ImageImageImageImage

BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD 1 - LOCK PLEASE!!!

Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior

TDJacksonville
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,229
And1: 242
Joined: Jun 29, 2012
Location: Your girlfriends panties

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1561 » by TDJacksonville » Sat Jul 27, 2013 12:58 am

ive got my top 3 coaching Board ready :P
Trailblazers
PG:
SG:
F:
F:
C:
Wzajan89 @ gmail . com
User avatar
Grinditout
RealGM
Posts: 10,618
And1: 2,752
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1562 » by Grinditout » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:05 am

TDJacksonville wrote:ive got my top 3 coaching Board ready :P

The coaching picks will be interesting, you could get a HOF coach but if he doesn't fit your roster then it doesn't mean anything.
TDJacksonville
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,229
And1: 242
Joined: Jun 29, 2012
Location: Your girlfriends panties

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1563 » by TDJacksonville » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:08 am

Grinditout wrote:
TDJacksonville wrote:ive got my top 3 coaching Board ready :P

The coaching picks will be interesting, you could get a HOF coach but if he doesn't fit your roster then it doesn't mean anything.

oh i agree. actually make that board 4 but the #4 guy is probably like the worst coach who will be picked.
Trailblazers
PG:
SG:
F:
F:
C:
Wzajan89 @ gmail . com
MagicFan32
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 790
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
     

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1564 » by MagicFan32 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:20 am

Selected Joakim Noah with my final pick, some of you will hate on it, but all i have to say is check the advanced stats, they completely validate my pick. especially his offensive and defensive rtg's

also fits my team, my bigs were lacking in a little skill, Noah is a very skilled passer and like my other bigs very good defensively, adds some efficiency and will do anything to win.
Overall I feel I have one of the best passing teams in this league
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
User avatar
LBPTarHeel27
RealGM
Posts: 11,833
And1: 1,512
Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Location: Right behind you
   

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1565 » by LBPTarHeel27 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:28 am

I love Noah but his chronic foot issues are a huge red flag, especially since his career is only a few years deep.
Image
User avatar
Grinditout
RealGM
Posts: 10,618
And1: 2,752
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1566 » by Grinditout » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:29 am

MagicFan32 wrote:Selected Joakim Noah with my final pick, some of you will hate on it, but all i have to say is check the advanced stats, they completely validate my pick. especially his offensive and defensive rtg's

also fits my team, my bigs were lacking in a little skill, Noah is a very skilled passer and like my other bigs very good defensively, adds some efficiency and will do anything to win.
Overall I feel I have one of the best passing teams in this league

:wave:

But your team is one of the better passing ones too.
User avatar
SOUL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,343
And1: 41,063
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Orl★ndo
     

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1567 » by SOUL » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:33 am

wasnt starks picked?
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
User avatar
Grinditout
RealGM
Posts: 10,618
And1: 2,752
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1568 » by Grinditout » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:34 am

SOUL wrote:wasnt starks picked?

Nope, and as a Knick fan I'm glad he got in.

Although I think Spree8 should have gotten a true SF though....
MagicFan32
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 790
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
     

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1569 » by MagicFan32 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:36 am

LBPTarHeel27 wrote:I love Noah but his chronic foot issues are a huge red flag, especially since his career is only a few years deep.

yeah but we aren't projecting how much longer his career will be, all we have is what he's done and theorhetically in a backup role, i am saving his body.
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
User avatar
Grinditout
RealGM
Posts: 10,618
And1: 2,752
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1570 » by Grinditout » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:41 am

Still can't believe one guy is still available. I almost took him two rounds ago...
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 16,506
And1: 9,177
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1571 » by spree8 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:42 am

Grinditout wrote:
SOUL wrote:wasnt starks picked?

Nope, and as a Knick fan I'm glad he got in.

Although I think Spree8 should have gotten a true SF though....



Rip has played sf plenty...he's even listed as a guard-forward. Was gunna go with the X-Man (a bigger sf), but decided he could be risky with chemistry. Other than that, there's no better fit than Starks...happy I got him.
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,516
And1: 8,806
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1572 » by Skin » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:42 am

Coaching picks are mostly meaningless. A good coach simply coaches to his players strength.

