see Chuma eventually playing the 3. Just not sure if it will be next season. I'm sure we will see that lineup at times next season.


Sent from my SM-G950F using RealGM mobile app
FORMALLY LC MAGIC
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,570
And1: 9,100
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#125 » by drsd » Sun May 16, 2021 1:05 pm

..
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,570
And1: 9,100
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#126 » by drsd » Sun May 16, 2021 1:07 pm

axl_c_cool wrote:Don't know why I'm not a Kuminga fan,...



I know why I am not; the kid looks like Aaron Gordon 2.0. The last thing this Magic roster needs is a player that needs to develop a jumper. And on the wing: nope. A big, big NO thank you. I am totally opposed to Scottie Barnes, Keon Johnson, and Ziaire Williams for the same reason.

In all seriousness, I would rather the Magic draft Kispert at #5 than any of Kuminga, Johnson, Barnes, or Williams. (I would hope the Magic drafts Moody and not over think this all.

..
Magic_Stick914
Ballboy
Posts: 24
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 09, 2021
       

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#127 » by Magic_Stick914 » Sun May 16, 2021 3:55 pm

drsd wrote:
axl_c_cool wrote:Don't know why I'm not a Kuminga fan,...



I know why I am not; the kid looks like Aaron Gordon 2.0. The last thing this Magic roster needs is a player that needs to develop a jumper. And on the wing: nope. A big, big NO thank you. I am totally opposed to Scottie Barnes, Keon Johnson, and Ziaire Williams for the same reason.

In all seriousness, I would rather the Magic draft Kispert at #5 than any of Kuminga, Johnson, Barnes, or Williams. (I would hope the Magic drafts Moody and not over think this all.

..



I concur 100%
The Effect
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 4,891
And1: 2,119
Joined: Jul 09, 2004

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#128 » by The Effect » Sun May 16, 2021 4:47 pm

drsd wrote:
axl_c_cool wrote:Don't know why I'm not a Kuminga fan,...



I know why I am not; the kid looks like Aaron Gordon 2.0. The last thing this Magic roster needs is a player that needs to develop a jumper. And on the wing: nope. A big, big NO thank you. I am totally opposed to Scottie Barnes, Keon Johnson, and Ziaire Williams for the same reason.

In all seriousness, I would rather the Magic draft Kispert at #5 than any of Kuminga, Johnson, Barnes, or Williams. (I would hope the Magic drafts Moody and not over think this all.

..

This is what i was saying since the first time i saw him play, hes literally 18 year old AG. Exact same game
ANd that makes it hard for me because until the trade deadline, AG was my favorite magic player of the post-Dwight era... But, i dont know i just cant get to excited about the prospect of tanking just to land Kuminga

Now, if we did draft him, the saving grace to me would be the thought of, what if hes 18 year old AG now, BUT develops into what what we all hoped AG would turn into, an uber-athletic combo forward who can take over games on both ends. Or say he develops more along the lines of Siakem than AG?

I dont know, to me, hes clearly behind Cade and the Jalens, and probably behind Mobley as well, but i think i take him over any of the guys in the projected 6-10 range
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,570
And1: 9,100
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#129 » by drsd » Sun May 16, 2021 6:13 pm

The Effect wrote:I dont know, to me, hes clearly behind Cade and the Jalens, and probably behind Mobley as well, but i think i take him over any of the guys in the projected 6-10 range


Reflecting on the 2014 draft, there was all that hype about Wiggins and Parker; they were going to go 1 and 2. And Embiid was everyone in the words #3 pick.

Then Mr. Gordon at #4.

Then from 5-14 there were a bunc of guys projected well below Gordon. (Some of them become nice players, but there are always randomly excellent players in that range).

I accept that most ill have Jonathan Kuminga as the 5th best prospect in this draft. But I think Moody is simply so much a better fit for this team, that BPA is not the right call if the Magic draft 5.

Moody could be this generations JJ Redick, and with better height and length to boot. That kind of player has a clear role on a team and I think a 5th pick is not an over-reach for a "Redick". (( and yes I recall how poorly the media saw the Magic drafting Redick, labelling him as "only a shooter" )).


...


Back on topic, it is looking a lot like the 9th pick is the most likely outcome of the Bulls pick. Moody will not slide that far. And I still do not like the idea of all the available winds with no jumper. Who does that leave? Davion Mitchell and Corey Kispert are obvious choices. But why not Kai Jones with the 9th selection? Orlando needs a backup Center. And it is unclear that either Bamba or Carter will be a complete starter. So why not work out three projects to find out which one is best for this roster?

..
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 29,239
And1: 30,107
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#130 » by Knightro » Sun May 16, 2021 6:31 pm

drsd wrote:I accept that most ill have Jonathan Kuminga as the 5th best prospect in this draft. But I think Moody is simply so much a better fit for this team, that BPA is not the right call if the Magic draft 5.




I'm not even the world's biggest Kuminga fan, but this is entirely the wrong outlook on what this situation is. If you think Moody is the better player, so be it. But if you don't, this is absolutely the wrong way to be treating this draft.

The Magic are an awful team that doesn't have one star talent. They *may* have one building block type of player in Isaac, but even he's a huge question mark because of his injury history.

The Magic *cannot* under any circumstances pick a lesser player in the name of fit.

Anthony, Hampton, Fultz, Okeke, Carter, Bamba and Isaac are all guys we have various degrees of optimism about, but not any one of them are so good that the Magic should make any lottery selections based on fit with those guys.
The Effect
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 4,891
And1: 2,119
Joined: Jul 09, 2004

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#131 » by The Effect » Sun May 16, 2021 6:49 pm

Knightro wrote:
drsd wrote:I accept that most ill have Jonathan Kuminga as the 5th best prospect in this draft. But I think Moody is simply so much a better fit for this team, that BPA is not the right call if the Magic draft 5.




I'm not even the world's biggest Kuminga fan, but this is entirely the wrong outlook on what this situation is. If you think Moody is the better player, so be it. But if you don't, this is absolutely the wrong way to be treating this draft.

The Magic are an awful team that doesn't have one star talent. They *may* have one building block type of player in Isaac, but even he's a huge question mark because of his injury history.

The Magic *cannot* under any circumstances pick a lesser player in the name of fit.

Anthony, Hampton, Fultz, Okeke, Carter, Bamba and Isaac are all guys we various degrees of optimism about, but not any one of them are so good that the Magic should make any lottery selections based on fit with those guys.


Agree with this 100%. If you think Kuminga is the better player, you take him, regardless of fit or current makeup of the team

NOW, like you said, if drsd thinks that moody will be the better player (not a crazy thought), then sure you take him over kuminga. Either way, to me, you have to ignore the current team and just draft the guy who will be the best player overall because right now, not sure we have a franchise player on the team*

* i love the potential of Cole, RJ, okeke, fultz and isaac, and even the 2 centers and think a couple of those guys will be cornerstones of the team going forward, but that wouldnt stop me from drafting someone at their positions
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,570
And1: 9,100
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#132 » by drsd » Sun May 16, 2021 7:35 pm

I do not think Kuminga is a better player than Moody. He might be a better prospect, and that's the rub.
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,570
And1: 9,100
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#133 » by drsd » Sun May 16, 2021 7:37 pm

The Effect wrote:* i love the potential of Cole, RJ, okeke, fultz and isaac, and even the 2 centers and think a couple of those guys will be cornerstones of the team going forward, but that wouldnt stop me from drafting someone at their positions


As this is the Bulls' pick thread:
Is this not the argument to draft Kai Jones at a probable 9?


..
The Effect
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 4,891
And1: 2,119
Joined: Jul 09, 2004

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#134 » by The Effect » Sun May 16, 2021 7:43 pm

drsd wrote:
The Effect wrote:* i love the potential of Cole, RJ, okeke, fultz and isaac, and even the 2 centers and think a couple of those guys will be cornerstones of the team going forward, but that wouldnt stop me from drafting someone at their positions


As this is the Bulls' pick thread:
Is this not the argument to draft Kai Jones at a probable 9?


..

It could be
Not my choice, but wouldnt surprise me if hes in the running
User avatar
Xatticus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,813
And1: 8,320
Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Location: the land of the blind
         

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#135 » by Xatticus » Sun May 16, 2021 7:52 pm

drsd wrote:
The Effect wrote:I dont know, to me, hes clearly behind Cade and the Jalens, and probably behind Mobley as well, but i think i take him over any of the guys in the projected 6-10 range


Reflecting on the 2014 draft, there was all that hype about Wiggins and Parker; they were going to go 1 and 2. And Embiid was everyone in the words #3 pick.

Then Mr. Gordon at #4.

Then from 5-14 there were a bunc of guys projected well below Gordon. (Some of them become nice players, but there are always randomly excellent players in that range).

