Xatticus wrote:pepe1991 wrote:For Magic, as "passable" as Gordon and Isaac were this year as duo, in both cases team played better when one of them was replaced by Ross.
That's quantifiable, measurable fact.
Well... the Isaac/Gordon/Fournier lineup (+0.1) was actually better than the Isaac/Ross/Fournier lineup (-5.5). The Isaac/Gordon/Ross lineup (+18.9) was far better than any of the combinations involving Fournier.
Not gonna say how much they played ? Because that's context , that does not exist when you put vague things like that ,and is used to create and fill agenda or bias.
Gordon,ROss and Isaac only played 71 min together.
For example Evan, Ross and Gordon played 580 min together.
DJ, Vuc and Gordon 1544. min.
It' completely insignificant sample size to care about. Vučević , Ross and MCW have net rating of +40, best among any Magic 3 men lineups, with at least 20 min played ( they played 32) . That's why it's important to use sample size of at least 200 min to get any realistic outlook on that.
If we are using stats to put up personal crap, here is one , .M. Carter-Williams, .J. Martin, .A. Jefferson are better 3 men lineup than Isaac, Ross and Gordon, by wide margin. With net rating of +35