ImageImageImageImage

OT: Gulf Help

Moderators: Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF

User avatar
ivDT
RealGM
Posts: 18,548
And1: 1,587
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
 

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#21 » by ivDT » Fri Jun 4, 2010 6:16 pm

aleZ wrote:
PimpORL wrote:lol I think it's funny that people only care about this because their careers and local economies might be affected. The planet is already royally **** and there's no fixing this, but that's cool, right?


Damn right
but you gotta give it up for capitalism: nearly killed the economy as we know it in late '08 now it's back with its targets set on nature and wildlife.


i'm not a fan of what is often called "capitalism" in this country, but i'm pretty sure something like this would've happened regardless of how the economy was organized.
Catledge
Starter
Posts: 2,402
And1: 859
Joined: Mar 04, 2003
     

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#22 » by Catledge » Fri Jun 4, 2010 6:23 pm

ivDT wrote:i'm still not sure what it is that pimporl wants or expects from people.

no one is saying we shouldn't clean up the oil or that we shouldn't concern ourselves with the millions (my own wild unscientific estimate) of ecosystems that will be affected by this disaster. all i'm saying is that the desire to keep the gulf livable for the human species is really all the motivation we need. the desire to keep people fed, clothed and sheltered is a concern that by itself can be (and is) the driving force for a very wide range of environmental concerns.

i mean, what more do you want? new age spirituality and aesthetics?


I can't speak for pimporl, but perhaps another way of putting it is, "Why do people have to wait for a disaster to hit their backyard before they accept an appropriate measure of civic responsibility?" I mean, since the 1960s LA has been a state in which the idea of government regulations has been extremely unpopular. Now that they suddenly get hit by a disaster that could have been prevented by a more responsible approach to regulating business, people are suddenly indignant that the government is not doing enough. It would be nice if people would think of this before the levies break or the mine collapses or the banks go under or -- in this case -- the oil rig explodes.
User avatar
aleZ
General Manager
Posts: 9,196
And1: 4
Joined: Mar 28, 2005
Location: Italy, Europe
Contact:

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#23 » by aleZ » Fri Jun 4, 2010 6:26 pm

ivDT wrote:i'm not a fan of what is often called "capitalism" in this country, but i'm pretty sure something like this would've happened regardless of how the economy was organized.



I'm pretty sure keeping a closer eye on what oil companies do would greatly limit the consequences -for example there's some crap in Africa between Shell and local ppl that never hits the ariwaves. Then again: if it prints money, let it be...

Honestly I share a lot of views with PimpORL especially on politics and other stuff. He may be seen as naive/liberal/communist but when ppl give him credit it's usually (and already) too late :wink:
Catledge
Starter
Posts: 2,402
And1: 859
Joined: Mar 04, 2003
     

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#24 » by Catledge » Fri Jun 4, 2010 6:28 pm

ivDT wrote:
aleZ wrote:
PimpORL wrote:lol I think it's funny that people only care about this because their careers and local economies might be affected. The planet is already royally **** and there's no fixing this, but that's cool, right?


Damn right
but you gotta give it up for capitalism: nearly killed the economy as we know it in late '08 now it's back with its targets set on nature and wildlife.


i'm not a fan of what is often called "capitalism" in this country, but i'm pretty sure something like this would've happened regardless of how the economy was organized.


Dude, Norway requires that rigs off their coasts have an extra layer of fail-safes than our government requires. The suggestion that government could have done nothing to prevent this flies in the face of an extraordinary amount of evidence to the contrary.

I might not blame this on the concept of capitalism, but market fundamentalism -- the idea that the government should never meddle in business -- does bear a significant amount of blame.
User avatar
ivDT
RealGM
Posts: 18,548
And1: 1,587
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
 

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#25 » by ivDT » Fri Jun 4, 2010 7:27 pm

Catledge wrote:Dude, Norway requires that rigs off their coasts have an extra layer of fail-safes than our government requires.


um, ok...

my point was that even in the absence of "capitalism", accidents like this will still happen. that accidents like this have, in fact, happened when the drilling was done by state-owned firms in the absence of "capitalism" is a matter of simple historical record.

the ixtoc oil spill and the laundry list of environmental disasters caused by the soviet union should provide interesting reading if you wish to learn more.