I accept that most ill have Jonathan Kuminga as the 5th best prospect in this draft. But I think Moody is simply so much a better fit for this team, that BPA is not the right call if the Magic draft 5.

Moody could be this generations JJ Redick, and with better height and length to boot. That kind of player has a clear role on a team and I think a 5th pick is not an over-reach for a "Redick". (( and yes I recall how poorly the media saw the Magic drafting Redick, labelling him as "only a shooter" )).


...


Back on topic, it is looking a lot like the 9th pick is the most likely outcome of the Bulls pick. Moody will not slide that far. And I still do not like the idea of all the available winds with no jumper. Who does that leave? Davion Mitchell and Corey Kispert are obvious choices. But why not Kai Jones with the 9th selection? Orlando needs a backup Center. And it is unclear that either Bamba or Carter will be a complete starter. So why not work out three projects to find out which one is best for this roster?

..


Moody’s shooting profile isn’t anywhere near what Redick’s was. Nobody in this class is Redick. The only one I’d have as being somewhat close is Hyland. There are 3 predictors for 3-point ability: FT%, 3PAr, and 3P%.

I want to point out that Moody’s numbers are inflated because he played a lot of minutes. He had a decent rebound rate and a good free throw rate. His numbers are otherwise rather pedestrian. I think people are seeing something more in him because his per game numbers are better than the other wing prospects in his tier, but that’s all about his minutes. He really isn’t all that appealing unless you believe his shooting is vastly superior to what he demonstrated this year.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 29,239
And1: 30,107
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#136 » by Knightro » Sun May 16, 2021 8:32 pm

Xatticus wrote:Moody’s shooting profile isn’t anywhere near what Redick’s was. Nobody in this class is Redick. The only one I’d have as being somewhat close is Hyland. There are 3 predictors for 3-point ability: FT%, 3PAr, and 3P%.

I want to point out that Moody’s numbers are inflated because he played a lot of minutes. He had a decent rebound rate and a good free throw rate. His numbers are otherwise rather pedestrian. I think people are seeing something more in him because his per game numbers are better than the other wing prospects in his tier, but that’s all about his minutes. He really isn’t all that appealing unless you believe his shooting is vastly superior to what he demonstrated this year.


I do think a good chunk of Moody's perceived value is tied into his age. He's still 18 years old.

One of the younger players in the class. The only guys I know for sure that are younger are Sengun and Kuminga.
User avatar
Xatticus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,813
And1: 8,320
Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Location: the land of the blind
         

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#137 » by Xatticus » Sun May 16, 2021 8:33 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
Xatticus wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:

I wanna highlight that i compared him to players that are 25 years old (allstar) and 22 years old center. Sabonis and WCjr. Fact.
Both players entered nba without outside jumpshot, both players years later, still don't have one. Facts. Only facts.

One of dummest hot takes ever.
Vuc did play for 10 games in Europe in 2010, averaged 17 ppg, 10 rpg and did shoot some threes ( actually higher clip and higher efficiency than Sengun). So no, if you are going by counting stats to make overarching claim Sengun is "better" post player than Vučević, you are just making fool of yourself. If you are going by eye-test, witch i highly doubt, since you probably never saw Alperen Segun live game in your life, than you again, making fool of yourself because your comment is made from pure fact you disslike Vučević so much that you were in past already making fool of yourself, claiming Bamba is , and i qoute "more talented".
By talent, i assume he is more talented at missing shots and being unable to grasp nba offense or defense.


But back to Sengun. For start, he is playing as PF. In modern age of nba, PFs have to be able to shoot ( he can't) , defend fast wings ( he can't ) and be mobile ( he is not). So what are you projecting is that he will either have to improve his athletic outlook A LOT ( not that easy since he isn't gifted athlete at all ) or that he will learn to shoot ( guy for a season shot 4/21 for 3 ,despite Euro three being shorter distance than nba one ).

There are plenty of postup bigs who didn't or don't work in nba. And Sabonis. Sabonis is very,very good rebounder and terrific passer. If Sengun can't advance his game, you are literally working with Andrew Nicholson type prospect.

Since i had opportunity to watch Sengun play, my experience with him was underwhelming as hell. He simply didn't do anything special, especially knowing how terrible competition was.

Does that mean he is guranteed bust? No. But i don't see alleged star potential. I see very average nba role player. Must like most of this draft outside of few prospects that have allstar potential.


