BaTATAS 1.0 You can UNSTICKY
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- LBPTarHeel27
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,833
- And1: 1,512
- Joined: Jul 10, 2004
- Location: Right behind you
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- LBPTarHeel27
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,833
- And1: 1,512
- Joined: Jul 10, 2004
- Location: Right behind you
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
WillyJakkz wrote:Hard for spacing to be a factor when he wasn't getting the majority of touches or rather fga's.
Nice team but no one to do the dirty work and get extra possessions imho, and when they did get extra chance points I'm sure someone other than Shaq shot the ball.
Shaq and Reggie Miller could've been dominant, even w Melo, Tim Hardaway and Larry Johnson did them in.
I think the pecking order was a little hard to establish on that squad.
Edit: Yep, checked the boxscores and Shaq shot more than Melo once the whole series.
Yeah I dont understand the people that expected more. When you have four guys that need the ball in their hands and then a fifth that works well off the ball but still needs shots...how can you expect shaq to be dominant?
Not sure how possible it would have been but this would be a great team around shaq...
PG Jason Kidd or John Stockton type PG
SG Reggie Miller or Ray Allen type SG
SF Dan Majerle type SF
PF Antawn Jamison type PF
C Shaq
I guarantee a team like that would dominate the current roster, despite the "talent" drop off.

Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- lilroddyb
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,470
- And1: 1,393
- Joined: Aug 06, 2011
- Location: Iceland
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:WillyJakkz wrote:Hard for spacing to be a factor when he wasn't getting the majority of touches or rather fga's.
Nice team but no one to do the dirty work and get extra possessions imho, and when they did get extra chance points I'm sure someone other than Shaq shot the ball.
Shaq and Reggie Miller could've been dominant, even w Melo, Tim Hardaway and Larry Johnson did them in.
I think the pecking order was a little hard to establish on that squad.
Edit: Yep, checked the boxscores and Shaq shot more than Melo once the whole series.
Yeah I dont understand the people that expected more. When you have four guys that need the ball in their hands and then a fifth that works well off the ball but still needs shots...how can you expect shaq to be dominant?
Not sure how possible it would have been but this would be a great team around shaq...
PG Jason Kidd or John Stockton type PG
SG Reggie Miller or Ray Allen type SG
SF Dan Majerle type SF
PF Antawn Jamison type PF
C Shaq
I guarantee a team like that would dominate the current roster, despite the "talent" drop off.
Yea both of you guys have some good points
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
Gunna start simming in about an hour fellas...probably wrap it all up by this evening.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
-
WillyJakkz
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,904
- And1: 3,507
- Joined: Jun 10, 2009
- Location: Orlando FL
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
^ Hornets Spurs should be a great matchup.
Gonna be some great matchups today period.
Also think I get eliminated by that Sonics team, bad matchup for us.
Thought guys said old timers get disrespected in this sim.... Wilt Chamberlain etc have been playing phenomenal.
Gonna be some great matchups today period.
Also think I get eliminated by that Sonics team, bad matchup for us.
Thought guys said old timers get disrespected in this sim.... Wilt Chamberlain etc have been playing phenomenal.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- lilroddyb
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,470
- And1: 1,393
- Joined: Aug 06, 2011
- Location: Iceland
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
Wilt is putting up some ridiculous numbers.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- Grinditout
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,618
- And1: 2,752
- Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
Hornets pulling off the upset. Anything can happen in any of the series.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
-
WillyJakkz
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,904
- And1: 3,507
- Joined: Jun 10, 2009
- Location: Orlando FL
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
Grinditout wrote:Hornets pulling off the upset. Anything can happen in any of the series.
Honestly thought it woulda been an upset if the Spurs beat the Hornets.
I had them ranked 1st overall, Wilt just too unstoppable along w Barry, Spurs not enough offensive muscle to counter.
No "go to guy" from what I saw though very nice offensively all around, more like a team effort.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
-
WillyJakkz
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,904
- And1: 3,507
- Joined: Jun 10, 2009
- Location: Orlando FL
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
Hey spree8, the asterisk next to players in statsheet denotes starters so you don't necessarily need to photo DC if you don't want, it'll cut down on extra work 
And appreciate you running the sims man!
And appreciate you running the sims man!
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- Smash3
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,783
- And1: 9,982
- Joined: Apr 17, 2009
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
Nice comeback by the Hornets, down 2-0
8
G: James Harden | Kris Dunn
G: Bradley Beal | Josh Richardson
F: Paul George | Svi Mykhailiuk
F: Neemias Queta| Daniel Theis
C: Nikola Vucevic | Bismack Biyombo
G: James Harden | Kris Dunn
G: Bradley Beal | Josh Richardson
F: Paul George | Svi Mykhailiuk
F: Neemias Queta| Daniel Theis
C: Nikola Vucevic | Bismack Biyombo
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
WillyJakkz wrote:Hey spree8, the asterisk next to players in statsheet denotes starters so you don't necessarily need to photo DC if you don't want, it'll cut down on extra work
And appreciate you running the sims man!
No problemo lol...but I'm really posting it for the records to be shown...not so much the DC. This way people can see I did the exact amount of games it took to end the series, and not any more to get biased results.
So if a team starts with 0-0, and loses in 5 games they can see their new record is 0-5 when I'm finished...showing I didn't like not count games they actually won....plus I don't wanna have someone come along and run a sim on their own later, and we have a different record...rather just cover my butt and post it before and after so there's no suspicion or anything lol.
Re: BaTATAS 1.0 JUDGEMENT & DISCUSSION - SCORES ARE IN! CHEC
- spree8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,419
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: Jun 05, 2001
-



























