ImageImageImageImage

magic propose vc for gil

Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior

User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,282
And1: 8,981
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#141 » by drsd » Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:48 am

The Washington Wizards spoke with the Orlando Magic recently about a potential swap of Gilbert Arenas for Vince Carter, according to a league source with knowledge of the situation. The source added that the talks didn't get very far and that it was merely a "business as usual" exploratory conversation between teams around the NBA draft. "Nothing to it now," the source said.

... the possible deal. "Not going to happen," ...


Washington Post: Wizards, Magic discussed Gilbert Arenas-Vince Carter deal

..
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,332
And1: 11,680
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#142 » by j-ragg » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:08 am

drsd wrote:
The Washington Wizards spoke with the Orlando Magic recently about a potential swap of Gilbert Arenas for Vince Carter, according to a league source with knowledge of the situation. The source added that the talks didn't get very far and that it was merely a "business as usual" exploratory conversation between teams around the NBA draft. "Nothing to it now," the source said.

... the possible deal. "Not going to happen," ...


Washington Post: Wizards, Magic discussed Gilbert Arenas-Vince Carter deal

..


By Michael Lee | June 24, 2010; 12:29 AM ET
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
User avatar
EasternMagic
RealGM
Posts: 15,459
And1: 1,154
Joined: Oct 17, 2007

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#143 » by EasternMagic » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:18 am

j-ragg wrote:
drsd wrote:
The Washington Wizards spoke with the Orlando Magic recently about a potential swap of Gilbert Arenas for Vince Carter, according to a league source with knowledge of the situation. The source added that the talks didn't get very far and that it was merely a "business as usual" exploratory conversation between teams around the NBA draft. "Nothing to it now," the source said.

... the possible deal. "Not going to happen," ...


Washington Post: Wizards, Magic discussed Gilbert Arenas-Vince Carter deal

..


By Michael Lee | June 24, 2010; 12:29 AM ET

this article is almost a month old
SolidSnake008
Banned User
Posts: 9,653
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 02, 2009
Location: ( .Y. )
Contact:

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#144 » by SolidSnake008 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:34 am

ba1487 wrote:If we get Arenas, he needs to drop the number 0. I hate that crap. No, you wouldn't drop 80 on duke, no, you couldn't drop 60 on Portland the year you made that claim and scored like 20 points combined in your two meetings, and no, you can't pull a gun out in our locker room because Dwight would grab the gun, smash it in his hand, and bludgeon you to death with your own weapon.

Please Otis, don't get this clown.

Image
MickaelPietrus
Banned User
Posts: 4,252
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 07, 2010

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#145 » by MickaelPietrus » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:37 am

Nolimit1211 wrote:FOR ANYONE AGAINST THIS TRADE: Seeing how this trade would involve phsyicals to make sure Gil is healthy, and the WIz apperantly are willing to throw in a 1st rounder, and that we're not gonna be cap friendly anytime soon either way annnd gortat could land us a nice player from a 3rd team, and lastly that Gil sh*ts on Vince, add to that Gil has paid his dues and admitted his faults, why in the hell wouldnt you want this trade to go down?!


A. He is 6'4 but his true position is PG. He has a much better passing game and court vision than Nelson but that means that either Nelson heads to bench or he plays the 2.

B. His contract is horrendous.

C. VC is an expiring.

D. Gil is just as washed up as Vince is.
SolidSnake008
Banned User
Posts: 9,653
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 02, 2009
Location: ( .Y. )
Contact:

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#146 » by SolidSnake008 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:47 am

MickaelPietrus wrote:
Nolimit1211 wrote:FOR ANYONE AGAINST THIS TRADE: Seeing how this trade would involve phsyicals to make sure Gil is healthy, and the WIz apperantly are willing to throw in a 1st rounder, and that we're not gonna be cap friendly anytime soon either way annnd gortat could land us a nice player from a 3rd team, and lastly that Gil sh*ts on Vince, add to that Gil has paid his dues and admitted his faults, why in the hell wouldnt you want this trade to go down?!


A. He is 6'4 but his true position is PG. He has a much better passing game and court vision than Nelson but that means that either Nelson heads to bench or he plays the 2.

B. His contract is horrendous.

C. VC is an expiring.

D. Gil is just as washed up as Vince is.

Image
SmiteaDwight
Banned User
Posts: 2,425
And1: 14
Joined: May 31, 2010

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#147 » by SmiteaDwight » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:33 am

Vince Carter for the Nets in 08-09:

43.7 FG% / 20.8 PPG

Nets record: 34-48

Gilbert Arenas last season:

41.1 FG% / 22.6 PPG

The Wiz were 14-24 went he got suspended.