Yes. You label it one of the dumbest hot takes ever, then proceed to provide no data to refute it. Because you can't. Because it's obviously true. A TS% north of .700. A FTr of .576. Watch the video. If you don't see it, then I don't know what to tell you.

And yes... it's exceedingly obvious that Bamba is more talented. I don't know why this is so difficult for you to understand. We project outcomes. The guy with the higher potential outcome is more talented. I can't think of a better example of a low-ceiling player than Vucevic. He's been given 20,000+ minutes to prove himself useful in some way or another and it hasn't yet materialized. He's been given more freedom to influence the outcome of his team's games than anyone else on his rosters. The result: 252-415.

Keep in mind, I didn't bring this **** up. You did. I'd very much like to move on from this, but it's important that someone points out your BS from time to time. Dogma is your shtick. You seem to be under the impression that saying the same dumb **** 100 times over wills it into existence. I'm sure it makes sense to you, but it's the same dumb **** 100 times over to my ears.

Example:

He has no outside range, he is more similar to Wendell Carter than Kenter or Vuc who are way more polished i eqipped with bigger bodies.


You said it. What are you trying to argue about? I don't give a **** who you compared him to. It's asinine. You should be comparing his skill set to these players' skill sets at comparable ages. That's not what you are doing.

I don't give a **** what Vucevic did in 10 games in the Montenegrin league after spending three years at USC. WTF does this tell us about Sengun?

You blame the same players years after they are gone for the failures of the players you are enamored with. The ghost of Elfrid Payton will haunt this board until you decide to move on. You throw a fit when I compare Vucevic to Gminski, but then you link a puff piece by NBA.com not two weeks later that effectively states that Gminski's record for being the softest center in the history of the NBA is about to be broken by Nikola Vucevic. And now you tell me how Sengun isn't nearly as polished as the guy that I have labeled a polished turd on numerous occasions? You have no sense of irony.

I'm not even stanning for Sengun. I just find him preferable to the other guys that aren't at the top of this prospect pool. He has demonstrated mastery of the Turkish Super League at the age of 18. That's impressive to me. But now this is going to become a thing because it offends your Vucevic-centric universe.



Oh boy let's go through more nonsense

You label it one of the dumbest hot takes ever, then proceed to provide no data to refute it. Because you can't. Because it's obviously true. A TS% north of .700. A FTr of .576. Watch the video. If you don't see it, then I don't know what to tell you.

On mediocre team in Turkey where he is shoehorned into " go to guy". Level of competition so mediocre outside of top 2 teams, that right now his team is playing Tofas in playoffs, who's best player is guy who can't crack Croatia top 30 rotation players for national team.

And yes... it's exceedingly obvious that Bamba is more talented. I don't know why this is so difficult for you to understand. We project outcomes. The guy with the higher potential outcome is more talented. I can't think of a better example of a low-ceiling player than Vucevic. He's been given 20,000+ minutes to prove himself useful in some way or another and it hasn't yet materialized.

This is your typical bull***t post.
Vučević materialized into career 17 ppg, 10 rpg guy who made allstar team twice in his life.
Mo Bamba materlized into terrible center who can't even start on 3rd worst team in nba during rebuild. 23 years old player who probably won't last in nba pass age of 26.
IT's very obvious who is more talented. Hint. It's not guy you claim.
You allegedly project outcomes. Outcome are clear and loud. 30 years old allstar, 23 years old bench scrub. YOu just elect to defend wrong opinion just like you kept burning on Ellfrid Payton shield along with few other moderators.
Ghoust of Elfrid Payton is brought every time when you go on this type of " i know everything " road where you try to soooo hard to make it sound like you are 100% right and know everything. When in reality you kept defending one of worst starting PGs in nba for years. Just own your bias like Sould did. I own my Hezonja BS.

I'm not even stanning for Sengun. I just find him preferable to the other guys that aren't at the top of this prospect pool. He has demonstrated mastery of the Turkish Super League at the age of 18. That's impressive to me. But now this is going to become a thing because it offends your Vucevic-centric universe.


League where Andrew Nicholson last year avearged 21 ppg on 4,5 apg ,4 rpg, shot 39% for 3 and draw 6,3 fouls.


