Tankapolooza: Draft Lottery Odds/Watch thread
Moderators: Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- PrimeThyme
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,570
- And1: 14,515
- Joined: May 25, 2016
- Location: Doak Campbell
-
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,812
- And1: 1,873
- Joined: Jul 06, 2012
- Location: Baltimore MD
-
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
teefbe wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:teefbe wrote:We're up 15 with 3 minutes to play in the 3rd. If we win today that might hurt our tank badly considering we have 2 games vs Nets ahead of us...Philly and Knicks down right now just gotta hope Westbrook somehow pulls this off
Yea this is very alarming.
Russel. Freakin. Westbrook. LMAOOOO WTF, he's unfair.
He's a special talent. Glad he performed today. We needed it
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- Nemesis21
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,228
- And1: 6,615
- Joined: Feb 11, 2006
- Location: Free Nemesis21
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
Was getting worried in the first half, thankfully Westbrook finally showed up
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- Viper1500
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,923
- And1: 2,801
- Joined: Apr 15, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
I am fully invested in Tatum. It'll be a huge let down if that's not our pick. Meaning we need to lose
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,996
- And1: 2,726
- Joined: Jul 31, 2009
- Location: Iceland
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
islanders11040 wrote:Well played Magic Tank.....well played....
Our tank was stuck in neutral for a while there, wasn't looking good, but we found a way to force it into D and bring home the L.
- Orlando Magic fan since 1991 -
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,418
- And1: 6,978
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
- Location: New York
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
Viper1500 wrote:I am fully invested in Tatum. It'll be a huge let down if that's not our pick. Meaning we need to lose
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
This kinda works out since knicks fans want either Dennis Smith Jr or De'Aaron Fox.
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- PrimeThyme
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,570
- And1: 14,515
- Joined: May 25, 2016
- Location: Doak Campbell
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
islanders11040 wrote:Viper1500 wrote:I am fully invested in Tatum. It'll be a huge let down if that's not our pick. Meaning we need to lose
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
This kinda works out since knicks fans want either Dennis Smith Jr or De'Aaron Fox.
Yeah it does. That's why I see Philly and Sacramento as the true threats to both our tanks. Sacramento would take Tatum or a guard and Philly would do the same.

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,341
- And1: 2,337
- Joined: Mar 06, 2003
- Location: Edinburgh, UK
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
Thought we might see a Sixers win last night.
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- drsd
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,124
- And1: 8,928
- Joined: Mar 16, 2003
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
Bensational wrote:I'd be stoked with either. Tatum is a perfect fit as a scorer that can take on Vogel's Paul George playbook. Plus he looks like he knows how and when to make a pass, too.
Jackson would be great, too. I want this team to get better passers on the wings, and he knows how to make a pass. But he's gonna take time to adapt. His shot will come, but I doubt we risk a pick on another shooting project unless he's BPA.
The Magic needs shooting. If the team ends up with the 2 or 3 pick, I could see a great trade-down for Isaac and a future first. It fists team needs and creates further assets. Boston could be a nice trade partner here if the Celt's pick falls.
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,731
- And1: 4,876
- Joined: Jul 31, 2013
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
drsd wrote:Bensational wrote:I'd be stoked with either. Tatum is a perfect fit as a scorer that can take on Vogel's Paul George playbook. Plus he looks like he knows how and when to make a pass, too.
Jackson would be great, too. I want this team to get better passers on the wings, and he knows how to make a pass. But he's gonna take time to adapt. His shot will come, but I doubt we risk a pick on another shooting project unless he's BPA.
The Magic needs shooting. If the team ends up with the 2 or 3 pick, I could see a great trade-down for Isaac and a future first. It fists team needs and creates further assets. Boston could be a nice trade partner here if the Celt's pick falls.
Screw that. If we get the #2 pick we take Fultz or Ball with zero hesitation.
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- Junior
- Posts: 382
- And1: 417
- Joined: Feb 10, 2017
- Location: Orlando
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
drsd wrote:Bensational wrote:I'd be stoked with either. Tatum is a perfect fit as a scorer that can take on Vogel's Paul George playbook. Plus he looks like he knows how and when to make a pass, too.
Jackson would be great, too. I want this team to get better passers on the wings, and he knows how to make a pass. But he's gonna take time to adapt. His shot will come, but I doubt we risk a pick on another shooting project unless he's BPA.
