ImageImageImageImage

The case for Jaden McDaniels

Moderators: Howard Mass, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, UCFJayBird, ChosenSavior

Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,828
And1: 8,630
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#41 » by Skybox » Fri Oct 30, 2020 12:38 pm

drsd wrote:
Skybox wrote:You know who was REALLY skinny?...Dwight Howard


The width of his shoulders led all scouts to conclude he had potential to have huge upper body strength, which occurred.

Image



McDaniels now looks more like Isaac out of high school (I see limited physical space for upper body girth):

Image


Image


Absolutely. Dwight is genetically something special...I do remember a pic of him (I think in ESPN mag) right after he got drafted. No shirt on, side view...he looked like a question mark-so skinny. I was full on team Emeka Okafor, so don't ever listen to me again. :banghead:
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,599
And1: 19,707
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#42 » by pepe1991 » Fri Oct 30, 2020 12:47 pm

Image

18 y.o. Howard



Image
18 y.o. McDaniels


This is like comparing JJ Barea to Donovan MItchell....
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
Xatticus
Head Coach
Posts: 6,801
And1: 8,290
Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Location: the land of the blind
         

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#43 » by Xatticus » Fri Oct 30, 2020 2:03 pm

drsd wrote:
MagicFan101 wrote:You have to play the game.

GSW had the #1 odds and got #2 pick
Clev had the #2 odds and got #5 pick
Minny had the #3 odds and got the #1 pick

Not so terrible at the top 3

Interesting spots were:
Charlotte: went from #9 up to #3



In 2019:
The Pelicans had the #7 odds and got #1 pick
The Grizz had the #8 odds and got #2 pick
The Knicks had the #1 odds and got #3 pick
The Lakers had the #11 odds and got #4 pick
The Cavs had the #2 odds and got #5 pick
The Suns had the #3 odds and got #6 pick
The Bulls had the #4 odds and got #7 pick
The Hawks had the #5 odds and got #8 pick
The Wiz had the #6 odds and got #9 pick

In other words, the top 6 teams all dropped at least two slots, most three slots.
Last year proved why tanking can back-fire hugely.


..


It can. We don't really need the evidence of it for proof though. We know the rules and we can quite easily calculate the expected values. The fact remains, however, that you have the better odds of getting the better talent if you lose more games. If our target in next year's draft is Cade Cunningham, nothing we can do will increase our chances of selecting him so much as would losing more games than anyone else.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
BlueBlazer
Junior
Posts: 251
And1: 101
Joined: Feb 07, 2019
 

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#44 » by BlueBlazer » Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:23 pm

Skin wrote:
BlueBlazer wrote:
Skin wrote:Not only can the guy shoot, his shot and release point is nearly unblockable.

Nobody in this draft should be comparing their stats to Kevin Durant. We're talking about the 15th pick here. People need to be reasonable.

40% from the field at 6’10? Yikes

It's a matter of projection. People believe in Edwards and Ball in the Top 3 while they shoot 40% or lower.

Noticed you added the 6'10 comment to avoid that comparison, but JM wasn't a typical 6'10 post player where those types usually have high FG% because they play in the post and get easy baskets.

I get what you’re saying but that percentage doesn’t exactly scream “innate feel for using his height to his advantage.” If he has a virtually unblockable release, that’s even more of an indictment IMO.
“I thought our Director of Scouting was just another name for a tape measure.” - StanVanGandhi
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,516
And1: 8,806
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#45 » by Skin » Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:50 pm

Train has fallen off the tracks with this JM to D12 body comparison. lol

Isaac is much closer. I see his body type potential in the mold of these guys with similar height/weight at the same point in time.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

And the fact that Jaden already gained 15 pounds from HS to College is a good sign of positive growth. At an NBA SF projection, I don't have any bad feelings about JM being able to withstand the NBA game.

