Gilbert?
Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird
- MagicalMan
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,503
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jun 12, 2004
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,730
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 06, 2007
So let me get this straight. You guys are saying that you wouldn't go after Arenas because you have enough scoring in Rashard, Turk and company. let me see now
Rashard or Arenas? Hmmmm
Turk or Arenas? Hmmm
Even Turk & Rashard or Arenas? Hmmm
Its official you have all lost your minds.
Better to say that you wouldn't go after Arenas because you can't get him. Given that you have Rashard that cannot be traded with his enormous contract to put together any kind of package to either sign and trade for him or get cap relief that makes more sense - not some bogus rationale that we don''t need another bonafide superstar because what we have offensively makes getting Arenas pointless. sheesh.
Rashard or Arenas? Hmmmm
Turk or Arenas? Hmmm
Even Turk & Rashard or Arenas? Hmmm
Its official you have all lost your minds.
Better to say that you wouldn't go after Arenas because you can't get him. Given that you have Rashard that cannot be traded with his enormous contract to put together any kind of package to either sign and trade for him or get cap relief that makes more sense - not some bogus rationale that we don''t need another bonafide superstar because what we have offensively makes getting Arenas pointless. sheesh.
- MagicMadness
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 17,808
- And1: 3,390
- Joined: Jan 24, 2003
- Location: Orlando, FL
maginno wrote:
Better to say that you wouldn't go after Arenas because you can't get him. Given that you have Rashard that cannot be traded with his enormous contract to put together any kind of package to either sign and trade for him or get cap relief that makes more sense - not some bogus rationale that we don''t need another bonafide superstar because what we have offensively makes getting Arenas pointless. sheesh.
Um yeah, that's basically why any of us said no, focus on a defensive player instead. We have enough scoring i.e. Rashard can't be traded, so lets focus on defense. You should assume this is a given, without us needing to explain our reasoning considering this is a Magic board and we all know Lewis will be on the team next year, is being paid superstar money, and will not be moved.
Of course Arenas is a better scoring talent than Hedo or Lewis; I don't think any of us are or were disputing that.

-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,235
- And1: 990
- Joined: Dec 18, 2007
- Location: The Truth
Im seeming to be viewing this different from everyone. Sure this isnt new and players say they are opting out all the time but this situation is different.
Hes coming of season ending injury, and wants a long term contract from the wizards.
You have to believe there is hesitation in Washington about resigning him (see Grant Hill) while at the same time resigning an old Jamison.
If the wizards dont give him the big bucks then no one will...Because no one can.
He knows if he doesnt get the deal with the Wiz he will have to settle for MLE or just above it...He has no other options and he knows it.
Hes coming of season ending injury, and wants a long term contract from the wizards.
You have to believe there is hesitation in Washington about resigning him (see Grant Hill) while at the same time resigning an old Jamison.
If the wizards dont give him the big bucks then no one will...Because no one can.
He knows if he doesnt get the deal with the Wiz he will have to settle for MLE or just above it...He has no other options and he knows it.
- MagicalMan
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,503
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jun 12, 2004
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
mattyBoi wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Well people do like to pretend that wed be in better shape if Rashard would've signed for 80 million instead of 118. And others (or those same people) like to forget that we extended Dwight and Jameer putting us over the cap as well. But it never fails, someone will bring it up again.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,235
- And1: 990
- Joined: Dec 18, 2007
- Location: The Truth
MagicalMan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Well people do like to pretend that wed be in better shape if Rashard would've signed for 80 million instead of 118. And others (or those same people) like to forget that we extended Dwight and Jameer putting us over the cap as well. But it never fails, someone will bring it up again.
Oh i agree with you...Im just tired of hearing those people lol they only give rashard half a year to prove himself and then the doubts start coming.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,138
- And1: 964
- Joined: Jun 11, 2003
-
MagicalMan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Well people do like to pretend that wed be in better shape if Rashard would've signed for 80 million instead of 118. And others (or those same people) like to forget that we extended Dwight and Jameer putting us over the cap as well. But it never fails, someone will bring it up again.
Or the "I would have signed ______ for 44 million, and _______ for 36 million instead."
Because the NBA is apparently like NBA Live, and you can just do whatever you like.
Also, in the past week I've read someone suggest we could get Antawn Jamison and now Gilbert Arenas for the MLE. Wow.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,878
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 05, 2004
- Location: Orlando
It's no wonder they think management is doing a bad job when they think all these top-level players are going to sign for the MLE.
