ImageImageImageImage

All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0

Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior

Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 12,208
And1: 7,349
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#161 » by Rainwater » Fri Jan 10, 2025 6:09 am

DusterBuster wrote:
Rainwater wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
And at that point he was telling the truth, Dame hadn't asked for a trade when he made those comments.

Cronin made it clear he wouldn't trade Dame without a trade demand.

Think what you will on Cronin as a GM, but he's been honest to a fault. He's also not shown a lot of willingness to take big swings unless his hand is forced. He doesn't seem to want to trade players without the players input and involvement. He is deferential to a fault with the players, even being willing to take worse deals for the team to get players to where they want to go (this is a backed up fact reporting with the previous trades involving CJ and Norm Powell).

I understand how you would think that from afar, but as someone who's followed the Blazers and Cronin much closer, I can promise you don't have all the facts quite straight or are missing some key context.


I just disagree with this take, the writing was all over the wall that Dame was gone. The heat literally prepared a deal at the time knowing he was gone. The Blazers essentially pushed him out by going young. There is no way Cronin didn’t know.

I am not saying this because I like Simons but it just makes no sense for the Blazers to not trade Simons. If it doesn’t happen this year it’s happening next year before his contract is up. Given the current state of the blazers they aren’t going to resign him and they aren’t just going to let him expire. So they will likely trade. It may not be the magic but it will be somebody.


This isn’t a take… it’s what was reported and the full timeline of what happened from those who experienced it first hand…

I agree with you and if I were in charge, that would happen (trading Simons), but literally everything said and actions made from Joe Cronin back up what I explained in the other post.

And again, your timeline of events is simply incorrect. You can say "the writing was on the wall" all you want, but that isn't backed up by any truth. Dame was with Cronin pre-draft and was at all the Blazers workouts for potential picks at #3. The two were in constant contact about trade offers that were being made for the pick. He wanted to keep Dame and Dame was looking for a reason to stay up until the night of the draft when they made the pick instead of trading it for help. That was Dame's red line, Cronin didn't find a deal he liked and decided to make the pick.

That doesn't make anything he said pre-draft to Dame, to the media, or to fans / season ticket holders a lie.

Again, this isn't "my take", this is fact of the timeline of what happened and you're wrong about it. It's ok to be wrong.


This is where what you are saying makes no sense; if they were in constant contact, if they truly wanted to keep Dame, and they knew what his redline was? Yet still drafted Scoot. How does this not tell you they did not push him out? The Heat literally kept assets knowing that Dame would get traded. I feel like you are giving these reports way too much credit instead of seeing what was actually happening.

Everyone knew that Scoot was the 3rd best prospect in that draft, everyone knew that Portland would likely draft Scoot, and everyone knew drafting Scoot would likely force Dame out. Everyone knew that Portland needed to go in another direction. I find it hard to believe Cronin didn't know any of this.

If you want to believe that Simons won't be traded based off the "reports" fine, but I would be shocked if Simons is still on that team in two years.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,102
And1: 14,912
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#162 » by basketballRob » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:15 am

Simons 0 points in 29 minutes. 0-9 and 0-5 from 3.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,184
And1: 19,219
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#163 » by pepe1991 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:06 am

basketballRob wrote:Simons 0 points in 29 minutes. 0-9 and 0-5 from 3.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Damn, that declines his 3 point shooting for 2025 below 47% :rofl:

Simons would be huge for our offense. I know front office won't do jack s*** any time soon, Simons isn't perfect, if he is, he would be untouchable and yes his defense tends to be a**.

But for salary he makes we pay guys like Carter, KCP, Isaac, Wagner , Harris also serious money, and not a single on of them is two way player. We pay for this year Isaac $25M to play defense twice a week for 13 min .
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
orlando_joe
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,896
And1: 1,911
Joined: Dec 27, 2015
     

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#164 » by orlando_joe » Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:05 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Simons 0 points in 29 minutes. 0-9 and 0-5 from 3.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Damn, that declines his 3 point shooting for 2025 below 47% :rofl:

Simons would be huge for our offense. I know front office won't do jack s*** any time soon, Simons isn't perfect, if he is, he would be untouchable and yes his defense tends to be a**.

But for salary he makes we pay guys like Carter, KCP, Isaac, Wagner , Harris also serious money, and not a single on of them is two way player. We pay for this year Isaac $25M to play defense twice a week for 13 min .

kcp shooting 36% over last 24 games as most durable maybe best defender on the team..wagner shot same % as simons this yr.on 1 yr deals for 5 yrs that avg what 6 mill a yr??..simons has played more then 65 games only 1 time!! isaac after this season that does not matter he is on a 4 yr 15 mill a yr non guaranteed contract !! and now 7 mill for vet on 1 yr deal is serious money? ok
and all those players make over there time in orlando less per yr not close ..not sure how perfect
RichCollab
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,317
And1: 1,401
Joined: Oct 23, 2019
         

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#165 » by RichCollab » Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:16 pm

basketballRob wrote:Simons 0 points in 29 minutes. 0-9 and 0-5 from 3.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


This is his Jimmy Bulter way of saying he wants to play for the Magic.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,184
And1: 19,219
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#166 » by pepe1991 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:58 pm

orlando_joe wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Simons 0 points in 29 minutes. 0-9 and 0-5 from 3.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Damn, that declines his 3 point shooting for 2025 below 47% :rofl:

Simons would be huge for our offense. I know front office won't do jack s*** any time soon, Simons isn't perfect, if he is, he would be untouchable and yes his defense tends to be a**.

But for salary he makes we pay guys like Carter, KCP, Isaac, Wagner , Harris also serious money, and not a single on of them is two way player. We pay for this year Isaac $25M to play defense twice a week for 13 min .

kcp shooting 36% over last 24 games as most durable maybe best defender on the team..wagner shot same % as simons this yr.on 1 yr deals for 5 yrs that avg what 6 mill a yr??..simons has played more then 65 games only 1 time!! isaac after this season that does not matter he is on a 4 yr 15 mill a yr non guaranteed contract !! and now 7 mill for vet on 1 yr deal is serious money? ok
and all those players make over there time in orlando less per yr not close ..not sure how perfect


KCP averages 9 ppg as starter. In what world he isn't definition of one way role player?
Mortiz plays for $11M a year, not $6. He is also really bad defender for big ( one dimensional ).
You really gonna use games played and in same sentence mention Isaac ( and Carter ? ) . Isaac and Carter, drafted in 2017, played 241 ( Isaac) and 344 ( Carter) .
Simons, despite fact he hardly ever played as a rookie (on contender that went to CF ), despite fact he was drafted YEAR LATER already played 356 games. So more than both. :lol:

Gary Harris makes a lot for a guy who pretty much never plays . Guy already missed over 50% of games this year. 4 ppg /16 mpg is yet another- one dimensional player.

Look i'm not making case for Simons, but it's hard to make objective argument against him, given that team is setting some decades old records in terms of shooting. And not in a good way. And offese right now is third worst in nba.
On top of that, Magic line up some of worst guard lineups nba has to offer. Queen and Black? That's a solid PG-SG duo.. For China.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,437
And1: 8,454
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#167 » by Skybox » Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:05 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Simons 0 points in 29 minutes. 0-9 and 0-5 from 3.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Damn, that declines his 3 point shooting for 2025 below 47% :rofl:

Simons would be huge for our offense. I know front office won't do jack s*** any time soon, Simons isn't perfect, if he is, he would be untouchable and yes his defense tends to be a**.

But for salary he makes we pay guys like Carter, KCP, Isaac, Wagner , Harris also serious money, and not a single on of them is two way player. We pay for this year Isaac $25M to play defense twice a week for 13 min .


