Game #20: Magic(12-7) @ Pacers(12-6) 6PM EST SunSports

Viper1500 · Post #361 » by **Viper1500** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:13 am

VGOSWAMI wrote:lol at Duhon's assist. this is a joke

He has 4 and the game isn't even over? Jameer averages 5 lol

Deezy · Post #362 » by **Deezy** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:14 am

magic04life wrote:Wait, let me get this straight. All along, you have blamed Otis for this whole Dwight fiasco. You have said in the past that Otis should have kept Dwight more involved in the decision making process to keep him happy. And now you're saying Otis needs to 'hold to his convictions' instead of listening to Dwight?

You are unreal man.

Good point.

arkknight1988 · Post #363 » by **arkknight1988** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:15 am

no earl or wafer? yeah i guess hughes duhon and q are better

Reverse_Angle · Post #364 » by **Reverse_Angle** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:16 am

Cammo101 · Post #365 » by **Cammo101** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:16 am

arkknight1988 wrote:no earl or wafer? yeah i guess hughes duhon and q are better

Wafer getting no run frustrates me. We can't score and we have an instant offense guy rotting on our bench.

cb1115 · Post #366 » by **cb1115** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:17 am

richboy · Post #367 » by **richboy** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:17 am

People want to blame Stan but this team doesn't have that much talent. Just not enough offensive talent.

thelead · Post #368 » by **thelead** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:17 am

we try Earl now???

Post #369 » by **ChosenSavior** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:17 am

He puts Earl Clark in now??? :lol:

SolidSnake008 · Post #370 » by **SolidSnake008** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:17 am

Takes Ryan out for Earl Clark....there goes our offense right there...wrap this one up folks...

Cammo101 · Post #371 » by **Cammo101** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:17 am

This team has serious structural issues that likely can't be overcome by switching up rotations. That said, I'd still like Stan to try to go with guys like Wafer and Clark when nothing else seems to be working.

G-Heel · Post #372 » by **G-Heel** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:18 am

Time to tank!

And please, for the love of god, fire otis stupid smith now.

Deezy · Post #373 » by **Deezy** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:18 am

I heard boos.

rcklsscognition · Post #374 » by **rcklsscognition** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:19 am

We could easily cut 8 guys off the roster, replace them with random NBA bottom feeder guys, and never know they were gone.

Viper1500 · Post #375 » by **Viper1500** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:19 am

cb1115 wrote:

lol

Reverse_Angle · Post #376 » by **Reverse_Angle** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:19 am

did Stan just benched Dwight?

Post #377 » by **ChosenSavior** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:20 am

Viper1500 wrote:
cb1115 wrote:

lol

rcklsscognition · Post #378 » by **rcklsscognition** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:20 am

Amway just needs to boo as the game closes.

Post #379 » by **Bensational** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:20 am

magic04life wrote:
Bensational wrote:
magic04life wrote:
Otis picked up Big Baby because Dwight Howard wanted him. Davis is the biggest black-hole on the team.

Are YOU dense about that?

Last i checked Dwight wasn't the GM, and isn't responsible for the moves the GM makes. any player that steps on that court is on Otis' head, no matter who asks for them to be there. if Otis is that weak in his convictions about who is a good player and deserves to be on his team, then he's failed.

but then, i wouldn't expect you to be able to see that through the fog of Dwight hate around you.

Wait, let me get this straight. All along, you have blamed Otis for this whole Dwight fiasco. You have said in the past that Otis should have kept Dwight more involved in the decision making process to keep him happy. And now you're saying Otis needs to 'hold to his convictions' instead of listening to Dwight?

You are unreal man.

lol, i have never said Dwight should be involved in the decision making. i have said that if he's unhappy, then make changes. perhaps you should pay more attention.

Deezy · Post #380 » by **Deezy** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:20 am

When Dwight was walking to the bench, there were boos.