Image
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,516
And1: 8,806
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#46 » by Skin » Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:11 pm

BlueBlazer wrote:
Skin wrote:
BlueBlazer wrote:40% from the field at 6’10? Yikes

It's a matter of projection. People believe in Edwards and Ball in the Top 3 while they shoot 40% or lower.

Noticed you added the 6'10 comment to avoid that comparison, but JM wasn't a typical 6'10 post player where those types usually have high FG% because they play in the post and get easy baskets.

I get what you’re saying but that percentage doesn’t exactly scream “innate feel for using his height to his advantage.” If he has a virtually unblockable release, that’s even more of an indictment IMO.

Being blockable/unblockable is only one aspect of FG%. Where JM had issues with was his shot selection and inconsistencies with his base/footwork.

Here's one report to give you an idea.

https://www.babcockhoops.com/post/video-breakdown-jaden-mcdaniels

McDaniels’ ability to shoot on the perimeter will likely control his career floor. If he becomes reliable as an outside shooter, he will be able to add some value to a rotation, at the very least. His shooting mechanics are clean for the most part, as he utilizes a two-motion shot with a deceptively quick release — especially for a player with his length. When given a decent look, he wastes no movement getting to his high release point, making it difficult for his defender to contend. He was blocked only once in 127 three-point attempts this season. He converted 33.9% from beyond the arc, and while that percentage is not as high as you’d like from a potential first-round pick, I attribute his low shooting percentage more to his shot selection rather than his shooting mechanics or underlying ability. He’s a strong catch-and-shooter and he can also create space with an effective hesitation pull up dribble. Despite possessing a knack to hit tough shots, there were numerous plays this season that likely left Coach Mike Hopkins scratching his head. His pre-shot footwork is also worth monitoring, as well as his landing zones; both are sporadic and inconsistent at times. He will need some fine-tuning during his development process with these things. McDaniels’ decision making and shot selection will need to improve in order for him to be successful at the NBA level, but his unique ability to create and shoot from deep should not be ignored. In regards to his ability to create his own shot, he’s one of the best in the entire 2020 class, and probably only second to Anthony Edwards from Georgia.


Update on him honing his mechanics. Worth a listen.

Read on Twitter


Almost seven months removed from a freshman season that McDaniels described as upsetting, he regularly ripped off 15 treys in a row, handled the ball like a guard with tremendous footwork, played above the rim, dropped in floaters with soft touch and showed off his 9-foot-1 standing reach in verticality drills. It served as a reminder of why we briefly ranked him as the top prospect in the draft before he got to the University of Washington in January 2019. -- ESPN Insider, Mike Schmitz
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66,619
And1: 16,423
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#47 » by Howard Mass » Sat Oct 31, 2020 1:33 am

Skin,

I love how you do these each year.

I'm for BPA at #15 and it could be your guy.
R.I.P. Dharam Raghubir (A.K.A. Magnumt)

:beer:
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 28,641
And1: 8,356
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#48 » by RookieStar » Sat Oct 31, 2020 2:13 am

I gotta admit there is a case for him but Im just tired if our GM always drafting the longboi bigman. I want a scoring guard this time.

Also, how does he stack up/compare against our red shirt rookie Okeke?
zaymon
Head Coach
Posts: 6,181
And1: 3,479
Joined: Jul 01, 2015
   

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#49 » by zaymon » Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:14 pm

RookieStar wrote:I gotta admit there is a case for him but Im just tired if our GM always drafting the longboi bigman. I want a scoring guard this time.

Also, how does he stack up/compare against our red shirt rookie Okeke?


They are both forwards, McDaniels is taller but Okeke is longer and with stronger frame.
They are both fluid athletes, both not very explosive, McDaniels quicker.
Okeke is much more accurate shooter, McDaniels is better at getting his shot off.
Okeke is great off the ball, McDaniels is not moving much.
Okeke is in another tier as a post up player and finisher
Okeke is better passer and much better decision maker.
Okeke is much better team defender, has much quicker hands, is much better rebounder, fouls less.