Of course…the hyper-critical analysis of trade targets versus the “not skipping steps”, “organic development”, homer excuses we make for our own guys is laughable. We’re talking about maybe one late frp and some non-core carcasses for one of the best proven scorers in the league…who is also an athletic freak, still very young, and yes- not perfect :lol:

Then, when the discussion goes further, “he’s way overpaid” and, most ironically, “he’s going to want $40m extension” (but he sucks)

Meanwhile, Fultz is good at deferring, Jett is a developing playmaker, AB smells like SGA, Cole is BACK, baby and Suggs is a PG

I don’t hate my favorite team…I’m just being objective
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,184
And1: 19,219
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#168 » by pepe1991 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:19 pm

Skybox wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Simons 0 points in 29 minutes. 0-9 and 0-5 from 3.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Damn, that declines his 3 point shooting for 2025 below 47% :rofl:

Simons would be huge for our offense. I know front office won't do jack s*** any time soon, Simons isn't perfect, if he is, he would be untouchable and yes his defense tends to be a**.

But for salary he makes we pay guys like Carter, KCP, Isaac, Wagner , Harris also serious money, and not a single on of them is two way player. We pay for this year Isaac $25M to play defense twice a week for 13 min .


Of course…the hyper-critical analysis of trade targets versus the “not skipping steps”, “organic development”, homer excuses we make for our own guys is laughable. We’re talking about maybe one late frp and some non-core carcasses for one of the best proven scorers in the league…who is also an athletic freak, still very young, and yes- not perfect :lol:

Then, when the discussion goes further, “he’s way overpaid” and, most ironically, “he’s going to want $40m extension” (but he sucks)

Meanwhile, Fultz is good at deferring, Jett is a developing playmaker, AB smells like SGA, Cole is BACK, baby and Suggs is a PG

I don’t hate my favorite team…I’m just being objective


I would argue that we FO just does not value scoring passing guards. But in same time they drafted Jett Howard who was allegedly great passer and shooter and should be SG. Yet he can't shoot, most of the time can't score, can't defend to save his life and fact he is 6'6 is just burden because he rebounds like he is 4'4.
So it's not like they don't value it, they just suck at finding such players.

And Fultz was also "scoring guard". Nevermind fact his scoring never passed 12 ppg
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
three3d
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,936
And1: 597
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#169 » by three3d » Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:31 pm

Skybox wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Simons 0 points in 29 minutes. 0-9 and 0-5 from 3.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Damn, that declines his 3 point shooting for 2025 below 47% :rofl:

Simons would be huge for our offense. I know front office won't do jack s*** any time soon, Simons isn't perfect, if he is, he would be untouchable and yes his defense tends to be a**.

But for salary he makes we pay guys like Carter, KCP, Isaac, Wagner , Harris also serious money, and not a single on of them is two way player. We pay for this year Isaac $25M to play defense twice a week for 13 min .


Of course…the hyper-critical analysis of trade targets versus the “not skipping steps”, “organic development”, homer excuses we make for our own guys is laughable. We’re talking about maybe one late frp and some non-core carcasses for one of the best proven scorers in the league…who is also an athletic freak, still very young, and yes- not perfect :lol:

Then, when the discussion goes further, “he’s way overpaid” and, most ironically, “he’s going to want $40m extension” (but he sucks)

Meanwhile, Fultz is good at deferring, Jett is a developing playmaker, AB smells like SGA, Cole is BACK, baby and Suggs is a PG

I don’t hate my favorite team…I’m just being objective



Look closely at the starting lineup for Simons last two games. You’ll notice they started Scoot, Simons, and Sharp all together so no surprise his offense looked like crap, there starting three guards under 6’5” .

Think this shows Portland is trying to figure out what to do and experimenting with the roster and it’s just not going to work. Someone is going to be the odd man out and id gladly take Simons off their hands.
orlando_joe
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,896
And1: 1,911
Joined: Dec 27, 2015
     

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#170 » by orlando_joe » Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:38 pm

Look i'm not making case for Simons, but it's hard to make objective argument against him, given that team is setting some decades old records in terms of shooting. And not in a good way. And offese right now is third worst in nba.
On top of that, Magic line up some of worst guard lineups nba has to offer. Queen and Black? That's a solid PG-SG duo.. For China.[/quote]


imagine how many games simons would miss with real injury like isaac had in playoffs a month before start of a season...
never said wagner made 6 this yr? read again avg 6 a yr over 5 yrs all on 1 yr deals..signing 1 yr deal is a very big deal for 5 straight yrs on same team has it ever happened??
kcp scoring and shooting eff same as simons one is 1.193 and .52 kcp and 1.177 and .51 for simons
one has ball in hands and jacks more shots with no energy on defense at all
what team is top offense missing top 4 scorers for as many games as magic or win as many games?

