Xatticus wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Xatticus wrote:
He's no Vucevic. But then... who is?
No jumpshot, rim running C, with poor discipline, poor pick&roll defense, being one of worst passing centers in college history, no floor vision, no ballhandling skills is just what doctor ordered for 1# pick.
But just like every good salesman, wait! There is more!
There has to be some understanding of your own offensive strengths and Wiseman’s habits don’t suggest he knows who he truly is. In 21 EYBL games between April 2018 and July 2018, he averaged 15.2 points on 52.7 percent true shooting. Such low efficiency and raw scoring output is concerning for a player wielding NBA-caliber size and length. Take a look at how his efficiency compares to some other bigs:
Shooting projection is a significant and worthwhile exercise for prospects. It’s fair to look at Wiseman’s indicators and wonder if his confidence is simply ahead of his development as a shooter. Across that same string of EYBL games, he went 56-of-101 (55.4 percent) from the free-throw line and 4-of-27 (14.8 percent) from 3-point range. Neither number suggests a forthcoming evolution.
Instad of being snarky for no reason, and bu**hurt and cought in feelings about debate on other thread, you are yet to say single objective, good reason why Wiseman, rim running center, with robotic post moves, no vision, no jumpshot should be 1# pick.
Guy's comparison is Deandre Jordan. Guy who never was top 40 player in nba. Who would never be more than backup C if he didn't have luxury to play with top 8 PG of all time for vast majority of his career in Chris Paul.
His probably most objective comparison is Andre Drummond in better shape. This is ceiling. Floor is taller Biyombo.
Main reason why Wolves, Warriors among others are getting rid of their 2020 picks is because it's clear as a day that this draft has soooo little talent. This is like 2013 and debates who is better, Otto Porter, Oladipo, Noel, Zeller or Alex Len. Nobody cares. 7 years later non of them is top 30 player.
I've already posted why I would take Wiseman at 2. I just thought it hilarious that your criticism of Wiseman was with regards to defense given the recent debate and that you are enamored with Vucevic. There is basically zero chance that he will end up an inferior defender to Vucevic.
By the way, the question was: who you would take if we traded Vucevic to acquire the number 2 pick in the draft? Feel free to throw an opinion out there.
This is not just critique of defense but prospect in general. Even if he is better defender than Vučević, it still means nothing for him as prospect, as he is rim running center without single advanced basketball skill.
Over 3 college games that he logged, he did not play against single 7 footer. Matter of fact tallest player he faced was some guy named Braelen Bridges, standing at 6'10 and 220 pounds, so he had 3 inches and 20 pounds on him.
And despite all that, he actually only dominated in one game.
Whole thing about him reminds me of overdrafting Darius Garland based on small supersize and reaching for things that are not there.
What's really difference between what is Wiseman projected to be and Jarret Allen or Mitchell Robinson? Former 22# and second round pick?
First of all, if i have top 2 pick, i'm in desparate search to move down or get basketball player instad.
If i have to choose , i'm taking Avdija.
Tbh i'm not sure i would even take Wiseman 3rd. In his apsolute best, he will never be more than 4th best player on contender. That's such a low ceiling for top pick.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon