ImageImageImageImage

Who wants KCP?

Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 35,259
And1: 13,570
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#41 » by basketballRob » Tue May 6, 2025 4:03 pm

Skybox wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
zaymon wrote:
I agree Reaves is propably too expensive for us and is not good enough playmaker of defender for our needs.


I think he is great fit, underrated playmaker and very good player. But guy averages 20-6. He will get his $35M from somebody eventually.

I don't give a f??? about guard defense, our offense is unwatchable parody of basketball, if we can't find OFFENSIVE play maker who will give them another scoring punch and much needed offensive order, we are going nowhere any time soon.

Jokić, Murray, Porter are former nba champions, neither can guard his position well. Knicks are up 1-0 vs Celtics with Towns and Brunson.
Pacers look solid with team filled with questionable defenders, both Warriors starting guards are below average defenders.

I would take Reaves in a heartbeat if i can get rid of Isaac at some point next year to make salary pocked to keep him.


I think Reaves would be a significant enough add that you get him and look at the rest of the roster to find places to skimp over the next couple of years. When Weltman turns the corner into serious contention, he has to know that you need stars up front, bargains on the bench...On ORL, with the defensive support, Reaves could become an All-Star offensive weapon...not in a 30ppg Paolo way, but more like a mini-Jokic....shooting, scoring, playmaking, drawing fouls - whatever needs to be done that night to win...I really trust his BBIQ.
https://youtu.be/u-pP_dCenJA?si=LTcxq6Vh58hRomSN

Sent from my SM-G998U1 using RealGM mobile app
zaymon
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,988
And1: 3,356
Joined: Jul 01, 2015
   

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#42 » by zaymon » Tue May 6, 2025 5:38 pm

VFX wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
zaymon wrote:
I agree Reaves is propably too expensive for us and is not good enough playmaker of defender for our needs.


I think he is great fit, underrated playmaker and very good player. But guy averages 20-6. He will get his $35M from somebody eventually.

I don't give a f??? about guard defense, our offense is unwatchable parody of basketball, if we can't find OFFENSIVE play maker who will give them another scoring punch and much needed offensive order, we are going nowhere any time soon.

Jokić, Murray, Porter are former nba champions, neither can guard his position well. Knicks are up 1-0 vs Celtics with Towns and Brunson.
Pacers look solid with team filled with questionable defenders, both Warriors starting guards are below average defenders.

I would take Reaves in a heartbeat if i can get rid of Isaac at some point next year to make salary pocked to keep him.


Agree.

This is why Weltman has an uphill battle.

He has to shed a TON of undesirable contracts this season to acquire any of these guards looking at upcoming pricier extensions (Coby White and Reaves).

It’s just more than “move players XYZ for good player and hope the value makes sense”. I just think he will end up having to attach picks + possibly AB to move off all this stupid money he can’t access otherwise for 2+ seasons.

Like, you have to get rid of 4-5 overpriced scrubs this offseason if you want to be in conversations with these players the same offseason you sign Paolo to a max contract. They have to do this while getting bench players back that make sense.

You basically have to move KCP, Carter, Isaac, Cole, possibly Goga, decline and restructure Moe, and decline Gary if we are talking about adding more salary.


At least we have those mid sized contracts. In the length of the contract none of them is overpayed. Yes we will have to attach picks but that was the plan all along. If they were good enough we would not have to trade them in the first place.
Salaries become strict. Teams will have to move decent players for financial reasons. Its not as bad as it seems. Easier than moving Vuc, AG and Fournier in one deadline.
My money is on Banchero going number 1 !
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,031
And1: 15,882
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#43 » by VFX » Tue May 6, 2025 5:43 pm

zaymon wrote:
VFX wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
I think he is great fit, underrated playmaker and very good player. But guy averages 20-6. He will get his $35M from somebody eventually.

I don't give a f??? about guard defense, our offense is unwatchable parody of basketball, if we can't find OFFENSIVE play maker who will give them another scoring punch and much needed offensive order, we are going nowhere any time soon.

Jokić, Murray, Porter are former nba champions, neither can guard his position well. Knicks are up 1-0 vs Celtics with Towns and Brunson.
Pacers look solid with team filled with questionable defenders, both Warriors starting guards are below average defenders.

I would take Reaves in a heartbeat if i can get rid of Isaac at some point next year to make salary pocked to keep him.


Agree.

This is why Weltman has an uphill battle.

He has to shed a TON of undesirable contracts this season to acquire any of these guards looking at upcoming pricier extensions (Coby White and Reaves).

It’s just more than “move players XYZ for good player and hope the value makes sense”. I just think he will end up having to attach picks + possibly AB to move off all this stupid money he can’t access otherwise for 2+ seasons.

Like, you have to get rid of 4-5 overpriced scrubs this offseason if you want to be in conversations with these players the same offseason you sign Paolo to a max contract. They have to do this while getting bench players back that make sense.

You basically have to move KCP, Carter, Isaac, Cole, possibly Goga, decline and restructure Moe, and decline Gary if we are talking about adding more salary.


