BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD 1 - LOCK PLEASE!!!
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
-
TDJacksonville
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,229
- And1: 242
- Joined: Jun 29, 2012
- Location: Your girlfriends panties
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
ive got my top 3 coaching Board ready 
Trailblazers
PG:
SG:
F:
F:
C:
Wzajan89 @ gmail . com
PG:
SG:
F:
F:
C:
Wzajan89 @ gmail . com
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- Grinditout
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,618
- And1: 2,752
- Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
TDJacksonville wrote:ive got my top 3 coaching Board ready
The coaching picks will be interesting, you could get a HOF coach but if he doesn't fit your roster then it doesn't mean anything.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
-
TDJacksonville
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,229
- And1: 242
- Joined: Jun 29, 2012
- Location: Your girlfriends panties
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
Grinditout wrote:TDJacksonville wrote:ive got my top 3 coaching Board ready
The coaching picks will be interesting, you could get a HOF coach but if he doesn't fit your roster then it doesn't mean anything.
oh i agree. actually make that board 4 but the #4 guy is probably like the worst coach who will be picked.
Trailblazers
PG:
SG:
F:
F:
C:
Wzajan89 @ gmail . com
PG:
SG:
F:
F:
C:
Wzajan89 @ gmail . com
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
-
MagicFan32
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,953
- And1: 790
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
Selected Joakim Noah with my final pick, some of you will hate on it, but all i have to say is check the advanced stats, they completely validate my pick. especially his offensive and defensive rtg's
also fits my team, my bigs were lacking in a little skill, Noah is a very skilled passer and like my other bigs very good defensively, adds some efficiency and will do anything to win.
Overall I feel I have one of the best passing teams in this league
also fits my team, my bigs were lacking in a little skill, Noah is a very skilled passer and like my other bigs very good defensively, adds some efficiency and will do anything to win.
Overall I feel I have one of the best passing teams in this league
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- LBPTarHeel27
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,833
- And1: 1,512
- Joined: Jul 10, 2004
- Location: Right behind you
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
I love Noah but his chronic foot issues are a huge red flag, especially since his career is only a few years deep.

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- Grinditout
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,618
- And1: 2,752
- Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
MagicFan32 wrote:Selected Joakim Noah with my final pick, some of you will hate on it, but all i have to say is check the advanced stats, they completely validate my pick. especially his offensive and defensive rtg's
also fits my team, my bigs were lacking in a little skill, Noah is a very skilled passer and like my other bigs very good defensively, adds some efficiency and will do anything to win.
Overall I feel I have one of the best passing teams in this league
But your team is one of the better passing ones too.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- SOUL
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,343
- And1: 41,063
- Joined: Dec 11, 2006
- Location: Orl★ndo
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
wasnt starks picked?
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- Grinditout
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,618
- And1: 2,752
- Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
SOUL wrote:wasnt starks picked?
Nope, and as a Knick fan I'm glad he got in.
Although I think Spree8 should have gotten a true SF though....
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
-
MagicFan32
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,953
- And1: 790
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:I love Noah but his chronic foot issues are a huge red flag, especially since his career is only a few years deep.
yeah but we aren't projecting how much longer his career will be, all we have is what he's done and theorhetically in a backup role, i am saving his body.
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- Grinditout
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,618
- And1: 2,752
- Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
Still can't believe one guy is still available. I almost took him two rounds ago...
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,506
- And1: 9,177
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
Grinditout wrote:SOUL wrote:wasnt starks picked?
Nope, and as a Knick fan I'm glad he got in.
Although I think Spree8 should have gotten a true SF though....
Rip has played sf plenty...he's even listed as a guard-forward. Was gunna go with the X-Man (a bigger sf), but decided he could be risky with chemistry. Other than that, there's no better fit than Starks...happy I got him.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
-
Skin
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,516
- And1: 8,806
- Joined: Jul 03, 2009
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
Coaching picks are mostly meaningless. A good coach simply coaches to his players strength.