lol
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,437
And1: 8,454
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#171 » by Skybox » Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:58 pm

orlando_joe wrote:Look i'm not making case for Simons, but it's hard to make objective argument against him, given that team is setting some decades old records in terms of shooting. And not in a good way. And offese right now is third worst in nba.
On top of that, Magic line up some of worst guard lineups nba has to offer. Queen and Black? That's a solid PG-SG duo.. For China.



imagine how many games simons would miss with real injury like isaac had in playoffs a month before start of a season...
never said wagner made 6 this yr? read again avg 6 a yr over 5 yrs all on 1 yr deals..signing 1 yr deal is a very big deal for 5 straight yrs on same team has it ever happened??
kcp scoring and shooting eff same as simons one is 1.193 and .52 kcp and 1.177 and .51 for simons
one has ball in hands and jacks more shots with no energy on defense at all
what team is top offense missing top 4 scorers for as many games as magic or win as many games?

lol[/quote]

Wow. OrlandoNo, have you been hacked? There are shreds of positivity among the usual :lol:

What someone was paid early in the rebuild is irrelevant to what they will be paid when their brother and his little friend's extensions hit next year. Cap was a non-issue before, now it's going to really matter.

KCP puts in a LOT of energy on offense, but it doesn't produce results...I'd take my chances on a guy who, apparently, puts up points and assists "effortlessly" getting on board with Mose and the Fam's defensive identity...at least to the extent that Moe and Cole and Caleb, etc have. Simons' is among the most athletic guys in the league and has a very positive wingspan. For every guy that is impotent offensively, you need to somewhat balance it...Simons is as impactful on offense as KCP is on the other end. We'd be fortunate to have both types to deploy as needed (and maybe influence one another positively too). I would think it's hard to be around Suggs and KCP and not get hyped about locking guys down.

Although, I'll admit that I don't know Anfernee's heartbeat, but you don't get this far without some fire...Sexton, on the other hand, wears it on his sleeve, so might be a safer bet if the price was similar.
Idiosyncratic
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 737
Joined: Dec 07, 2024
 

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#172 » by Idiosyncratic » Fri Jan 17, 2025 2:34 pm

The argument against Simons is how much should we really pay for a score only player with a career 56.4 TS% (average for a 2 guard is 57%) making 27 million next year? It is a negative value contract. These things matter.

I've already said I am for trying him for 2 years, I like the volume 3s, but it's not as easy as just saying "go get him". Cost always needs to be considered.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,793
And1: 14,134
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#173 » by JRoy » Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:11 pm

Rainwater wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
Rainwater wrote:
I just disagree with this take, the writing was all over the wall that Dame was gone. The heat literally prepared a deal at the time knowing he was gone. The Blazers essentially pushed him out by going young. There is no way Cronin didn’t know.

I am not saying this because I like Simons but it just makes no sense for the Blazers to not trade Simons. If it doesn’t happen this year it’s happening next year before his contract is up. Given the current state of the blazers they aren’t going to resign him and they aren’t just going to let him expire. So they will likely trade. It may not be the magic but it will be somebody.


This isn’t a take… it’s what was reported and the full timeline of what happened from those who experienced it first hand…

I agree with you and if I were in charge, that would happen (trading Simons), but literally everything said and actions made from Joe Cronin back up what I explained in the other post.

And again, your timeline of events is simply incorrect. You can say "the writing was on the wall" all you want, but that isn't backed up by any truth. Dame was with Cronin pre-draft and was at all the Blazers workouts for potential picks at #3. The two were in constant contact about trade offers that were being made for the pick. He wanted to keep Dame and Dame was looking for a reason to stay up until the night of the draft when they made the pick instead of trading it for help. That was Dame's red line, Cronin didn't find a deal he liked and decided to make the pick.

