ImageImageImageImage

The Tobias Harris Situation

Moderators: Howard Mass, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, UCFJayBird, ChosenSavior

BadWolf
General Manager
Posts: 8,945
And1: 3,447
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#161 » by BadWolf » Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:09 am

Bensational wrote:
BullsFTW wrote:
Bensational wrote:Mirotic + McDermott for Harris + Harkless

Vuc/Dedmon
Mirotic/O'Quinn
Gordon/McDermott
Dipo/Fournier
Payton/?

this is obviously getting a bit greedy and Chicago wouldn't say yes. i'd be happy with straight up Mirotic/Harris swap, or a McDermott/Harkless swap, too.

I'd do McDermott + SAC 1st for Harris


sure. right after we do Harkless for Mirotic.

a Harris for Mirotic swap is fair for both sides.


that's actually not a bad offer.
mcd has potential, but struggled , got injured and fell out of rotation
and probably a late lottery pick in 2016
axl_c_cool
Analyst
Posts: 3,611
And1: 871
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
     

 

Post#162 » by axl_c_cool » Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:45 am

If they add multiple picks in like the Sacramento and their own I'd do the deal

Sent from my D2303 using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 37,004
And1: 14,908
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#163 » by tiderulz » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:38 pm

VucchiManee wrote:I love Tobias, but unfortunately I don't see him becoming the "Star" you need to succeed in this league. Vucevic/Payton/Gordon/Oladipo/KOQ should be our young core, while adding an already proven commodity. A few players I wouldn't mind going after are Goran Dragic, LMA and Kawhi. The last two would be longshots but they're both definitely worth taking a look at. The most realistic move imo would be to go after Dragic and possibly S&T Harris for Dragic. Draft a SF/PF depending what we develop Aaron Gordon as.


do you realize that LMA turns 30 this summer, and expires this year, so he will want another 4 year contract a high price. That really shouldnt be what we target for this current, young team.
BullsFTW
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 1,893
Joined: Apr 08, 2012
       

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#164 » by BullsFTW » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:41 pm

Bensational wrote:
BullsFTW wrote:
Bensational wrote:Mirotic + McDermott for Harris + Harkless

Vuc/Dedmon
Mirotic/O'Quinn
Gordon/McDermott
Dipo/Fournier
Payton/?

this is obviously getting a bit greedy and Chicago wouldn't say yes. i'd be happy with straight up Mirotic/Harris swap, or a McDermott/Harkless swap, too.

I'd do McDermott + SAC 1st for Harris


sure. right after we do Harkless for Mirotic.

a Harris for Mirotic swap is fair for both sides.

Not for Mirotic. That's asking a lot for a guy who's expiring at the end of the season.

Not even sure if he's in Orlando's future plan. Surprised he's coming off the bench all of a sudden.
BullsFTW
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 1,893
Joined: Apr 08, 2012
       

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#165 » by BullsFTW » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:48 pm

BadWolf wrote:
Bensational wrote:
BullsFTW wrote:I'd do McDermott + SAC 1st for Harris


sure. right after we do Harkless for Mirotic.

a Harris for Mirotic swap is fair for both sides.


that's actually not a bad offer.
mcd has potential, but struggled , got injured and fell out of rotation
and probably a late lottery pick in 2016

I like McDermott. I think he would've been averaging at least 10 PPG if he's given playing time. But it's hard for him to crack the rotation this season. I think he'll be great for your young core. The SAC Pick will likely not be available this draft, but hopefully next year.

I really like Harris game, I think he's a great wing partner for Butler. He's a big SF who scores in different ways, and he'll be a great fit for our core of Rose/Noah/Butler/Mirotic.
User avatar
KingRobb02
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,464
And1: 917
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
         

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#166 » by KingRobb02 » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:44 pm

BullsFTW wrote:
BadWolf wrote:
Bensational wrote:
sure. right after we do Harkless for Mirotic.

a Harris for Mirotic swap is fair for both sides.


that's actually not a bad offer.
mcd has potential, but struggled , got injured and fell out of rotation
and probably a late lottery pick in 2016

I like McDermott. I think he would've been averaging at least 10 PPG if he's given playing time. But it's hard for him to crack the rotation this season. I think he'll be great for your young core. The SAC Pick will likely not be available this draft, but hopefully next year.