Unless you project McDaniels to transform into first option offensively Okeke is better at almost everything else.
My money is on Banchero going number 1 !
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 28,641
And1: 8,356
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#50 » by RookieStar » Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:42 pm

zaymon wrote:
RookieStar wrote:I gotta admit there is a case for him but Im just tired if our GM always drafting the longboi bigman. I want a scoring guard this time.

Also, how does he stack up/compare against our red shirt rookie Okeke?


They are both forwards, McDaniels is taller but Okeke is longer and with stronger frame.
They are both fluid athletes, both not very explosive, McDaniels quicker.
Okeke is much more accurate shooter, McDaniels is better at getting his shot off.
Okeke is great off the ball, McDaniels is not moving much.
Okeke is in another tier as a post up player and finisher
Okeke is better passer and much better decision maker.
Okeke is much better team defender, has much quicker hands, is much better rebounder, fouls less.

Unless you project McDaniels to transform into first option offensively Okeke is better at almost everything else.


Thanks.

If that is all true then I don't think we need Jaden as we have another rookie that's basically better than him already.
zaymon
Head Coach
Posts: 6,181
And1: 3,479
Joined: Jul 01, 2015
   

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#51 » by zaymon » Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:56 pm

RookieStar wrote:
zaymon wrote:
RookieStar wrote:I gotta admit there is a case for him but Im just tired if our GM always drafting the longboi bigman. I want a scoring guard this time.

Also, how does he stack up/compare against our red shirt rookie Okeke?


They are both forwards, McDaniels is taller but Okeke is longer and with stronger frame.
They are both fluid athletes, both not very explosive, McDaniels quicker.
Okeke is much more accurate shooter, McDaniels is better at getting his shot off.
Okeke is great off the ball, McDaniels is not moving much.
Okeke is in another tier as a post up player and finisher
Okeke is better passer and much better decision maker.
Okeke is much better team defender, has much quicker hands, is much better rebounder, fouls less.

Unless you project McDaniels to transform into first option offensively Okeke is better at almost everything else.


Thanks.

If that is all true then I don't think we need Jaden as we have another rookie that's basically better than him already.


It all depends on perceived role and development. Some think McDaniels could be someone like Tatum or Durant, maybe Ingram( i dont)- highly efficient self creators.
Okeke has smaller chance to become that taking into account his college carrier.
Personally i pick Okeke 9 out of 10 times in regard to their outcomes.
My money is on Banchero going number 1 !
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,911
And1: 11,335
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#52 » by KillMonger » Sun Nov 1, 2020 12:38 am

RookieStar wrote:
zaymon wrote:
RookieStar wrote:I gotta admit there is a case for him but Im just tired if our GM always drafting the longboi bigman. I want a scoring guard this time.

Also, how does he stack up/compare against our red shirt rookie Okeke?


They are both forwards, McDaniels is taller but Okeke is longer and with stronger frame.
They are both fluid athletes, both not very explosive, McDaniels quicker.
Okeke is much more accurate shooter, McDaniels is better at getting his shot off.
Okeke is great off the ball, McDaniels is not moving much.
Okeke is in another tier as a post up player and finisher
Okeke is better passer and much better decision maker.
Okeke is much better team defender, has much quicker hands, is much better rebounder, fouls less.

Unless you project McDaniels to transform into first option offensively Okeke is better at almost everything else.


Thanks.

If that is all true then I don't think we need Jaden as we have another rookie that's basically better than him already.

i'm taking both, at #15 you don't get much better at least potential wise unless someone falls
Image
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,516
And1: 8,806
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#53 » by Skin » Sun Nov 1, 2020 1:05 am

RookieStar wrote:I gotta admit there is a case for him but Im just tired if our GM always drafting the longboi bigman. I want a scoring guard this time.

Also, how does he stack up/compare against our red shirt rookie Okeke?

Everyone wants a scoring guard at 15. Problem is the options available. The candidates are underwhelming. I do like Ramsey if I absolutely had to take one. Do you have a favorite?