The suggestion that government could have done nothing to prevent this flies in the face of an extraordinary amount of evidence to the contrary.


evidence after the fact?

regulators aren't going to be able to know every possible regulation to enact in order to prevent every possible worst-case scenario. unless we're talking about omniscient, omnipresent demigods as regulators, we'll still have situations where they only realize after the fact that this regulation or that regulation would've prevented this or that from happening.

furthermore, i don't see why government would be any better equipped to handle these things than a voluntary organization charged with the same goals. how likely is it that the regulators will know more or as much as about the industry they're regulating as the people whose livings are made in that very industry?

the only way to mitigate the knowledge gap would be to hire someone from the industry you wish to regulate to work as a regulator for that industry. of course, i'm sure you can guess what happens when you do something like that.

imo. we'd be better served by a legal order that exposed companies who are responsible for disasters like these to full liability for the damage they have caused. i think that would prove a lot more formidable to these irresponsible corporations than bumbling or complicit government regulators.

I might not blame this on the concept of capitalism, but market fundamentalism -- the idea that the government should never meddle in business -- does bear a significant amount of blame.


i'm well aware of what market fundamentalism is as i've been accused of it quite a bit since i abandoned social democracy some two and a half years ago. as for what "market fundamentalism" has to do with this disaster you will have to explain in finer detail.

seems to me that government meddling in favor of oil exploration played a pretty large role in making this mess. i would have to think that not having their liabilities capped by the government at $75 millions--chump change for a company like bp and a pittance in comparison to the actually damage they will have caused--would make companies like bp a lot less willing to play fast and lose with other people's livelihoods.
mike_miller
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,845
And1: 34
Joined: Mar 30, 2009

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#26 » by mike_miller » Fri Jun 4, 2010 9:00 pm

^ i think you are missing the point that the "pure capitalist model" means no regulation by the gov whatsoever...

accidents will always happen, the severity and frequency of those accidents is what matters
User avatar
ivDT
RealGM
Posts: 18,548
And1: 1,587
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
 

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#27 » by ivDT » Fri Jun 4, 2010 9:24 pm

mike_miller wrote:^ i think you are missing the point that the "pure capitalist model" means no regulation by the gov whatsoever...

accidents will always happen, the severity and frequency of those accidents is what matters


i'm actually fine with "no regulation by the gov whatsoever" so long as the legal environment is such that people are held fully accountable for the messes they make.

that's really the key ingredient, imo. without that, no form of regulation--be it voluntary self-regulation or regulation by the government--is going to work. accidents will be fairly frequent and fairly severe when people can claim that the damage they caused was within EPA regulated limits or can simply make a huge mess and pay a paltry sum towards those they've harmed thanks to liability caps.
magicfan1989
Banned User
Posts: 5,508
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 07, 2009

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#28 » by magicfan1989 » Fri Jun 4, 2010 9:28 pm

lol @ at the first two posters having Pat Garrit avy's. :rofl:

Loved the George Carlin video too. :rofl:
magicfan1989
Banned User
Posts: 5,508
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 07, 2009

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#29 » by magicfan1989 » Fri Jun 4, 2010 9:30 pm

I knew this would turn into a political thread. . . . . . . . .

I love political debates, but I'm not gunna jump in on this one. Had a long day at work and am too exhausted to deal with Liberal morons (That line will draw some fire, I guaruntee it). :)
User avatar
ivDT
RealGM
Posts: 18,548
And1: 1,587
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
 

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#30 » by ivDT » Fri Jun 4, 2010 9:41 pm

magicfan1989 wrote:I knew this would turn into a political thread. . . . . . . . .

