Official Speculation Thread (Pt XIV, Mods Close))

The Real Dalic · Post #1401 » by **The Real Dalic** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:34 am

Blue_and_Whte wrote:Harris, Beas, and Blatche........ Seems disfunctional
Fan of the Harris, Jackson, and Beas trade

fbeye343 · Post #1402 » by **fbeye343** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:34 am

Ryan and Jameer for gasol

warren4prez · Post #1403 » by **warren4prez** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:35 am

TheDarkKnight wrote:We are waiting for a miracle trade to happen but most of these trade scenarios involving Monta Ellis and Steve Nash have a low change of happening. I decided to play with the trade machine and come up with the best and most realistic trade we can make.
With Minnesota if they can't get Crawford then we can send them J Rich since they need a SG, we could send them JJ but i chose JRich instead because of his longer deal and the fact the Wolves have stated they would like move veteran help to balance out their young roster.
With Washington they are looking to move Blatche and some veterans to balance out all the young players they got.
With Cleavland they can get better deal from other teams that need PG help but if the other available ones ( R. Felton, D. Harris, A. Miller) are already moved then we can strike a good proposal like i have show by sending them players that won't hurt their salary cap that they clearly want to preserve.
With Milwaukee they want to move S. Jackson pretty bad and very few teams would want him other than us plus his value is pretty low right now so we can control the players we send them more in our favor and keep our good assets for dealing with other teams.
If we make a drastic splash of a trade like reports are stating we want to make that that helps us put better players around Dwight then i believe these are out most realistic options.
I Know lots of people here do not think too high of M.Beasley but he can create his own shot and SVG should be able to get the best out of him. With the trade of Swapping Jameer for Harris its just a clean swap for too PGs that need a change of scenery .
anyways , im interested to hear what you guys think of these trades.

You had some good deals, I don't want A. Blatche on this team if they can get rid of Big Baby cool but to bring in blatche who is more dumber would not be wise.

warren4prez · Post #1404 » by **warren4prez** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:38 am

arkknight1988 wrote:
warren4prez wrote:
DJRajX wrote:Dwight Howard on Trade Rumors, It's out of our control
http://www.vybzentertainment.com/exclus ... ntrol.html

NBA Trade Rumors – 3/7/12- Dwight Howard Still In Limbo
http://news.fanfeedr.com/2012/03/07/nba ... mors-3712/

Orlando needs to make these 2 trades

We get an expiring
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=76dm3q5

This trade is risky but I will take the risk..
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7ccgtt9

did u really trade anderson for sjax?

Did you not see who else is part of the deal.. I said its risky!!! But we get back a pretty decent replacement.

Reverse_Angle · Post #1405 » by **Reverse_Angle** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:56 am

i miss having a fast player in the team.

p.s. save the ish remarks please.

TheDarkKnight · Post #1406 » by **TheDarkKnight** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:58 am

Blue_and_Whte wrote:Harris, Beas, and Blatche........ Seems disfunctional
Fan of the Harris, Jackson, and Beas trade

you are right , that is probably the best combination and on top of that none of their current deals are over 2 years.

warren4prez wrote:
You had some good deals, I don't want A. Blatche on this team if they can get rid of Big Baby cool but to bring in blatche who is more dumber would not be wise.

I don't really want him either but if it turns out that is the only way to get rid of Big Baby then i would take it.

WeAreVenom · Post #1407 » by **WeAreVenom** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:59 am

G-Heel wrote:
ZeusIsLoose wrote:Sam Amick of SI reportiong:
Yet while there would be even more reason for optimism if the Magic could find some help for Howard, two sources close to the situation said their reported attempt to land Ellis simply never happened. Warriors owner Joe Lacob is obsessed with the far-fetched thought of landing Howard himself, and chances are he wouldn't green-light any move -- even if it was a three- or four-team situation -- that helped Orlando keep Howard.

Is the owner (Please Use More Appropriate Word)? They don't have enough assets to trade for Dwight. Even if they do, would they give it all to rent Dwight for 2 months?

Seriously.

Any deal would have to start with Curry and Klay, they really don't have too much outside of that. Unless they take on a boatload of bad contracts......which would be outright stupid, considering Dwight has told you he won't stay.

Do they seriously want to do this? Like, really? I don't understand, at all.

toquito · Post #1408 » by **toquito** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:02 am

thug team for the win! http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=87oqbmg randomness...

