VFX wrote:Well, that idea goes out the window if Paolo and Franz are combining for 35-40 shot attempts nightly instead.
And yet... Paolo and Franz's FGA per game and usage are both *dramatically* down from last year.
Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

VFX wrote:Well, that idea goes out the window if Paolo and Franz are combining for 35-40 shot attempts nightly instead.
Knightro wrote:VFX wrote:Well, that idea goes out the window if Paolo and Franz are combining for 35-40 shot attempts nightly instead.
And yet... Paolo and Franz's FGA per game and usage are both *dramatically* down from last year.


VFX wrote:Knightro wrote:VFX wrote:Well, that idea goes out the window if Paolo and Franz are combining for 35-40 shot attempts nightly instead.
And yet... Paolo and Franz's FGA per game and usage are both *dramatically* down from last year.
And why do you think that is?

Knightro wrote:VFX wrote:Knightro wrote:
And yet... Paolo and Franz's FGA per game and usage are both *dramatically* down from last year.
And why do you think that is?
I don't love making sweeping proclamations about things 6-7 games into the season anyway.

VFX wrote:True, but you can easily see how new players are, or aren't, being incorporated into the current system.
His 3pa have gone down tremendously compared to the Memphis system granting him more possessions and looks in the open court. Going from nearly 9 attempts per game to 4.4 is just a completely different player. Its like nobody here is capable of understanding volume, efficiency, and comfort when it comes to consistent shot diet.
Maybe that completely changes. Yeah, its not great to make statements based on 7 games worth of data.
However, there is a specific faction in this fanbase that will say the same exact **** when the season ends and Bane's numbers drop completely off from who he was supposed to be when acquired.
Knightro wrote:VFX wrote:True, but you can easily see how new players are, or aren't, being incorporated into the current system.
His 3pa have gone down tremendously compared to the Memphis system granting him more possessions and looks in the open court. Going from nearly 9 attempts per game to 4.4 is just a completely different player. Its like nobody here is capable of understanding volume, efficiency, and comfort when it comes to consistent shot diet.
Maybe that completely changes. Yeah, its not great to make statements based on 7 games worth of data.
However, there is a specific faction in this fanbase that will say the same exact **** when the season ends and Bane's numbers drop completely off from who he was supposed to be when acquired.
Some of that falls on coaching and scheme certainly, but some of it falls on Bane too IMO.
He has seemingly got in his own head a little bit about starting so cold from 3PT and has ultimately passed up on quite a few opportunities - at least more than you'd like to see from such a traditionally great shooter - for open and semi open threes to instead drive the basketball.

VFX wrote:I just have a hard time imagining Bane being incorporated into this specific system based on how it currently operates and how it has operated in recent years.
Pushing pace at the beginning of the season and Mosely claiming "they lacked conditioning" in preseason seems like the most obvious way of changing the system for Bane. Unfortunately that backfired and looked pretty bad to start the season, so they went back to what worked.
If the idea is that nobody expected Bane to be anything remotely close to the same player he was over the course of the last 2-3 seasons, then fine. It's a hard sell to think that he is merely "overthinking things" and that it has nothing to do with the fact that his role on the court is going to get significantly less looks due to less ball movement, opportunities, and possessions to do so. Those just aren't the tendencies we have seen with the guys that have the ball 70% of the time.
Knightro wrote:VFX wrote:I just have a hard time imagining Bane being incorporated into this specific system based on how it currently operates and how it has operated in recent years.
Pushing pace at the beginning of the season and Mosely claiming "they lacked conditioning" in preseason seems like the most obvious way of changing the system for Bane. Unfortunately that backfired and looked pretty bad to start the season, so they went back to what worked.
If the idea is that nobody expected Bane to be anything remotely close to the same player he was over the course of the last 2-3 seasons, then fine. It's a hard sell to think that he is merely "overthinking things" and that it has nothing to do with the fact that his role on the court is going to get significantly less looks due to less ball movement, opportunities, and possessions to do so. Those just aren't the tendencies we have seen with the guys that have the ball 70% of the time.
I feel like we're just saying stuff a little bit here.
The Wizards game was one of the fastest paced games the Magic have played in the last three years for whatever that's worth. So the idea that they stopped pushing the pace really isn't accurate to say in this case.
And again... through the first six games, Bane's overall FG attempts and USG% was essentially the same as was in Memphis a season ago. The sample size being so small that one game can skew the numbers somewhat significantly down.
And if the Magic are going to have a game where they score efficiently and play really good team defense, I'm just not going to be all that upset about Bane shooting just 6 times. He was involved in the game in other ways, 5 to 0 assist to turnover ratio. Got a couple of steals. He only played 20 minutes and that's really fine.

KillMonger wrote:Anybody remember seeing a Bane/Franz P&R?
Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app
Interesting.....could've swore we would have some data on this by alas... We're really not using Bane to his full potentialBensational wrote:KillMonger wrote:Anybody remember seeing a Bane/Franz P&R?
Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app
They’re rarely used together so far, ey? Looking at lineups and passing data, it looks like the team is focusing on getting the Paolo/Bane pairing going first, and Franz and Tyus/AB are another lineup.

drsd wrote:(Banchero) is shooting 47 percent of his attempts at the rim (a career-best), while attempting 32 percent of his shots in the mid-range (career low) with fewer 3-point attempts (20 percent 3PAr, career low).
[url=https://www.si.com/nba/magic/onsi/news/magic-star-has-modified-his-shot-diet-for-the-better-01k959g72mbg]SI.com link[url]
This is a good story that Banchero's efficiency is improving because his shot selection is better. Good.

SOUL wrote:I feel like everybody is wanting everything at once or even everything all together when that's just not feasible. People already wanting to "go back to last year" and not run fast and play defense first + put the ball back in the hands of Franz/Paolo again instead of Suggs/Black, but also incorporate Bane more... all somehow while making sure nobody else gets frozen out of the offense and the ball continues moving.. it's just a lot of things people are demanding/complaining about when it just really needs to be simplified.
If the simple thing is simply going back to the offense they know last year but not having 2/3rds of the team shoot historic lows from three while Bane gets acclimated.. I'm fine with that. As long as we learn how to incorporate Bane by mid-season.
Cam Johnson is also massively struggling on a new team as well as some other players.