I make this comparison because they were both number 1 options for bad teams.

.......

DON'T DO IT OTIS!!!!

theyre basically the same guy
User avatar
MagicHolland
General Manager
Posts: 7,620
And1: 312
Joined: Apr 15, 2004
 

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#148 » by MagicHolland » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:40 am

magicman123 wrote:orlandomagiczone. "where everybody is an insider"


"Sign up now, and get YOUR own source!"
User avatar
BelgianMagic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,888
And1: 130
Joined: Feb 02, 2010
       

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#149 » by BelgianMagic » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:10 am

And exactly why do people wanna keep vince because he has en expiring contract?? Do people still believe we can outright sign a player of that salary?? WE WILL STILL BE OVER THE CAP ! Anything we can get for Vince is better than nothing at all ..
User avatar
Jiwol
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,025
And1: 1,397
Joined: Feb 13, 2002
 

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#150 » by Jiwol » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:13 am

BelgianMagic wrote:And exactly why do people wanna keep vince because he has en expiring contract?? Do people still believe we can outright sign a player of that salary?? WE WILL STILL BE OVER THE CAP ! Anything we can get for Vince is better than nothing at all ..


That. We are **** until Rashard's contract expires.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,456
And1: 11,659
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#151 » by Wizardspride » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:07 am

SmiteaDwight wrote:Vince Carter for the Nets in 08-09:

43.7 FG% / 20.8 PPG

Nets record: 34-48

Gilbert Arenas last season:

41.1 FG% / 22.6 PPG

The Wiz were 14-24 went he got suspended.

I make this comparison because they were both number 1 options for bad teams.

.......

DON'T DO IT OTIS!!!!

theyre basically the same guy


You can't just look at raw numbers without taking into account other factors.

Such as the fact that Caron was having a bad season as well which in large part accounted for the record.

Trust me, Arenas is by far the superior player at this point.
Magicfan94
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,608
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 19, 2005

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#152 » by Magicfan94 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:53 am

BelgianMagic wrote:And exactly why do people wanna keep vince because he has en expiring contract?? Do people still believe we can outright sign a player of that salary?? WE WILL STILL BE OVER THE CAP ! Anything we can get for Vince is better than nothing at all ..


EVERYONE is forgetting the team has a player option on Vince that they can choose to pick up and thus, use as an expiring contract next year.

This whole idea though, get something while you can, is foolish. Picking up Arenas's contract when he's a big question mark is basically nailing yourself to the wall for another hell contract for 4 years. The Magic have plenty of pieces to move if they see fit to pull a deal in the future. Relax.
http://www.MagicPlayoffBeard.com - Win Playoff tickets!!!
Magicfan94
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,608
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 19, 2005

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#153 » by Magicfan94 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:54 am

Wizardspride wrote:
SmiteaDwight wrote:Vince Carter for the Nets in 08-09:

43.7 FG% / 20.8 PPG

Nets record: 34-48

Gilbert Arenas last season:

41.1 FG% / 22.6 PPG

The Wiz were 14-24 went he got suspended.

I make this comparison because they were both number 1 options for bad teams.

.......

DON'T DO IT OTIS!!!!

theyre basically the same guy


You can't just look at raw numbers without taking into account other factors.

Such as the fact that Caron was having a bad season as well which in large part accounted for the record.

Trust me, Arenas is by far the superior player at this point.


And a guy who hasn't played even HALF a season in three years. It's not happening.
http://www.MagicPlayoffBeard.com - Win Playoff tickets!!!
User avatar
doct3r dr3
RealGM
Posts: 12,535
And1: 2,574
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Location: Florouqaminu
 

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#154 » by doct3r dr3 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:22 pm

Haven't you saps figured out yet that if it's a "rumor" of a deal on the table, and not a "report" of a deal being finalized, it's a hoax?
Image
BadMofoPimp wrote:Reached for a 2nd round talent in Nicholson.
User avatar
magicman123
RealGM
Posts: 26,171
And1: 722
Joined: Jan 14, 2007
Location: "THO"
   

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#155 » by magicman123 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:40 pm

this topic is still goin on??????
User avatar
LBPTarHeel27
RealGM
Posts: 11,833
And1: 1,512
Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Location: Right behind you
   

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#156 » by LBPTarHeel27 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:47 pm

Magicfan94 wrote:
BelgianMagic wrote:And exactly why do people wanna keep vince because he has en expiring contract?? Do people still believe we can outright sign a player of that salary?? WE WILL STILL BE OVER THE CAP ! Anything we can get for Vince is better than nothing at all ..


EVERYONE is forgetting the team has a player option on Vince that they can choose to pick up and thus, use as an expiring contract next year.