I really like Harris game, I think he's a great wing partner for Butler. He's a big SF who scores in different ways, and he'll be a great fit for our core of Rose/Noah/Butler/Mirotic.

McDermott? Really? What NBA skill has he displayed so far?
BullsFTW
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 1,893
Joined: Apr 08, 2012
       

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#167 » by BullsFTW » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:49 pm

KingRobb02 wrote:
BullsFTW wrote:
BadWolf wrote:
that's actually not a bad offer.
mcd has potential, but struggled , got injured and fell out of rotation
and probably a late lottery pick in 2016

I like McDermott. I think he would've been averaging at least 10 PPG if he's given playing time. But it's hard for him to crack the rotation this season. I think he'll be great for your young core. The SAC Pick will likely not be available this draft, but hopefully next year.

I really like Harris game, I think he's a great wing partner for Butler. He's a big SF who scores in different ways, and he'll be a great fit for our core of Rose/Noah/Butler/Mirotic.

McDermott? Really? What NBA skill has he displayed so far?

Shooting
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,935
And1: 12,805
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#168 » by BadMofoPimp » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:50 pm

No to McD for Harris. I would consider Mirotic for Harris because that serves a need at PF while I think he would gel well with our European players in team play.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
KingRobb02
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,464
And1: 917
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
         

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#169 » by KingRobb02 » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:04 pm

BullsFTW wrote:
KingRobb02 wrote:
BullsFTW wrote:I like McDermott. I think he would've been averaging at least 10 PPG if he's given playing time. But it's hard for him to crack the rotation this season. I think he'll be great for your young core. The SAC Pick will likely not be available this draft, but hopefully next year.

I really like Harris game, I think he's a great wing partner for Butler. He's a big SF who scores in different ways, and he'll be a great fit for our core of Rose/Noah/Butler/Mirotic.

McDermott? Really? What NBA skill has he displayed so far?

Shooting

He's shooting 42% overall and 23% from 3. I'm not sure that shooting is the skill I would list first on my resume. Those are Adam Morrison levels of efficiency.
JBSouthpaw
Analyst
Posts: 3,385
And1: 1,359
Joined: Mar 01, 2011

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#170 » by JBSouthpaw » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:10 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:No to McD for Harris. I would consider Mirotic for Harris because that serves a need at PF while I think he would gel well with our European players in team play.


For an expiring, McD isn't a bad get. I'd like one of their 1sts too though.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,935
And1: 12,805
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#171 » by BadMofoPimp » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:18 pm

JBSouthpaw wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:No to McD for Harris. I would consider Mirotic for Harris because that serves a need at PF while I think he would gel well with our European players in team play.


For an expiring, McD isn't a bad get. I'd like one of their 1sts too though.


No need for another defensless SF. I see no reason trading Harris for another SF period.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
BullsFTW
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 1,893
Joined: Apr 08, 2012
       

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#172 » by BullsFTW » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:24 pm

KingRobb02 wrote:
BullsFTW wrote:
KingRobb02 wrote:McDermott? Really? What NBA skill has he displayed so far?

Shooting

He's shooting 42% overall and 23% from 3. I'm not sure that shooting is the skill I would list first on my resume. Those are Adam Morrison levels of efficiency.

He was hurt and not given enough playing time to get comfortable.

Adam Morrison was never the shooter McDermott is.
JBSouthpaw
Analyst
Posts: 3,385
And1: 1,359
Joined: Mar 01, 2011

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#173 » by JBSouthpaw » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:53 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:
JBSouthpaw wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:No to McD for Harris. I would consider Mirotic for Harris because that serves a need at PF while I think he would gel well with our European players in team play.


For an expiring, McD isn't a bad get. I'd like one of their 1sts too though.


No need for another defensless SF. I see no reason trading Harris for another SF period.


I'm thinking we won't have Harkless or Harris on the team next year, so we'd be a bit thin with just AG & Marble.
Also, Doug can shoot, it's a different skill than what any of our SFs would have. I think he would be great off the bench.
mojosodope
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,739
And1: 459
Joined: Apr 29, 2011
     

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#174 » by mojosodope » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:55 pm

So Harris is worth McDermott now?