I'd be more critical of the judging on coaches if we had picked the coaches first and then built our teams around that.
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,516
And1: 8,806
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1573 » by Skin » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:45 am

Grinditout wrote:Still can't believe one guy is still available. I almost took him two rounds ago...

Imagine the reach you would've made. :)

At this point players are being passed up because teams have that position filled already.
User avatar
SOUL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,343
And1: 41,063
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Orl★ndo
     

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1574 » by SOUL » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:46 am

i swore i saw starks like a lot of rounds ago.. strange
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
User avatar
Grinditout
RealGM
Posts: 10,618
And1: 2,752
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1575 » by Grinditout » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:52 am

spree8 wrote:
Grinditout wrote:
SOUL wrote:wasnt starks picked?

Nope, and as a Knick fan I'm glad he got in.

Although I think Spree8 should have gotten a true SF though....



Rip has played sf plenty...he's even listed as a guard-forward. Was gunna go with the X-Man (a bigger sf), but decided he could be risky with chemistry. Other than that, there's no better fit than Starks...happy I got him.


I was thinking of a former Maverick/Piston from the late 80s that would have been real nice, I'll let you know once the player draft is over.
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 16,506
And1: 9,177
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1576 » by spree8 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:00 am

Grinditout wrote:
spree8 wrote:
Grinditout wrote:Nope, and as a Knick fan I'm glad he got in.

Although I think Spree8 should have gotten a true SF though....



Rip has played sf plenty...he's even listed as a guard-forward. Was gunna go with the X-Man (a bigger sf), but decided he could be risky with chemistry. Other than that, there's no better fit than Starks...happy I got him.


I was thinking of a former Maverick/Piston from the late 80s that would have been real nice, I'll let you know once the player draft is over.



Isiah's boy huh? Thought of him, but wanted someone who could spread the floor, and pass (Starks dished 5-6 apg in his prime) with good defense. I think stylistically he's a perfect fit.
User avatar
bigdogdylan5
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,525
And1: 2,320
Joined: May 13, 2011

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1577 » by bigdogdylan5 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:32 am

spree8 wrote:
Grinditout wrote:
spree8 wrote:

Rip has played sf plenty...he's even listed as a guard-forward. Was gunna go with the X-Man (a bigger sf), but decided he could be risky with chemistry. Other than that, there's no better fit than Starks...happy I got him.


I was thinking of a former Maverick/Piston from the late 80s that would have been real nice, I'll let you know once the player draft is over.



Isiah's boy huh? Thought of him, but wanted someone who could spread the floor, and pass (Starks dished 5-6 apg in his prime) with good defense. I think stylistically he's a perfect fit.

Are you talking about Dumars? I picked him ages ago
Fine print disclaimer for Fultz:
I am high on Markelle Fultz. Yes I understand he is not perfect and needs to shoot more and better and turn the ball over less. I would really like to see him play one more year… and I did and he sucks time to move on.
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 16,506
And1: 9,177
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1578 » by spree8 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:46 am

Na..Aguirre
User avatar
LBPTarHeel27
RealGM
Posts: 11,833
And1: 1,512
Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Location: Right behind you
   

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1579 » by LBPTarHeel27 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:49 am

spree8 wrote:Na..Aguirre


Not sure if you realized it but you picked out of order, ahead of the person in front of you. No one seems to have cared, so that's fine...just pay closer attention, please.
Image
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 16,506
And1: 9,177
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: BaTATAS 1.0: DISCUSSION THREAD - 3 HOUR CLOCK 

Post#1580 » by spree8 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:55 am

LBPTarHeel27 wrote:
spree8 wrote:Na..Aguirre


Not sure if you realized it but you picked out of order, ahead of the person in front of you. No one seems to have cared, so that's fine...just pay closer attention, please.


People aren't numbering their picks, and when they get skipped and pick randomly later on they don't specify...when I count 196, and then another pick afterwards I'm assuming its 197...shouldn't have to be a detective especially when the first page with the results isn't updated either. Just sayin....this also happened earlier today when 4 picks were OTC. .

Return to Orlando Magic