I love political debates, but I'm not gunna jump in on this one. Had a long day at work and am too exhausted to deal with Liberal morons (That line will draw some fire, I guaruntee it). :)


of course. why not just keep it civil?
qbanb
Senior
Posts: 616
And1: 3
Joined: May 24, 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
   

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#31 » by qbanb » Fri Jun 4, 2010 10:29 pm

It just comes down the average person is going to focus on their situation and livelihoods. You really can't fault a person for that. Its a terrible situation no matter what angle you look at it.

But the real problem is that people are frustrated and have just aimed it at different things. Had it been resolved quickly there wouldn't be nearly as much finger pointing and name calling.

This oil spill affects everyone directly or indirectly, especially for the state of Florida. If people cancel their vacations that is money that is not going into Florida's economy. The same for the rest of the gulf coast.
Bucksfans1and2
Banned User
Posts: 16,041
And1: 189
Joined: Jun 28, 2008

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#32 » by Bucksfans1and2 » Fri Jun 4, 2010 10:45 pm

PimpORL wrote:lol I think it's funny that people only care about this because their careers and local economies might be affected. The planet is already royally **** and there's no fixing this, but that's cool, right?


The only reason this happened in the first place is because people cared about the enviroment and wanted the drilling away from the vulnrerable wildlife in shallow waters. If you let people drill where they could actually fix a mistake when it happened you wouldn't have oil on your front lawn.
Bucksfans1and2
Banned User
Posts: 16,041
And1: 189
Joined: Jun 28, 2008

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#33 » by Bucksfans1and2 » Fri Jun 4, 2010 10:47 pm

aleZ wrote:
ivDT wrote:i'm not a fan of what is often called "capitalism" in this country, but i'm pretty sure something like this would've happened regardless of how the economy was organized.



I'm pretty sure keeping a closer eye on what oil companies do would greatly limit the consequences -for example there's some crap in Africa between Shell and local ppl that never hits the ariwaves. Then again: if it prints money, let it be...

Honestly I share a lot of views with PimpORL especially on politics and other stuff. He may be seen as naive/liberal/communist but when ppl give him credit it's usually (and already) too late :wink:


The reason you have an oil spill in the first place is you try and protect the shallow water creatures. But when the oil is far out and it springs a leak it's difficult to repair. The spill doesn't happen in the first place if you're drilling in shallower waters, and even if a spill does occur it's much easier to fix.
User avatar
happypedro12
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,328
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
Location: Central FL

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#34 » by happypedro12 » Fri Jun 4, 2010 11:49 pm

well apparently I heard they finally got a cap on it, hopefully it sticks. It just sucks that no matter how you slice it the world is still extremely dependent on fossil fuels so we have to keep drilling. As I type this the ad next to me shows little baby polar bears floating on ice blocks :lol: .

God Captain Planet is rolling in his grave right now :wink:
Whether you think you CAN or you think you CAN'T, you're right.
Bucksfans1and2
Banned User
Posts: 16,041
And1: 189
Joined: Jun 28, 2008

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#35 » by Bucksfans1and2 » Sat Jun 5, 2010 12:13 am

happypedro12 wrote:well apparently I heard they finally got a cap on it, hopefully it sticks. It just sucks that no matter how you slice it the world is still extremely dependent on fossil fuels so we have to keep drilling. As I type this the ad next to me shows little baby polar bears floating on ice blocks :lol: .

God Captain Planet is rolling in his grave right now :wink:


that was such a wierd show. Was there any reason why he was allowed to go in and break stuff and punch people? No one was commiting any crimes.
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,136
And1: 8,928
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#36 » by drsd » Sat Jun 5, 2010 4:58 am

Image

A computer model run at the National Center for Atmospheric Research shows how oil from the Deepwater Horizon blowout might spread over a period of four to five months.
User avatar
aleZ
General Manager
Posts: 9,196
And1: 4
Joined: Mar 28, 2005
Location: Italy, Europe
Contact:

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#37 » by aleZ » Sat Jun 5, 2010 6:56 am

ivDT wrote:i'm actually fine with "no regulation by the gov whatsoever" so long as the legal environment is such that people are held fully accountable for the messes they make.