At least we have those mid sized contracts. In the length of the contract none of them is overpayed. Yes we will have to attach picks but that was the plan all along. If they were good enough we would not have to trade them in the first place.
Salaries become strict. Teams will have to move decent players for financial reasons. Its not as bad as it seems. Easier than moving Vuc, AG and Fournier in one deadline.


It was the plan to slightly overpay a few mid to low end production players and then attach positive assets to move them after the fact?

Are they overpaid based on the contract length? No. Unfortunately, Weltman has to move them sooner than later because he has to make the roster better NOW along with Paolo's max extension in mind. Sure, he can stay under the 2nd apron if he decides to not make upgrades... but that defeats the purpose of what he needs to do this very moment.

Orlando's draft picks are actually valuable now in both ways... They can save them money or land them a higher valued asset. Yeah, moving AG and Fournier for nothing after waiting around was somehow more difficult than moving a bunch of random role players nobody wants for positive assets. :lol:
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 35,259
And1: 13,570
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#44 » by basketballRob » Tue May 6, 2025 6:15 pm

Let's trade for Nembhard, Pritchard, and Reaves with Goga, Jett, and some draft picks.

Seriously, tho. They are all on great contracts, and I can't see them being moved.

Sent from my SM-G998U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Viper1500
Head Coach
Posts: 6,897
And1: 2,775
Joined: Apr 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
   

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#45 » by Viper1500 » Wed May 7, 2025 2:21 am

I actually like KCP, it’s unfortunate he makes 22m a year.
The Effect
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 4,854
And1: 2,107
Joined: Jul 09, 2004

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#46 » by The Effect » Wed May 7, 2025 3:50 pm

Orlando Dawg wrote:KCP could be part of a trade (filler) with the Lakers involving Banchero for Luka.
The Wagner/Banchero experiment is over. It’s like Shaq/Webber. Wagner needs an elite PG or Center.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Thanks man, needed that today :lol: :lol: :lol:
The Effect
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 4,854
And1: 2,107
Joined: Jul 09, 2004

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#47 » by The Effect » Wed May 7, 2025 3:52 pm

Viper1500 wrote:I actually like KCP, it’s unfortunate he makes 22m a year.

Say his contract was for 10m a year.........i still couldnt think of anything about him that i like as a player and would think of him as a negative asset
Anderson Hunt
Senior
Posts: 519
And1: 401
Joined: Jan 03, 2024

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#48 » by Anderson Hunt » Thu May 8, 2025 1:26 am

Pope, Isaac, and two firsts
for
Reaves, Knecht, Vanderbilt, and Vincent

PG - Suggs - Black - Vincent
SG - Reaves - Anthony -
C --- Carter - Wagner - Bitadze
PF - Banchero - Vanderbilt - da Silva
SF - Wagner - Knecht - Howard

You're welcome.
jonbob17
Analyst
Posts: 3,417
And1: 1,410
Joined: Jul 01, 2020

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#49 » by jonbob17 » Tue May 13, 2025 8:30 pm

I think the right answer to this question is the Orlando Magic
T-Cat
Starter
Posts: 2,301
And1: 511
Joined: May 04, 2004

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#50 » by T-Cat » Wed May 14, 2025 10:41 am

Anderson Hunt wrote:Pope, Isaac, and two firsts
for
Reaves, Knecht, Vanderbilt, and Vincent

PG - Suggs - Black - Vincent
SG - Reaves - Anthony -
C --- Carter - Wagner - Bitadze
PF - Banchero - Vanderbilt - da Silva
SF - Wagner - Knecht - Howard

You're welcome.


Dude! Suggs and Black aren't natural playmakers and Suggs health is something we shouldn't depend on moving forward!

Front office had questions about his and Jonathan Isaac health years ago.
T-Cat
Starter
Posts: 2,301
And1: 511
Joined: May 04, 2004

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#51 » by T-Cat » Wed May 14, 2025 10:43 am

Anderson Hunt wrote:Pope, Isaac, and two firsts
for
Reaves, Knecht, Vanderbilt, and Vincent

PG - Suggs - Black - Vincent
SG - Reaves - Anthony -
C --- Carter - Wagner - Bitadze
PF - Banchero - Vanderbilt - da Silva
SF - Wagner - Knecht - Howard

You're welcome.


Dude! Suggs and Black aren't natural playmakers and Suggs health is something we shouldn't depend on moving forward!

Front office had questions about his and Jonathan Isaac health years ago.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 17,938
And1: 8,198
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#52 » by Skybox » Wed May 14, 2025 10:59 am

Anderson Hunt wrote:Pope, Isaac, and two firsts
for
Reaves, Knecht, Vanderbilt, and Vincent

PG - Suggs - Black - Vincent
SG - Reaves - Anthony -
C --- Carter - Wagner - Bitadze
PF - Banchero - Vanderbilt - da Silva
SF - Wagner - Knecht - Howard

You're welcome.


