Moderators: Howard Mass, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, ChosenSavior, UCFJayBird
OrlChamps2030 wrote:?
%'s on NBA 3's for some of the more notable prospects (no twins or scoot)
tiderulz wrote:Blue_and_Whte wrote:SOUL wrote:The funny thing from the like 50+ active posters we have I feel like everybody has a different version of getting better with picks or trades and it's all different..
Conclusion.. nobody knows what will make us better
I'm gonna appreciate the journey and support the rook(s) regardless
Me and some the posters if we pick Anthony Black and Coulibaly
but which one are you?
Cage 
IllMagic04 wrote:Taking Black at 6 doesn't necessarily mean a trade is coming. All it means is that we officially have given up on Suggs as a PG. We could go in next year with Fultz as the starter with Suggs at the SG. Then Black off the bench as the PG with Cole as the SG. Black guards the other teams SG depending on the matchup. Not saying it's what we should do but we could do that.
Black and Blue wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:Taking Black at 6 doesn't necessarily mean a trade is coming. All it means is that we officially have given up on Suggs as a PG. We could go in next year with Fultz as the starter with Suggs at the SG. Then Black off the bench as the PG with Cole as the SG. Black guards the other teams SG depending on the matchup. Not saying it's what we should do but we could do that.
It would be insane to have Suggs and Black as shooting guard duo. Our leading 3 point specialist in our starting lineup would be Wendell Carter lol.
Side note: You and I may be the only Orlando Magic-Baltimore Ravens fans on the planet. Cheers man.
. Thats pretty cool 
three3d wrote:OrlChamps2030 wrote:?
%'s on NBA 3's for some of the more notable prospects (no twins or scoot)
And Bilal is just very intriguing IMO. I don’t believe his ft% and fg% show he’s a great 3pt shooter so not really sure how to take those numbers. But it’s interesting because I’ve heard ft% indicates shooting ability and potential improvement.
IllMagic04 wrote:Black and Blue wrote:IllMagic04 wrote:Taking Black at 6 doesn't necessarily mean a trade is coming. All it means is that we officially have given up on Suggs as a PG. We could go in next year with Fultz as the starter with Suggs at the SG. Then Black off the bench as the PG with Cole as the SG. Black guards the other teams SG depending on the matchup. Not saying it's what we should do but we could do that.
It would be insane to have Suggs and Black as shooting guard duo. Our leading 3 point specialist in our starting lineup would be Wendell Carter lol.
Side note: You and I may be the only Orlando Magic-Baltimore Ravens fans on the planet. Cheers man.
Nah Id have Black as the backup point guard with Cole as the backup 2. But long term your right. If the plan is to move on from Fultz then we would be facing Black and Suggs in the back court
Yea I actually live in Baltimore. Since we don't have an NBA team I started rooting for the Magic when I was a kid and never could them go. So yea we probably are the only 2.
Orlando Dawg wrote:Magic don’t have a starting need for Hendricks,
Regarding Coolibaby, if he is available at #11 then San Antonio will be willing to overpay
Orlando Dawg wrote:Magic don’t have a starting need for Hendricks,
magicfan217 wrote:Orlando Dawg wrote:Magic don’t have a starting need for Hendricks,
Regarding Coolibaby, if he is available at #11 then San Antonio will be willing to overpay
The magic aren’t going to draft at day 1 starter at #6.
I think CP3 is still better than Beal.Black and Blue wrote:Poole for CP3. Washington is going berserk to remake that team in a short span. Good for them.