I'd rather prevent a disaster from happening but that's just me :roll:
You know, probably neither system would be the perfect solution: regulators may be payed to turn a blind eye and law enforcement may just be late, incompetent or too slow to act.
Simplicity0
Head Coach
Posts: 6,531
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 15, 2006

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#38 » by Simplicity0 » Sat Jun 5, 2010 12:44 pm

Bucksfans1and2 wrote:
PimpORL wrote:lol I think it's funny that people only care about this because their careers and local economies might be affected. The planet is already royally **** and there's no fixing this, but that's cool, right?


The only reason this happened in the first place is because people cared about the enviroment and wanted the drilling away from the vulnrerable wildlife in shallow waters. If you let people drill where they could actually fix a mistake when it happened you wouldn't have oil on your front lawn.

lol People who care about the environment want offshore drilling to end, period. So, I'm not exactly sure what you mean. I've never heard about environmentalists saying it's ok to drill in deeper waters.
Image
Simplicity0
Head Coach
Posts: 6,531
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 15, 2006

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#39 » by Simplicity0 » Sat Jun 5, 2010 12:45 pm

Catledge wrote:
ivDT wrote:i'm still not sure what it is that pimporl wants or expects from people.

no one is saying we shouldn't clean up the oil or that we shouldn't concern ourselves with the millions (my own wild unscientific estimate) of ecosystems that will be affected by this disaster. all i'm saying is that the desire to keep the gulf livable for the human species is really all the motivation we need. the desire to keep people fed, clothed and sheltered is a concern that by itself can be (and is) the driving force for a very wide range of environmental concerns.

i mean, what more do you want? new age spirituality and aesthetics?


I can't speak for pimporl, but perhaps another way of putting it is, "Why do people have to wait for a disaster to hit their backyard before they accept an appropriate measure of civic responsibility?" I mean, since the 1960s LA has been a state in which the idea of government regulations has been extremely unpopular. Now that they suddenly get hit by a disaster that could have been prevented by a more responsible approach to regulating business, people are suddenly indignant that the government is not doing enough. It would be nice if people would think of this before the levies break or the mine collapses or the banks go under or -- in this case -- the oil rig explodes.

Thank you
Image
Simplicity0
Head Coach
Posts: 6,531
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 15, 2006

Re: OT: Gulf Help 

Post#40 » by Simplicity0 » Sat Jun 5, 2010 12:54 pm

ivDT wrote:
mike_miller wrote:^ i think you are missing the point that the "pure capitalist model" means no regulation by the gov whatsoever...

accidents will always happen, the severity and frequency of those accidents is what matters


i'm actually fine with "no regulation by the gov whatsoever" so long as the legal environment is such that people are held fully accountable for the messes they make.

that's really the key ingredient, imo. without that, no form of regulation--be it voluntary self-regulation or regulation by the government--is going to work. accidents will be fairly frequent and fairly severe when people can claim that the damage they caused was within EPA regulated limits or can simply make a huge mess and pay a paltry sum towards those they've harmed thanks to liability caps.

Holding people "fully accountable for the messes they make" is a type of regulation. lol
Since when has regulation not worked to improve the environment and structure companies to account for employee safety? Part of the reason this mess happened is because that particular oil rig wasn't subject to the stricter government tests. The government agency responsible for oil company environmental standards decided to give BP a break. It's not an accident when it could have been prevented. An employee that was on the rig explained that the manager at the time didn't heed his warning and they decided to take the cheaper, less safe method. Another engineer from BP was fired when he explained that an accident was waiting to happen for that particular rig and others that are still in action.
Image

Return to Orlando Magic