Some of you are COMICAL. If Harris gets roasted for his Defense, could you imagine the field day this board would have with McDermott?
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,935
And1: 12,805
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#175 » by BadMofoPimp » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:00 pm

JBSouthpaw wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
JBSouthpaw wrote:
For an expiring, McD isn't a bad get. I'd like one of their 1sts too though.


No need for another defensless SF. I see no reason trading Harris for another SF period.


I'm thinking we won't have Harkless or Harris on the team next year, so we'd be a bit thin with just AG & Marble.
Also, Doug can shoot, it's a different skill than what any of our SFs would have. I think he would be great off the bench.


I said no need for another DEFENSELESS SF on this team. This is more of a lateral move while trading a player who can take it to the rack for a player who sits on the wings and jacks shots.

In addition, Hark may or may not be here. Not justification for a trade.

Magic desperately need Front Court help or Defense and Mirotic fills more of a need.

No Thank You.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
KingRobb02
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,464
And1: 917
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
         

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#176 » by KingRobb02 » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:01 pm

BullsFTW wrote:
KingRobb02 wrote:
BullsFTW wrote:Shooting

He's shooting 42% overall and 23% from 3. I'm not sure that shooting is the skill I would list first on my resume. Those are Adam Morrison levels of efficiency.

He was hurt and not given enough playing time to get comfortable.

Adam Morrison was never the shooter McDermott is.

Are you basing this off of college? Because that is a completely different skillset than his NBA. look at guys like Luke Babbitt and Jimmer. Trading for a guy with a single digit PER with the explanation that he was hurt just sounds silly.
JBSouthpaw
Analyst
Posts: 3,385
And1: 1,359
Joined: Mar 01, 2011

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#177 » by JBSouthpaw » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:14 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:
JBSouthpaw wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:No to McD for Harris. I would consider Mirotic for Harris because that serves a need at PF while I think he would gel well with our European players in team play.


For an expiring, McD isn't a bad get. I'd like one of their 1sts too though.


No need for another defensless SF. I see no reason trading Harris for another SF period.


I'm thinking we won't have Harkless or Harris on the team next year, so we'd be a bit thin with just AG & Marble.
Also, Doug can shoot, it's a different skill than what any of our SFs would have. I think he would be great off the bench.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,935
And1: 12,805
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#178 » by BadMofoPimp » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:17 pm

JBSouthpaw wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
JBSouthpaw wrote:
For an expiring, McD isn't a bad get. I'd like one of their 1sts too though.


No need for another defensless SF. I see no reason trading Harris for another SF period.


I'm thinking we won't have Harkless or Harris on the team next year, so we'd be a bit thin with just AG & Marble.
Also, Doug can shoot, it's a different skill than what any of our SFs would have. I think he would be great off the bench.


I will still pass. This team has bad enough defense and zero need for a SF. I seriously doubt Henny is going to trade any player because,"we will probably lose a player anyways." Doesn't make sense to me. We need defense and Frontcourt. Harris is worth much more than McDougie. I wish him luck though. He overrated on this board though.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,791
And1: 9,619
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#179 » by Blue_and_Whte » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:24 pm

mojosodope wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
i think you can compare, if they are doing the same things. If the ball is stopping in Dipo's hands (which it used to when he was playing PG, i do like him better now that he can concentrate on just SG) or when he goes 6-20 on a night, and he hasnt shown me this extreme defense. Yet on a night when Dipo will go 6-20 and Harris goes 5-15, people will only criticize Harris. I agree that situations are different with regard to RFA and his contract situation. Like i said, im for whatever improves the team. It just seems that some players escape criticism while doing the exact things that Harris gets criticized for, and i cant understand why.

As for the game last night, i had to take my kids out, so i didnt get to watch it. But even though he has said the right things in the paper, you can tell he doesnt like coming off the bench and having his minutes reduced. Again, similar situation, Harris comes back from injury and JV puts him off the bench, Dipo comes back from injury and is immediately starting at SG, which we can all agree seems to have bother Fournier who was playing well in the starting lineup and is now a shell of his previous play.