This whole idea though, get something while you can, is foolish. Picking up Arenas's contract when he's a big question mark is basically nailing yourself to the wall for another hell contract for 4 years. The Magic have plenty of pieces to move if they see fit to pull a deal in the future. Relax.



Just thought I'd point out that your statement makes no sense. How can the TEAM have a PLAYER Option? It is a TEAM Option, big difference. And no...not "EVERYONE" has forgotten.

I do agree that making a trade just for the sake of making a trade is a bad move.

We will have plenty of chances to trade Vince. He is basically an expiring this summer, at the trade deadline, next summer, and the following trade deadline...His contract will eventually land us the player we want, we just have to be patient and not rush in to trading for someone like Gilbert Arenas.
Image
Optimus_Steel
RealGM
Posts: 38,282
And1: 12,215
Joined: Sep 16, 2003
Location: Winter Garden, FL
   

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#157 » by Optimus_Steel » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:55 pm

LBPTarHeel27 wrote:
Magicfan94 wrote:
BelgianMagic wrote:And exactly why do people wanna keep vince because he has en expiring contract?? Do people still believe we can outright sign a player of that salary?? WE WILL STILL BE OVER THE CAP ! Anything we can get for Vince is better than nothing at all ..


EVERYONE is forgetting the team has a player option on Vince that they can choose to pick up and thus, use as an expiring contract next year.

This whole idea though, get something while you can, is foolish. Picking up Arenas's contract when he's a big question mark is basically nailing yourself to the wall for another hell contract for 4 years. The Magic have plenty of pieces to move if they see fit to pull a deal in the future. Relax.



Just thought I'd point out that your statement makes no sense. How can the TEAM have a PLAYER Option? It is a TEAM Option, big difference. And no...not "EVERYONE" has forgotten.

I do agree that making a trade just for the sake of making a trade is a bad move.

We will have plenty of chances to trade Vince. He is basically an expiring this summer, at the trade deadline, next summer, and the following trade deadline...His contract will eventually land us the player we want, we just have to be patient and not rush in to trading for someone like Gilbert Arenas.


Thats what I have been preaching to everyone who wants to trade VC for the sake of getting rid of him. VC's contract is gonna be much more valuable in January/February than right now. Otis knows this.
Logicjbr
Rookie
Posts: 1,041
And1: 86
Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#158 » by Logicjbr » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:56 pm

VGOSWAMI wrote:Agent 0 put up 22 ppg and 7 apg. He's a better scorer and playmaker than VC. But this is risky financially. I can't say that I wouldn't love to have his talents here. He is an upgrade at the shooting guard position.



I'm curious to see how Arenas would play being the starting sg. He's really the type of player that makes plays for himself....usually needs ball in hands...
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,946
And1: 14,873
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#159 » by tiderulz » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:02 pm

prorl wrote:Thats what I have been preaching to everyone who wants to trade VC for the sake of getting rid of him. VC's contract is gonna be much more valuable in January/February than right now. Otis knows this.


it's a gamble. I am not a proponent of making a trade to make a trade.

But there is a chance that any player that would actually help us is on a team doing good and therefor not available. There were really only 2 trades made at the deadline last year that were worth anything.

Z to Cleveland for Jamison - turned out not to be worth as much as thought

Butler/Haywood/Stevenson for Gooden/Ross/Howard/Singleton. That propelled Dallas but did nothing for Washington.

I guess it takes a great GM with good scouting, something we dont always have if you judge by our draft picks. VC's value is a little higher right now because it is a known commodity, an expiring contract. Anyone targeted right now has lower value for the most part. As the season goes on, they will either play good and their value will raise, or they will play bad and their value will drop, but if they are playing bad why would we want to trade for them. Kind of a Catch-22
User avatar
BelgianMagic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,888
And1: 130
Joined: Feb 02, 2010
       

Re: magic propose vc for gil 

Post#160 » by BelgianMagic » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:17 pm

Magicfan94 wrote:EVERYONE is forgetting the team has a player option on Vince that they can choose to pick up and thus, use as an expiring contract next year.

This whole idea though, get something while you can, is foolish. Picking up Arenas's contract when he's a big question mark is basically nailing yourself to the wall for another hell contract for 4 years. The Magic have plenty of pieces to move if they see fit to pull a deal in the future. Relax.

Did someone teach you how to take things out of its context like this? Cause you're doin a great job :D

I know very well how Vince's contract is. I know very well bout that option, but I was just responding to all those people who say "let Vince expire, then sign another superstar" which we can't, even you know that. I was just pointing out that we can't to a New York or Chicago or Miami and let contracts expire to sign max deals, that's what I wanted to say.

Return to Orlando Magic