I don't care if Gilbert has been hurt. Even if the Wizards don't re-sign him -- and I believe they will -- someone is going to pay him. He's not only a good basketball player. He's a huge personality, and he sells tickets. Not everyone will want him because those factors also must fit into the team he signs with, but I don't expect him to leave Washington.
I don't care if Gilbert has been hurt. Even if the Wizards don't re-sign him -- and I believe they will -- someone is going to pay him. He's not only a good basketball player. He's a huge personality, and he sells tickets. Not everyone will want him because those factors also must fit into the team he signs with, but I don't expect him to leave Washington.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,235
- And1: 990
- Joined: Dec 18, 2007
- Location: The Truth
Its ok you guys just cant seem to grasp the fact that this summer will be a BUYERS MARKET.
Hardly anyone will have money to spend!!! Thetheif mentioned earlier that charlotte and the clippers will have cap space but that will ONLY happen if Bobcats let Okafor go and if Clips let Brand, Livingston, Cassell, and Maggette go.
You all will see this summer when many players with great potential (Calderon, Ellis, Maggette) are forced to sign for the MLE and many potential max players who arent happy and have already turned down huge deals (Igoudala, Okafor, Deng, Josh Smith just to name a few) will either have to accept their teams losing and take the deals or settle for substantially less or maybe even accept one year deals with teams.
Then there are the question marks like Brand(injured), Arenas(injured, publicly saying he will take less), and Jamison(Old) whos teams may not wanna give the long term deal too and they may either get mad at ownership or except it.
At least 5 players will be forced into contracts that are less than market value...Bet
Hardly anyone will have money to spend!!! Thetheif mentioned earlier that charlotte and the clippers will have cap space but that will ONLY happen if Bobcats let Okafor go and if Clips let Brand, Livingston, Cassell, and Maggette go.
You all will see this summer when many players with great potential (Calderon, Ellis, Maggette) are forced to sign for the MLE and many potential max players who arent happy and have already turned down huge deals (Igoudala, Okafor, Deng, Josh Smith just to name a few) will either have to accept their teams losing and take the deals or settle for substantially less or maybe even accept one year deals with teams.
Then there are the question marks like Brand(injured), Arenas(injured, publicly saying he will take less), and Jamison(Old) whos teams may not wanna give the long term deal too and they may either get mad at ownership or except it.
At least 5 players will be forced into contracts that are less than market value...Bet
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,235
- And1: 990
- Joined: Dec 18, 2007
- Location: The Truth
Also this is the reason Gilbert even made this public comment.
The team knows that no one else will give him a long term max deal and hes thinking that they may be trying to short him.
So hes saying if the Wizards dont give me my 7 year max deal then i will leave and play for a team that is a contender for what they can give me.
Essentially playing his cards and waiting to see what the wiz will do, while letting them know, hey if you dont give me what im worth ill just play to win.
But both parties know, if the Wiz dont give him max bucks, then no one can.
The team knows that no one else will give him a long term max deal and hes thinking that they may be trying to short him.
So hes saying if the Wizards dont give me my 7 year max deal then i will leave and play for a team that is a contender for what they can give me.
Essentially playing his cards and waiting to see what the wiz will do, while letting them know, hey if you dont give me what im worth ill just play to win.
But both parties know, if the Wiz dont give him max bucks, then no one can.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,878
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 05, 2004
- Location: Orlando
Nah, it's just that the Wizards are winning without him and Butler is staking a claim to be the team leader while he can't play so he has to remind people he still is out there.
Plus....those guys don't necessarily have to settle for the MLE with other teams. They might just take less-than-max contracts with their current teams.
It's not as black and white as you're trying to make it.
Plus....those guys don't necessarily have to settle for the MLE with other teams. They might just take less-than-max contracts with their current teams.
It's not as black and white as you're trying to make it.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,730
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 06, 2007
MagicMadness wrote:- You should assume this is a given, without us needing to explain our reasoning considering this is a Magic board and we all know Lewis will be on the team next year, is being paid superstar money, and will not be moved.
Don't be silly. There are enough words in the English language to convey what people mean without assumptions. It takes less words too in this case.
Besides anyone who reads the thread from the beginning will see that the discussion was of the possibility of getting him for expirings, trading or (later) the MLE. Nice try at covering there but it doesn't work. They were clearly saying we are set at scoring and wouldn't need Arenas. No matter how you try to dress it up its still pricelessly (to coin a word) funny.