Blue_and_Whte · Post #1409 » by **Blue_and_Whte** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:03 am

warren4prez wrote:
TheDarkKnight wrote:We are waiting for a miracle trade to happen but most of these trade scenarios involving Monta Ellis and Steve Nash have a low change of happening. I decided to play with the trade machine and come up with the best and most realistic trade we can make.
With Minnesota if they can't get Crawford then we can send them J Rich since they need a SG, we could send them JJ but i chose JRich instead because of his longer deal and the fact the Wolves have stated they would like move veteran help to balance out their young roster.
With Washington they are looking to move Blatche and some veterans to balance out all the young players they got.
With Cleavland they can get better deal from other teams that need PG help but if the other available ones ( R. Felton, D. Harris, A. Miller) are already moved then we can strike a good proposal like i have show by sending them players that won't hurt their salary cap that they clearly want to preserve.
With Milwaukee they want to move S. Jackson pretty bad and very few teams would want him other than us plus his value is pretty low right now so we can control the players we send them more in our favor and keep our good assets for dealing with other teams.
If we make a drastic splash of a trade like reports are stating we want to make that that helps us put better players around Dwight then i believe these are out most realistic options.
I Know lots of people here do not think too high of M.Beasley but he can create his own shot and SVG should be able to get the best out of him. With the trade of Swapping Jameer for Harris its just a clean swap for too PGs that need a change of scenery .
anyways , im interested to hear what you guys think of these trades.

You had some good deals, I don't want A. Blatche on this team if they can get rid of Big Baby cool but to bring in blatche who is more dumber would not be wise.

baby is a smarter defender than Blatche. No to Andre dude is an idiot.

Blue_and_Whte · Post #1410 » by **Blue_and_Whte** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:06 am

warren4prez wrote:Did you not see who else is part of the deal.. I said its risky!!! But we get back a pretty decent replacement.

iffy on that. Anderson is a better fit than Illiasova imo and we really dont know what were getting with Jax

Reverse_Angle · Post #1411 » by **Reverse_Angle** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:06 am

GSW are misguided. they think they have a "you do not get players from us, we get players from other teams" caliber franchise, but in reality they have a "posturing does not make up for everything and we are not aware of that" type of franchise.

ADRajX · Post #1412 » by **ADRajX** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:16 am

Reverse_Angle wrote:GSW are misguided. they think they have a "you do not get players from us, we get players from other teams" caliber franchise, but in reality they have a "posturing does not make up for everything and we are not aware of that" type of franchise.

I feel the same way... GS comes off as completely idiotic... like a 4 thinking she's a 10 :wink:

Post #1413 » by **Def Swami** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:16 am

Steve Kyler ‏ @stevekylerNBA
RT @JeffreyRLove: what would the Lakers have to give up for Sessions?? ---> A draft pick for sure... or someone like Darius Morris

Doesn't seem like much imo.

ADRajX · Post #1414 » by **ADRajX** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:18 am

VGOSWAMI wrote:
Steve Kyler ‏ @stevekylerNBA
RT @JeffreyRLove: what would the Lakers have to give up for Sessions?? ---> A draft pick for sure... or someone like Darius Morris

Doesn't seem like much imo.

... we can offer something better than that for sure

WeAreVenom · Post #1415 » by **WeAreVenom** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:19 am

OT: Did anyone see what Adonis posted in that other topic, before The Man shut him down?

The Real Dalic · Post #1416 » by **The Real Dalic** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:20 am

DJRajX wrote:
VGOSWAMI wrote:
Steve Kyler ‏ @stevekylerNBA
RT @JeffreyRLove: what would the Lakers have to give up for Sessions?? ---> A draft pick for sure... or someone like Darius Morris

Doesn't seem like much imo.

... we can offer something better than that for sure

ADRajX · Post #1417 » by **ADRajX** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:20 am

WeAreVenom wrote:OT: Did anyone see what Adonis posted in that other topic, before The Man shut him down?

Adonis returned? ... oh boy

what happened?

The Real Dalic · Post #1418 » by **The Real Dalic** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:20 am

WeAreVenom wrote:OT: Did anyone see what Adonis posted in that other topic, before The Man shut him down?

Nope.

ADRajX · Post #1419 » by **ADRajX** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:21 am

The Real Dalic wrote:
WeAreVenom wrote:OT: Did anyone see what Adonis posted in that other topic, before The Man shut him down?

Nope.

probably for the best huh lol

WeAreVenom · Post #1420 » by **WeAreVenom** » Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:22 am

DJRajX wrote:
WeAreVenom wrote:OT: Did anyone see what Adonis posted in that other topic, before The Man shut him down?

Adonis returned? ... oh boy

what happened?

Lol, oh yeah, you didn't see the (locked) topic? "What does Adonis think?"

His new name was 'thegod'.....LOL. Man, I wish we could just let that guy come back.