Anyway, since i'm 100% sure that i'm only person who actually SAW HIM PLAY IN REAL GAMES i think my word holds way more value than somebody who saw 5 min of highlights and decided to make laughable claim he has better post game than top 5 center in NBA.
So back to Alperen Şengün. Shows no range in jumpshot, does not defend well pick& roll, is poor athlete, 6'9, best used as small ball center who also struggles a lot against more phyiscal players.
There is something to be said about player who allows third string Croatia center to score 30 in qualifications game where both teams score below 85 points.[/quote]

Yeah. I'll stick with my own ability to read talent. You are the guy that has watched Vucevic in the post for a decade and still haven't figured out that he isn't any good at scoring in the low post.

You can average 17 points and 10 rebounds per game over the course of a career and still remain completely ineffectual. It's just a matter of opportunities. **** organizations build around ineffectual players and that's why they lose a lot of games.

What year do you think this is? What country do you think I live in? Do you know what youtube is?





If you have watched him play, then why do you keep calling him a bad athlete? The dude does 360 dunks in games. He had a massive chase-down block to secure the win in their 20-point comeback in the first game of their series against Tofas. He gets up and down the floor quickly when he wants to, albeit not exactly gracefully. He isn't terrible at defending the pick and roll, they simply play drop coverage. There is a lot he needs to clean up, but he isn't immobile. He has some bad habits. He obviously watches Jokic play as he takes plays off just as Jokic does. He won't even head up court on some fast breaks. He'll throw a long outlet and then just watch. He catches alley oops and has big throw downs in pretty much every game he plays. He isn't a great athlete, but we can still draw distinctions here. Ahtleticism isn't boolean. When was the last time you saw Vucevic catch an alley oop or do a 360 dunk? So can we agree that Sengun falls somewhere in the spectrum between Michael Jordan and Nikola Vucevic?
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
User avatar
GelbeWand09
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,887
And1: 2,213
Joined: Apr 17, 2018
       

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#138 » by GelbeWand09 » Sun May 16, 2021 8:35 pm

Knightro wrote:
Xatticus wrote:Moody’s shooting profile isn’t anywhere near what Redick’s was. Nobody in this class is Redick. The only one I’d have as being somewhat close is Hyland. There are 3 predictors for 3-point ability: FT%, 3PAr, and 3P%.

I want to point out that Moody’s numbers are inflated because he played a lot of minutes. He had a decent rebound rate and a good free throw rate. His numbers are otherwise rather pedestrian. I think people are seeing something more in him because his per game numbers are better than the other wing prospects in his tier, but that’s all about his minutes. He really isn’t all that appealing unless you believe his shooting is vastly superior to what he demonstrated this year.


I do think a good chunk of Moody's perceived value is tied into his age. He's still 18 years old.

One of the younger players in the class. The only guys I know for sure that are younger are Sengun and Kuminga.


Springer & Giddey are younger too
User avatar
Xatticus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,813
And1: 8,320
Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Location: the land of the blind
         

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#139 » by Xatticus » Sun May 16, 2021 8:37 pm

Knightro wrote:
Xatticus wrote:Moody’s shooting profile isn’t anywhere near what Redick’s was. Nobody in this class is Redick. The only one I’d have as being somewhat close is Hyland. There are 3 predictors for 3-point ability: FT%, 3PAr, and 3P%.

I want to point out that Moody’s numbers are inflated because he played a lot of minutes. He had a decent rebound rate and a good free throw rate. His numbers are otherwise rather pedestrian. I think people are seeing something more in him because his per game numbers are better than the other wing prospects in his tier, but that’s all about his minutes. He really isn’t all that appealing unless you believe his shooting is vastly superior to what he demonstrated this year.


I do think a good chunk of Moody's perceived value is tied into his age. He's still 18 years old.

One of the younger players in the class. The only guys I know for sure that are younger are Sengun and Kuminga.


I agree. I'm not saying I dislike Moody. Springer is also really young. I think the reason why Moody is getting the benefit of the doubt between the two is because of his per game numbers though, but the per 40 numbers are rather comparable. Moody shot more. Springer shot better. I'd probably go with Springer between the two because of the playmaking potential, which just isn't there with Moody.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 29,256
And1: 8,522
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who are you eyeing with the Chicago pick? 

Post#140 » by RookieStar » Sun May 16, 2021 9:37 pm

First off... where do you guys see Moody with JJ in comparison? If anything else, Moody plays like James HArden that's why Im not so high on him compared to a Bouknight.

JJ runs around screens/picks to get himself open and either shoots the 3 or gives the ball up to an open teammate. Moody to me likes to barrell down the defender and since he is 6'6'-6'7 compared to the usual NCAA SG of 6;3-6'5, he usually has the advantage in getting a shot off.

Return to Orlando Magic