The Magic needs shooting. If the team ends up with the 2 or 3 pick, I could see a great trade-down for Isaac and a future first. It fists team needs and creates further assets. Boston could be a nice trade partner here if the Celt's pick falls.
Not even the most incompetent GM (I'm looking at you, Otis!) would trade down and pass up the chance to nab a surefire superstar in Fultz or Ball. That's just straight up Weisbrodian.
this is my signature.
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,021
- And1: 6,242
- Joined: Jul 05, 2013
- Location: Altamonte Springs Fl
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
PrimeShaq wrote:islanders11040 wrote:Viper1500 wrote:I am fully invested in Tatum. It'll be a huge let down if that's not our pick. Meaning we need to lose
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
This kinda works out since knicks fans want either Dennis Smith Jr or De'Aaron Fox.
Yeah it does. That's why I see Philly and Sacramento as the true threats to both our tanks. Sacramento would take Tatum or a guard and Philly would do the same.
Would Philly? They have Embiid, Saric, Simmons, Okafor, and Covington. That's a lot of big bodies. Their roster seems to be in dire need of a PG more then anything else. TJ Mcconnell has some big cojones but the guy is a career backup PG. He is not a starter. I think Philly would take Fox and DJr before Tatum.
AS far as Knicks go, we pretty much know that they will be trading Melo this offseason. The fans may want Fox but if they trade Melo, Tatum becomes the perfect replacement.
Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- rusoopE
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,542
- And1: 683
- Joined: Dec 16, 2013
- Location: Patagonia
-
Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
PrimeShaq wrote:islanders11040 wrote:Viper1500 wrote:I am fully invested in Tatum. It'll be a huge let down if that's not our pick. Meaning we need to lose
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
This kinda works out since knicks fans want either Dennis Smith Jr or De'Aaron Fox.
Yeah it does. That's why I see Philly and Sacramento as the true threats to both our tanks. Sacramento would take Tatum or a guard and Philly would do the same.
What if we finish above the Lakers imagine number 3 i guess the Celtics will draft Jackson or Tatum. This means Ball or Fultz gonna be available. Should we draft one? (prolly Ball)
"It's like 60 minutes on acid" - David Byrne
Vuc and Isaac supporter
Vuc and Isaac supporter
Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- PrimeThyme
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,570
- And1: 14,515
- Joined: May 25, 2016
- Location: Doak Campbell
-
Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
OrlandoDream wrote:PrimeShaq wrote:islanders11040 wrote:This kinda works out since knicks fans want either Dennis Smith Jr or De'Aaron Fox.
Yeah it does. That's why I see Philly and Sacramento as the true threats to both our tanks. Sacramento would take Tatum or a guard and Philly would do the same.
Would Philly? They have Embiid, Saric, Simmons, Okafor, and Covington. That's a lot of big bodies. Their roster seems to be in dire need of a PG more then anything else. TJ Mcconnell has some big cojones but the guy is a career backup PG. He is not a starter. I think Philly would take Fox and DJr before Tatum.
AS far as Knicks go, we pretty much know that they will be trading Melo this offseason. The fans may want Fox but if they trade Melo, Tatum becomes the perfect replacement.
Philly has always been know to take the BPA no matter how deep they are at the position. Embiid when they had already drafted Noel, and then Okafor when they had already drafted Embiid. There's a chance they draft BPA again if they have the fourth pick and most believe that person is Tatum so we will have to see. They could always go after a PG like Holiday in free agency.
The Knicks could go either way especially if they decide to trade Melo. It's in Melos hands though with his NTC so it's no guarantee that he will be traded. We will just have to see how it all plays out. Hopefully we finish ahead of both of them and won't have to worry about it.

Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- PrimeThyme
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,570
- And1: 14,515
- Joined: May 25, 2016
- Location: Doak Campbell
-
Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
rusoopE wrote:PrimeShaq wrote:islanders11040 wrote:This kinda works out since knicks fans want either Dennis Smith Jr or De'Aaron Fox.
Yeah it does. That's why I see Philly and Sacramento as the true threats to both our tanks. Sacramento would take Tatum or a guard and Philly would do the same.
What if we finish above the Lakers imagine number 3 i guess the Celtics will draft Jackson or Tatum. This means Ball or Fultz gonna be available. Should we draft one? (prolly Ball)
Yeah if we finish in the top 3 and Ball or Fultz are there we have to take one of them. You can't pass on either of those guys.

Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- Viper1500
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,923
- And1: 2,801
- Joined: Apr 15, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
This first game against Brooklyn will be huge. I will never hope for an injury, but I'm hoping to see some of our players rest.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
- Nemesis21
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,228
- And1: 6,615
- Joined: Feb 11, 2006
- Location: Free Nemesis21
-
Re: RE: Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
rusoopE wrote:PrimeShaq wrote:islanders11040 wrote:This kinda works out since knicks fans want either Dennis Smith Jr or De'Aaron Fox.
Yeah it does. That's why I see Philly and Sacramento as the true threats to both our tanks. Sacramento would take Tatum or a guard and Philly would do the same.
What if we finish above the Lakers imagine number 3 i guess the Celtics will draft Jackson or Tatum. This means Ball or Fultz gonna be available. Should we draft one? (prolly Ball)
So you are saying imagine we finish ahead of LA, and get # 3. I'm pretty sure Boston takes Fultz. PHX will take Ball or Jackson, lets say they take Jackson since they have Bledsoe & Knight at PG and Booker at SG. So we are sitting here at 3, with Fultz & Jackson off the board, I'm taking Tatum at 3. Whoever is at 4, LA or NYK, winds up with Ball.
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,007
- And1: 1,518
- Joined: Nov 20, 2015
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
Uncommon wrote:drsd wrote:Bensational wrote:I'd be stoked with either. Tatum is a perfect fit as a scorer that can take on Vogel's Paul George playbook. Plus he looks like he knows how and when to make a pass, too.
Jackson would be great, too. I want this team to get better passers on the wings, and he knows how to make a pass. But he's gonna take time to adapt. His shot will come, but I doubt we risk a pick on another shooting project unless he's BPA.
The Magic needs shooting. If the team ends up with the 2 or 3 pick, I could see a great trade-down for Isaac and a future first. It fists team needs and creates further assets. Boston could be a nice trade partner here if the Celt's pick falls.
Not even the most incompetent GM (I'm looking at you, Otis!) would trade down and pass up the chance to nab a surefire superstar in Fultz or Ball. That's just straight up Weisbrodian.
Lmao ball is not a sure fire super star . He is a good passer but outside of that he is average , he literally cant left, ur falling for the hype Ball is fools gold ! Fultz is a tier above everyone else in the draft ! Ball looks like it will take years before he is good
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,035
- And1: 4,336
- Joined: Jul 18, 2009
-
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
Mc-o wrote:Uncommon wrote:drsd wrote:
The Magic needs shooting. If the team ends up with the 2 or 3 pick, I could see a great trade-down for Isaac and a future first. It fists team needs and creates further assets. Boston could be a nice trade partner here if the Celt's pick falls.
Not even the most incompetent GM (I'm looking at you, Otis!) would trade down and pass up the chance to nab a surefire superstar in Fultz or Ball. That's just straight up Weisbrodian.
Lmao ball is not a sure fire super star . He is a good passer but outside of that he is average , he literally cant left, ur falling for the hype Ball is fools gold ! Fultz is a tier above everyone else in the draft ! Ball looks like it will take years before he is good
I agree. Ball is not on the same tier as Fultz. It's hard to pinpoint what Ball's NBA game will really consist of outside passing/scoring in transition, shooting open set shots, and moving the ball on the perimeter. I've yet to see him run a P&R, shoot off the dribble going to his right, shoot mid range, or break the defense down off the dribble.
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,007
- And1: 1,518
- Joined: Nov 20, 2015
Re: Tankapolooza: UPDATED 3/15/17; 02:21 EST
Zmill wrote:Mc-o wrote:Uncommon wrote:
Not even the most incompetent GM (I'm looking at you, Otis!) would trade down and pass up the chance to nab a surefire superstar in Fultz or Ball. That's just straight up Weisbrodian.
Lmao ball is not a sure fire super star . He is a good passer but outside of that he is average , he literally cant left, ur falling for the hype Ball is fools gold ! Fultz is a tier above everyone else in the draft ! Ball looks like it will take years before he is good
I agree. Ball is not on the same tier as Fultz. It's hard to pinpoint what Ball's NBA game will really consist of outside passing/scoring in transition, shooting open set shots, and moving the ball on the perimeter. I've yet to see him run a P&R, shoot off the dribble going to his right, shoot mid range, or break the defense down off the dribble.
This !!! Now I think ball can be good just that expectations need to come down because I really don't see him as a franchise player and maybe not even an all star because the point guard position is so deep it will be hard for him to make one