I'd be more critical of the judging on coaches if we had picked the coaches first and then built our teams around that.
I'd be more critical of the judging on coaches if we had picked the coaches first and then built our teams around that.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
-
Skin
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,516
- And1: 8,806
- Joined: Jul 03, 2009
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
Grinditout wrote:Still can't believe one guy is still available. I almost took him two rounds ago...
Imagine the reach you would've made.
At this point players are being passed up because teams have that position filled already.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- SOUL
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,343
- And1: 41,063
- Joined: Dec 11, 2006
- Location: Orl★ndo
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
i swore i saw starks like a lot of rounds ago.. strange
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- Grinditout
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,618
- And1: 2,752
- Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
spree8 wrote:Grinditout wrote:SOUL wrote:wasnt starks picked?
Nope, and as a Knick fan I'm glad he got in.
Although I think Spree8 should have gotten a true SF though....
Rip has played sf plenty...he's even listed as a guard-forward. Was gunna go with the X-Man (a bigger sf), but decided he could be risky with chemistry. Other than that, there's no better fit than Starks...happy I got him.
I was thinking of a former Maverick/Piston from the late 80s that would have been real nice, I'll let you know once the player draft is over.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,506
- And1: 9,177
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
Grinditout wrote:spree8 wrote:Grinditout wrote:Nope, and as a Knick fan I'm glad he got in.
Although I think Spree8 should have gotten a true SF though....
Rip has played sf plenty...he's even listed as a guard-forward. Was gunna go with the X-Man (a bigger sf), but decided he could be risky with chemistry. Other than that, there's no better fit than Starks...happy I got him.
I was thinking of a former Maverick/Piston from the late 80s that would have been real nice, I'll let you know once the player draft is over.
Isiah's boy huh? Thought of him, but wanted someone who could spread the floor, and pass (Starks dished 5-6 apg in his prime) with good defense. I think stylistically he's a perfect fit.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- bigdogdylan5
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,525
- And1: 2,320
- Joined: May 13, 2011
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
spree8 wrote:Grinditout wrote:spree8 wrote:
Rip has played sf plenty...he's even listed as a guard-forward. Was gunna go with the X-Man (a bigger sf), but decided he could be risky with chemistry. Other than that, there's no better fit than Starks...happy I got him.
I was thinking of a former Maverick/Piston from the late 80s that would have been real nice, I'll let you know once the player draft is over.
Isiah's boy huh? Thought of him, but wanted someone who could spread the floor, and pass (Starks dished 5-6 apg in his prime) with good defense. I think stylistically he's a perfect fit.
Are you talking about Dumars? I picked him ages ago
Fine print disclaimer for Fultz:
I am high on Markelle Fultz. Yes I understand he is not perfect and needs to shoot more and better and turn the ball over less. I would really like to see him play one more year… and I did and he sucks time to move on.
I am high on Markelle Fultz. Yes I understand he is not perfect and needs to shoot more and better and turn the ball over less. I would really like to see him play one more year… and I did and he sucks time to move on.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,506
- And1: 9,177
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- LBPTarHeel27
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,833
- And1: 1,512
- Joined: Jul 10, 2004
- Location: Right behind you
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
spree8 wrote:Na..Aguirre
Not sure if you realized it but you picked out of order, ahead of the person in front of you. No one seems to have cared, so that's fine...just pay closer attention, please.

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,506
- And1: 9,177
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:spree8 wrote:Na..Aguirre
Not sure if you realized it but you picked out of order, ahead of the person in front of you. No one seems to have cared, so that's fine...just pay closer attention, please.
People aren't numbering their picks, and when they get skipped and pick randomly later on they don't specify...when I count 196, and then another pick afterwards I'm assuming its 197...shouldn't have to be a detective especially when the first page with the results isn't updated either. Just sayin....this also happened earlier today when 4 picks were OTC. .








