pepe1991 wrote:tiderulz wrote:pepe1991 wrote:
How many nba teams are owned by person that has net worth of $21 000 000 000 that will just roll eye and pay luxury tax for years for team that isn't contender, yet is almost every year highest payed roster in basketball?
That's Portland, and Lillard and his massive contract ( just like massive contracts of Gasol, Conley, KAT, Wiggins....) are main reasons why their teams simply can't add enough peaces around them to contend.
People forget that main reason why Warriors were able to crate dinasty is because Curry played on contract lesser than Fultz 4th year option.
As for Kemba, for bleacher report , 4 different execs around nba literally said " stay or go ,Hornets are f**ked" because he is getting his max or leaving.
while you're statements are true, they dont disprove that some big name stars have been happy in small markets.
Money makes them happy, not situation or ability to contend.
NBA changed rules to allow current team to offer by far the most when it comes to contract nogotions. From ability to get supermax, 5th year, early extension....
really? Wade/Lebron/Bosh all took less money to win. Dirk has taken less money. Durant took less money to win in GS( i dont think he will next contract). Lillard took less money. Cousins took less money for a chance at a title. Lou Williams.
not every player will only play for a team for the absolute max possible to them.