I seem to remember a time when Tobes would always get the benefit of the doubt, all the time, and If you said one negative thing about him you'd get flamed. Now it seems as though people are finally seeing that he's a 17/8 player (like I said he would be all offseason.) when they thought he would be a "beast" 20+ppg 10 rpg player without Afflalo and Jameer.

People hyped him up in their head and now reality has hit that he's close to his ceiling and people are kinda turning on him. I think his recent slump is because of Vaughn personally and even last night he only played 20 mpg which makes no sense to me considering our record when hitting the 100 point mark. If anything Tobes is a consistent scorer and rebounder which are things the team is struggling with. Its no coincidence that we've been struggling on the glass since his minutes have been capped or whatever Vaughn is doing. He's our second best scorer and rebounder and needs to play big minutes for us to win.

tiderulz wrote:
how would that make sense? Jrue is a starting PG, has been for years and is 24. I cant see him being a "good soldier" and moving to the bench willingly. plus, you want to pay the backup PG $11mil+/yr?
and Harris for Holiday makes no sense....


Not sure there was ever a time where Harris was given the benefit of the doubt. The offseason was filled with people who argued he was worth no more than the 8-9 per year we offered him.

Your selective memory on claiming he was a career 17/8 player is comical at best. For 2 years you claimed that Harkless was a better option at the 3 than him.


What's comical is you putting together a bunch of words to paint an incorrect picture of what I said. An irrational love fest for Harris has done that to people though. Allow me to set you straight...

When people sort through the BS you posted they'll see what I actually said was that, imo, he fit in better with the starters we had at the time which was Jameer and Afflalo since he didn't need the ball. He could focus on defense and hitting open shots....

Harris needs the ball to be effective, he did then and he does now, and that at the time he could boost our bench scoring because he wouldn't have to be a third option behind Jameer and Afflalo and have the ball exclusively in his hands. I also said that Harkless is a better option defensively which is also true. What people who would suckle Harris's teet at the drop of a dime if he asked them to, saw was "Oh Emm Gee you're a hater" and "You think Harkless is the better player". As is typical with people who have an irrational love for Harris you've also failed to mention, from that very same debate, that I also thought Harris was the better over all scorer, competitor, and rebounder than Harkless.

Now it appears the market is dictating a value above what we COULD have resigned him for and this board is ready to pretend that we will be better off without him, nevermind the fact that the slump he is in is almost purely manufactured by our dingbat of a coach.

Let's take a trip down memory lane to the first 5 games of the regular season when Harris was essentially in another slump and stinking it up. Half the board was ready to get rid of him then as well.


I wasn't talking about this season. The last two season you couldn't start a post with "I don't think Harris can..." without one of his defenders coming to his rescue with tears probably running down their face. "you just hate him because we didn't draft him." as if that matters.

Also, nobody said we'd be better without him. Just like your love for Harris distorts your ability to comprehend what I was saying in the Harkless debate, it has also led you to unfairly accuse people of saying things they didn't say. What people don't want is to overpay for a two dimensional tweener who struggles defending the only two positions he can play. Hopefully Hennigan will dictate what he gets and if Tobes doesn't like it then he can hit bricks. My hope would be that Hennigan does what's best for the team, and personally I think that's adding elite players around Harris. I now think what's happening to our team and its young players is a direct result of our coaching. Just like Hark and AN, I think Harris could benefit from a coach who knows how to use him to his fullest potential.
VucchiManee
Ballboy
Posts: 34
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 27, 2015
       

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#180 » by VucchiManee » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:25 pm

tiderulz wrote:
VucchiManee wrote:I love Tobias, but unfortunately I don't see him becoming the "Star" you need to succeed in this league. Vucevic/Payton/Gordon/Oladipo/KOQ should be our young core, while adding an already proven commodity. A few players I wouldn't mind going after are Goran Dragic, LMA and Kawhi. The last two would be longshots but they're both definitely worth taking a look at. The most realistic move imo would be to go after Dragic and possibly S&T Harris for Dragic. Draft a SF/PF depending what we develop Aaron Gordon as.


do you realize that LMA turns 30 this summer, and expires this year, so he will want another 4 year contract a high price. That really shouldnt be what we target for this current, young team.



If he wants a huge contract then we don't go after him. If you don't think he'd be worth taking a look at then idk what to tell you.

Return to Orlando Magic