Our GM wants length at every position. McDaniels is a long boi but he projects as a wing, not a big man (like you said).

I have high hopes for Okeke. I liked the pick a lot. But he doesn't detract my interest in McDaniels because Okeke is more of an off ball player. He's very effective in his limited role as a complimentary player. Typical glue guy. X factor. Can probably play 3 and D at both SF and PF. He's built and moves more like a PF. In an ideal world, he plays a role on a team similar to the way Jae Crowder fills his role. But Okeke has to get a lot stronger.

McDaniels is a scoring wing, not a big. He is better suited as a SF than a PF. If I saw him as a PF, then I would drop him down the board. One month into being 20 years old and he has all the makings, he just needs to put it all together. McDaniels is different because he can make things happen with the ball in his hands. He's quicker, more agile, more explosive and has a much better handle.

I think we are really lucky this year because the NBA is sleeping on this guy. Had he gone to Duke, not sure he'd make it out of the lottery. He has the talent pedigree. Washington was a bad team, but that was his hometown team. Not sure you can pin their losing on an incoming freshman, but it does show loyalty over being a front runner. Maybe overly sensitive to that as a Magic fan lol.
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,516
And1: 8,806
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#54 » by Skin » Sun Nov 1, 2020 1:12 am

zaymon wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
zaymon wrote:
They are both forwards, McDaniels is taller but Okeke is longer and with stronger frame.
They are both fluid athletes, both not very explosive, McDaniels quicker.
Okeke is much more accurate shooter, McDaniels is better at getting his shot off.
Okeke is great off the ball, McDaniels is not moving much.
Okeke is in another tier as a post up player and finisher
Okeke is better passer and much better decision maker.
Okeke is much better team defender, has much quicker hands, is much better rebounder, fouls less.

Unless you project McDaniels to transform into first option offensively Okeke is better at almost everything else.


Thanks.

If that is all true then I don't think we need Jaden as we have another rookie that's basically better than him already.


It all depends on perceived role and development. Some think McDaniels could be someone like Tatum or Durant, maybe Ingram( i dont)- highly efficient self creators.
Okeke has smaller chance to become that taking into account his college carrier.
Personally i pick Okeke 9 out of 10 times in regard to their outcomes.

Durant, Tatum, Ingram... these comparisons are unfair. I liken the body type, but they all have varying ceilings. Not to mention, those guys are Top 3 picks. McDaniels is a reach at 15 for many mocks out there. Let's keep things in perspective. We'd have to get really really lucky for JM to get mentioned in the same sentence as those guys one day. Can it happen? I believe he gives us a better chance than anyone else projected to be available, so why not? At least he has the pedigree, seeing he was the top HS prospect at one point before the season started.

Also, in comparing Okeke to McDaniels, don't forget Okeke came out after 2 years of college ball and his first NBA year is done. If I project McDaniels over the same time span, I see a much superior player when he's the age that Okeke is now.
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 28,641
And1: 8,356
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#55 » by RookieStar » Sun Nov 1, 2020 3:44 am

Skin wrote:
RookieStar wrote:I gotta admit there is a case for him but Im just tired if our GM always drafting the longboi bigman. I want a scoring guard this time.

Also, how does he stack up/compare against our red shirt rookie Okeke?

Everyone wants a scoring guard at 15. Problem is the options available. The candidates are underwhelming. I do like Ramsey if I absolutely had to take one. Do you have a favorite?

Our GM wants length at every position. McDaniels is a long boi but he projects as a wing, not a big man (like you said).

I have high hopes for Okeke. I liked the pick a lot. But he doesn't detract my interest in McDaniels because Okeke is more of an off ball player. He's very effective in his limited role as a complimentary player. Typical glue guy. X factor. Can probably play 3 and D at both SF and PF. He's built and moves more like a PF. In an ideal world, he plays a role on a team similar to the way Jae Crowder fills his role. But Okeke has to get a lot stronger.

