Max Power wrote:Has any one of us ever stopped and really contemplated the trade ideas that we put up here? I’m guilty of this too so I’m not ripping anyone for their ideas. We’re always putting up trade ideas for guys on teams similar to ours. Mid range teams at best. I’ll use Buddy Hield as the example since he’s the name of the moment. Has Hield lead the Kings anywhere? They’re a 30 win team like the Magic. I had an epiphany, so how would trades for guys like him, John Collins or an Andre Drummond change the fortunes of our franchise when they have the same situation with their current teams. Just food for thought...our fortunes are better with Clifford and Fultz has been a successful move and we’ve got life in Orlando now, but this team needs some lead dogs who’s won some games.
I mean, sure, it would be great if we could trade Vooch and Evan for Kawhi and Steph but that's probably not going to happen. The idea of trading Vooch for Hield would be to change the chemistry and makeup of the team putting more responsibility in other places -- would it work - I have no idea. Could make us worse or maybe other players, coupled with the better shooting from Hield, would vault us forward. I'm assuming your point is that there is a point to be made for developing within our system and while I agree with that -- I don't see Vooch as a cornerstone. Right now that's Fultz and Isaac in my mind and that's about it and you want to build a team to be successful around them. To me a guy like Hield is a better long term fit with those guys than Vooch. If you disagree, fine, but I think its absurd to dismiss players because they are on low performing teams. The Pacers have a decent guard now who used to be on a low performing team -- I think he turned out to be a little better than many thought...