Blue_and_Whte wrote:SOUL wrote:eyriq wrote:Having a "defined role" at this stage of the rebuild is exactly what makes him expendable.
Why do you think that? I could see it if we were still in a kicking-the-can-down-the-road stage, but FO/team seems lockstep in competing asap. Not in terms of like, Hennigan style trading young guys for vets compete, but having continuity in roles and higher expectations sort of competing, while integrating rook(s).
Cole is hands down the most under appreciated player on this team. He played really well in his role last season and people want to trade him for no damn reason.
Nobody wants to trade him for “no damn reason”…and you know that.
There are good reasons, based on respect for his growth. He’s too damn good to back up Fultz or get paid backup money. I’d rather start him than Fultz and see if he’s going to show he’s worthy of the job. He wasn’t ready last year, but he’s shown a lot of growth. Our present starter is limited, even if he’s better than Cole today.
People casually say “Cole has embraced his role”…that’s a crock of s**t. He knows he’s good and probably thinks he’s a future all-star. No way a guy with his background, at his age, is content to settle in a bench guy for a non-playoff team. Doesn’t make him selfish or a bad teammate either…he’s got the best personality on the team.
I’d rather trade him for something of value than lose him or pay him $18m/yr (which, in a vacuum, he will likely deserve)…just not here
Trades are asset management …not necessarily “giving up on a guy” or dumping him.