McDaniels is a scoring wing, not a big. He is better suited as a SF than a PF. If I saw him as a PF, then I would drop him down the board. One month into being 20 years old and he has all the makings, he just needs to put it all together. McDaniels is different because he can make things happen with the ball in his hands. He's quicker, more agile, more explosive and has a much better handle.

I think we are really lucky this year because the NBA is sleeping on this guy. Had he gone to Duke, not sure he'd make it out of the lottery. He has the talent pedigree. Washington was a bad team, but that was his hometown team. Not sure you can pin their losing on an incoming freshman, but it does show loyalty over being a front runner. Maybe overly sensitive to that as a Magic fan lol.


Favorite? No... but any of the 3pt shooting, scoring guys with suspect defense expected to be in our range is good enough for me. My attitude would change though 1 week before the draft because thats when more info would. Ome out.

Actually me being a duke fan i sometimes get high school prospects and what i heard/impessed before their freshmen year was rhat JM was supposedly a F/C not a wing? My info could ve wrong though.

And yeah for me JM is more of the run around fluid guy in the mold of a KD/Ingram rather than Okeke which i get is nore on the bruiser type
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,516
And1: 8,806
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#56 » by Skin » Sun Nov 1, 2020 4:25 am

RookieStar wrote:
Skin wrote:
RookieStar wrote:I gotta admit there is a case for him but Im just tired if our GM always drafting the longboi bigman. I want a scoring guard this time.

Also, how does he stack up/compare against our red shirt rookie Okeke?

Everyone wants a scoring guard at 15. Problem is the options available. The candidates are underwhelming. I do like Ramsey if I absolutely had to take one. Do you have a favorite?

Our GM wants length at every position. McDaniels is a long boi but he projects as a wing, not a big man (like you said).

I have high hopes for Okeke. I liked the pick a lot. But he doesn't detract my interest in McDaniels because Okeke is more of an off ball player. He's very effective in his limited role as a complimentary player. Typical glue guy. X factor. Can probably play 3 and D at both SF and PF. He's built and moves more like a PF. In an ideal world, he plays a role on a team similar to the way Jae Crowder fills his role. But Okeke has to get a lot stronger.

McDaniels is a scoring wing, not a big. He is better suited as a SF than a PF. If I saw him as a PF, then I would drop him down the board. One month into being 20 years old and he has all the makings, he just needs to put it all together. McDaniels is different because he can make things happen with the ball in his hands. He's quicker, more agile, more explosive and has a much better handle.

I think we are really lucky this year because the NBA is sleeping on this guy. Had he gone to Duke, not sure he'd make it out of the lottery. He has the talent pedigree. Washington was a bad team, but that was his hometown team. Not sure you can pin their losing on an incoming freshman, but it does show loyalty over being a front runner. Maybe overly sensitive to that as a Magic fan lol.


Favorite? No... but any of the 3pt shooting, scoring guys with suspect defense expected to be in our range is good enough for me. My attitude would change though 1 week before the draft because thats when more info would. Ome out.

Actually me being a duke fan i sometimes get high school prospects and what i heard/impessed before their freshmen year was rhat JM was supposedly a F/C not a wing? My info could ve wrong though.

And yeah for me JM is more of the run around fluid guy in the mold of a KD/Ingram rather than Okeke which i get is nore on the bruiser type

You can easily get a 3pt shooting guy with suspect defense much later in the draft, even going deep into round 2. It's one of the reasons I didn't want to teach for one at 15. Bane, Hughes, Woodley, Stanley, Joe, Quickly, Nwora.... take your pick.
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,944
And1: 5,506
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#57 » by fendilim » Sun Nov 1, 2020 5:01 am

Skin wrote:
BlueBlazer wrote:
Skin wrote:It's a matter of projection. People believe in Edwards and Ball in the Top 3 while they shoot 40% or lower.

Noticed you added the 6'10 comment to avoid that comparison, but JM wasn't a typical 6'10 post player where those types usually have high FG% because they play in the post and get easy baskets.