That doesn't make anything he said pre-draft to Dame, to the media, or to fans / season ticket holders a lie.

Again, this isn't "my take", this is fact of the timeline of what happened and you're wrong about it. It's ok to be wrong.


This is where what you are saying makes no sense; if they were in constant contact, if they truly wanted to keep Dame, and they knew what his redline was? Yet still drafted Scoot. How does this not tell you they did not push him out? The Heat literally kept assets knowing that Dame would get traded. I feel like you are giving these reports way too much credit instead of seeing what was actually happening.

Everyone knew that Scoot was the 3rd best prospect in that draft, everyone knew that Portland would likely draft Scoot, and everyone knew drafting Scoot would likely force Dame out. Everyone knew that Portland needed to go in another direction. I find it hard to believe Cronin didn't know any of this.

If you want to believe that Simons won't be traded based off the "reports" fine, but I would be shocked if Simons is still on that team in two years.


That’s not how it looked from POR.

There was hope through draft day that the pick would be moved for talent to help Lillard win. The word was that the offers were underwhelming so they made the pick.

Also there were questions as to whether Scoot or Miller would go #2.

I didn’t want either; I wanted AB if POR kept the pick.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,437
And1: 8,454
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#174 » by Skybox » Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:42 pm

JRoy wrote:
Rainwater wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
This isn’t a take… it’s what was reported and the full timeline of what happened from those who experienced it first hand…

I agree with you and if I were in charge, that would happen (trading Simons), but literally everything said and actions made from Joe Cronin back up what I explained in the other post.

And again, your timeline of events is simply incorrect. You can say "the writing was on the wall" all you want, but that isn't backed up by any truth. Dame was with Cronin pre-draft and was at all the Blazers workouts for potential picks at #3. The two were in constant contact about trade offers that were being made for the pick. He wanted to keep Dame and Dame was looking for a reason to stay up until the night of the draft when they made the pick instead of trading it for help. That was Dame's red line, Cronin didn't find a deal he liked and decided to make the pick.

That doesn't make anything he said pre-draft to Dame, to the media, or to fans / season ticket holders a lie.

Again, this isn't "my take", this is fact of the timeline of what happened and you're wrong about it. It's ok to be wrong.


This is where what you are saying makes no sense; if they were in constant contact, if they truly wanted to keep Dame, and they knew what his redline was? Yet still drafted Scoot. How does this not tell you they did not push him out? The Heat literally kept assets knowing that Dame would get traded. I feel like you are giving these reports way too much credit instead of seeing what was actually happening.

Everyone knew that Scoot was the 3rd best prospect in that draft, everyone knew that Portland would likely draft Scoot, and everyone knew drafting Scoot would likely force Dame out. Everyone knew that Portland needed to go in another direction. I find it hard to believe Cronin didn't know any of this.

If you want to believe that Simons won't be traded based off the "reports" fine, but I would be shocked if Simons is still on that team in two years.


That’s not how it looked from POR.

There was hope through draft day that the pick would be moved for talent to help Lillard win. The word was that the offers were underwhelming so they made the pick.

Also there were questions as to whether Scoot or Miller would go #2.

I didn’t want either; I wanted AB if POR kept the pick.


given the data, I'd say it would have been malpractice to pick anybody outside of Scoot, Wemby, or Marshall in the Top 3 of that draft. They could have traded it, but I still think Scoot will be the right pick at 3...even if not for POR. Send him over. :D
User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,671
And1: 9,553
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#175 » by eyriq » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:02 pm

Skybox wrote:given the data, I'd say it would have been malpractice to pick anybody outside of Scoot, Wemby, or Marshall in the Top 3 of that draft. They could have traded it, but I still think Scoot will be the right pick at 3...even if not for POR. Send him over. :D


"Given the data" the top 3 point guards from that draft are 1. Keyonte, 2. AB, 3. Scoot
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,437
And1: 8,454
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#176 » by Skybox » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:06 pm

eyriq wrote:
Skybox wrote:given the data, I'd say it would have been malpractice to pick anybody outside of Scoot, Wemby, or Marshall in the Top 3 of that draft. They could have traded it, but I still think Scoot will be the right pick at 3...even if not for POR. Send him over. :D


"Given the data" the top 3 point guards from that draft are 1. Keyonte, 2. AB, 3. Scoot


I meant the data at the time, Scoot was the clear pick.

But I disagree with your rankings anyway :lol:
three3d
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,936
And1: 597
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#177 » by three3d » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:57 pm

I’ll say again Portlands last TWO games they have shown their hand. The lineup of Scoot, Sharpe, and Simons doesn’t work. People talk about us not paying a bench player ( Simons could start for us ) $24M next two season do you think Portland as non contenders would want to pay him that. Hell no they don’t, nor can they justify not playing Scoot and Sharpe together. They have to make a decision and we have a VERY CLEAR need for Simons.

The more they play all three of those guys together the more clear it is that it’s not going to work. Again look at Simons stats the last two games of that lineup. Hopefully it drives the price down more on Anfernee as everyone sees the writing on the wall.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,437
And1: 8,454
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#178 » by Skybox » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:03 pm

three3d wrote:I’ll say again Portlands last TWO games they have shown their hand. The lineup of Scoot, Sharpe, and Simons doesn’t work. People talk about us not paying a bench player ( Simons could start for us ) $24M next two season do you think Portland as non contenders would want to pay him that. Hell no they don’t, nor can they justify not playing Scoot and Sharpe together. They have to make a decision and we have a VERY CLEAR need for Simons.

The more they play all three of those guys together the more clear it is that it’s not going to work. Again look at Simons stats the last two games of that lineup. Hopefully it drives the price down more on Anfernee as everyone sees the writing on the wall.



Don't say the "starts" thing...everybody gets their undies in a twist :roll:

Just get him in here and see how it looks...I secretly LOVE a second unit of Simons/AB beating the crap out of the starters in practice.
three3d
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,936
And1: 597
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#179 » by three3d » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:06 pm

Also it needs to be realized Simons doesn’t just have normal three point range, no he can stretch it out to 30 feet ( 3 point line is 23 feet ) that DEEP. Paolo is great at finding the open man on the line already, so what’s gonna happen when he’s double and triple teamed? Paolo will find Simons WIDE open. Now we can talk about an under valued aspect of Simons game, he can also put the ball on the floor and drive or make plays off the dribble. Get the defense out of position now you catch Franz or Goga rolling to the rim.

The offense has to have two three point shooters out there with Paolo and Franz. One of those guys has to be able to do things off the dribble. We will say KCP is the other shooter, but he’s not attacking off the dribble. Now you have KCP spotted up, Paolo, Franz, or Goga rolling to the rim and the defense trying to reposition and catch up. Somebody’s getting an easy bucket.
three3d
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,936
And1: 597
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: All in!! Anfernee Simons 2.0 

Post#180 » by three3d » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:20 pm

Skybox wrote:
three3d wrote:I’ll say again Portlands last TWO games they have shown their hand. The lineup of Scoot, Sharpe, and Simons doesn’t work. People talk about us not paying a bench player ( Simons could start for us ) $24M next two season do you think Portland as non contenders would want to pay him that. Hell no they don’t, nor can they justify not playing Scoot and Sharpe together. They have to make a decision and we have a VERY CLEAR need for Simons.

The more they play all three of those guys together the more clear it is that it’s not going to work. Again look at Simons stats the last two games of that lineup. Hopefully it drives the price down more on Anfernee as everyone sees the writing on the wall.



Don't say the "starts" thing...everybody gets their undies in a twist :roll:

Just get him in here and see how it looks...I secretly LOVE a second unit of Simons/AB beating the crap out of the starters in practice.



Only in Orlando lol, imagine any other team being top 2 in defense and bottom 3 in offense arguing against a player that’s really good offensively because he’s questionable on defense. Like hello the answer to your problem is staring you in your face, oh and by the way he’s home grown right from your back yard and named after your greatest point guard in franchise history. :banghead:

Return to Orlando Magic