I get what you’re saying but that percentage doesn’t exactly scream “innate feel for using his height to his advantage.” If he has a virtually unblockable release, that’s even more of an indictment IMO.

Being blockable/unblockable is only one aspect of FG%. Where JM had issues with was his shot selection and inconsistencies with his base/footwork.

Here's one report to give you an idea.

https://www.babcockhoops.com/post/video-breakdown-jaden-mcdaniels

McDaniels’ ability to shoot on the perimeter will likely control his career floor. If he becomes reliable as an outside shooter, he will be able to add some value to a rotation, at the very least. His shooting mechanics are clean for the most part, as he utilizes a two-motion shot with a deceptively quick release — especially for a player with his length. When given a decent look, he wastes no movement getting to his high release point, making it difficult for his defender to contend. He was blocked only once in 127 three-point attempts this season. He converted 33.9% from beyond the arc, and while that percentage is not as high as you’d like from a potential first-round pick, I attribute his low shooting percentage more to his shot selection rather than his shooting mechanics or underlying ability. He’s a strong catch-and-shooter and he can also create space with an effective hesitation pull up dribble. Despite possessing a knack to hit tough shots, there were numerous plays this season that likely left Coach Mike Hopkins scratching his head. His pre-shot footwork is also worth monitoring, as well as his landing zones; both are sporadic and inconsistent at times. He will need some fine-tuning during his development process with these things. McDaniels’ decision making and shot selection will need to improve in order for him to be successful at the NBA level, but his unique ability to create and shoot from deep should not be ignored. In regards to his ability to create his own shot, he’s one of the best in the entire 2020 class, and probably only second to Anthony Edwards from Georgia.


Update on him honing his mechanics. Worth a listen.

Read on Twitter


Almost seven months removed from a freshman season that McDaniels described as upsetting, he regularly ripped off 15 treys in a row, handled the ball like a guard with tremendous footwork, played above the rim, dropped in floaters with soft touch and showed off his 9-foot-1 standing reach in verticality drills. It served as a reminder of why we briefly ranked him as the top prospect in the draft before he got to the University of Washington in January 2019. -- ESPN Insider, Mike Schmitz

His stroke reminds me of Isaac’s.
Image
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 38,115
And1: 15,103
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#58 » by basketballRob » Sun Nov 1, 2020 4:39 pm

To be honest I'd rather have a player with a developed body this year. We always hear that a player will be good once they gain 30 lbs or so, but sometimes they never do. It makes things so much easier when they're physically ready from day 1.

Sure everyone refers to Howard's size gains, but he was physically ready to play 82 games his rookie year. Terry and McDaniels aren't ready. They should play another year in college and try to develop.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
yoyojw17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,870
And1: 3,460
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Location: Gainesville,FL
 

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#59 » by yoyojw17 » Sun Nov 1, 2020 5:26 pm

As i've said in other posts.... not sure if i'll make that my primary pick if all we had was the #15.... because there are a lot of players that fit positional and talent needs at that range that would be available. BUUUUUTTTTT if we could get a second mid first rounder while filling a need with the other pick... i'm totally down with picking him up. I do see him as offensive Isaac... we will see more offensive potential while still getting the defensive perks. I know people might knock the entire length thing.... but when you have a group of players all defensively switchable with 6'10'" wingspans.... the court can become really small.... really quickly. His down year and transition into college could become our benefit.

not sure if Fournier + #45 can fetch us another mid to late 1st rounder... but i'll entertain it and get nesmith, lewis, terry, bey, green,hampton, etc + McDaniels out this draft. :-)
MasterGMer
Analyst
Posts: 3,717
And1: 772
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
   

Re: The case for Jaden McDaniels 

Post#60 » by MasterGMer » Sun Nov 1, 2020 6:23 pm

I do not like Jaden. I don't trust his Shot Selection and I do not like his understanding of the game. He just doesn't get it.

Return to Orlando Magic