Does that work with salary matching? I like it...not sure it really solves any problems for LAL. They probably want a C for their best trade chips. Great for ORL. Vanderbilt is an under the radar Isaac replacement as Isaac provided Zero offense this season. Tough to keep guys like that on the floor in the modern NBA...Vanderbilt isn't as impactful as Isaac defensively, but he's very good and can switch all over like Isaac. Reaves is the obvious target, but all 4 of those guys are appealing. Vanderbilt still has 3 more years, peaking at around $13m, which is obviously less than Isaac, but he really provides NO offense and doesn't even take enough 3's to demand defensive attention. Isaac, at least conceivably :lol: , COULD have a good shooting night. Vandy is like Fultz out on the perimeter. But I still like it overall.
Anderson Hunt
Senior
Posts: 519
And1: 401
Joined: Jan 03, 2024

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#53 » by Anderson Hunt » Wed May 14, 2025 4:26 pm

Skybox wrote:
Anderson Hunt wrote:Pope, Isaac, and two firsts
for
Reaves, Knecht, Vanderbilt, and Vincent

PG - Suggs - Black - Vincent
SG - Reaves - Anthony -
C --- Carter - Wagner - Bitadze
PF - Banchero - Vanderbilt - da Silva
SF - Wagner - Knecht - Howard

You're welcome.


Does that work with salary matching? I like it...not sure it really solves any problems for LAL. They probably want a C for their best trade chips. Great for ORL. Vanderbilt is an under the radar Isaac replacement as Isaac provided Zero offense this season. Tough to keep guys like that on the floor in the modern NBA...Vanderbilt isn't as impactful as Isaac defensively, but he's very good and can switch all over like Isaac. Reaves is the obvious target, but all 4 of those guys are appealing. Vanderbilt still has 3 more years, peaking at around $13m, which is obviously less than Isaac, but he really provides NO offense and doesn't even take enough 3's to demand defensive attention. Isaac, at least conceivably :lol: , COULD have a good shooting night. Vandy is like Fultz out on the perimeter. But I still like it overall.

The Lakers get the picks and on the floor they get a defensively versatile big in Isaac and a 3&D guard to balance out Doncic.
User avatar
SloNick Russia
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,942
And1: 526
Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
 

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#54 » by SloNick Russia » Thu May 15, 2025 5:16 am

Anderson Hunt wrote:
Skybox wrote:
Anderson Hunt wrote:Pope, Isaac, and two firsts
for
Reaves, Knecht, Vanderbilt, and Vincent

PG - Suggs - Black - Vincent
SG - Reaves - Anthony -
C --- Carter - Wagner - Bitadze
PF - Banchero - Vanderbilt - da Silva
SF - Wagner - Knecht - Howard

You're welcome.


Does that work with salary matching? I like it...not sure it really solves any problems for LAL. They probably want a C for their best trade chips. Great for ORL. Vanderbilt is an under the radar Isaac replacement as Isaac provided Zero offense this season. Tough to keep guys like that on the floor in the modern NBA...Vanderbilt isn't as impactful as Isaac defensively, but he's very good and can switch all over like Isaac. Reaves is the obvious target, but all 4 of those guys are appealing. Vanderbilt still has 3 more years, peaking at around $13m, which is obviously less than Isaac, but he really provides NO offense and doesn't even take enough 3's to demand defensive attention. Isaac, at least conceivably , COULD have a good shooting night. Vandy is like Fultz out on the perimeter. But I still like it overall.

The Lakers get the picks and on the floor they get a defensively versatile big in Isaac and a 3&D guard to balance out Doncic.
They don't have a C at all and Goga is healthy, available and is on a good contract.
Goga can play up to 30 mins, JI can't.
The true reason why LAL need to trade Reeves is because they can't afford to play him on defense with Luka and old Lebron, Wolves highlighed that well. They have the scoring, but could use a guy like KCP to balance the roster. The contract situation changed dramaticly in the NBA. Teams with cap space do not exist nowdays, there is no way Reeves gets 30M from anybody outside of his current orgainzation.
KCP is more valuble then we give him credit for. He gives you 30 quality veteran mins in the playoffs with good defense. Denver would love him over MPJ now days.

Sent from my SM-S928B using RealGM mobile app
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 17,938
And1: 8,198
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#55 » by Skybox » Thu May 15, 2025 9:35 am

SloNick Russia wrote:
Anderson Hunt wrote:
Skybox wrote:
Does that work with salary matching? I like it...not sure it really solves any problems for LAL. They probably want a C for their best trade chips. Great for ORL. Vanderbilt is an under the radar Isaac replacement as Isaac provided Zero offense this season. Tough to keep guys like that on the floor in the modern NBA...Vanderbilt isn't as impactful as Isaac defensively, but he's very good and can switch all over like Isaac. Reaves is the obvious target, but all 4 of those guys are appealing. Vanderbilt still has 3 more years, peaking at around $13m, which is obviously less than Isaac, but he really provides NO offense and doesn't even take enough 3's to demand defensive attention. Isaac, at least conceivably , COULD have a good shooting night. Vandy is like Fultz out on the perimeter. But I still like it overall.

The Lakers get the picks and on the floor they get a defensively versatile big in Isaac and a 3&D guard to balance out Doncic.
They don't have a C at all and Goga is healthy, available and is on a good contract.
Goga can play up to 30 mins, JI can't.
The true reason why LAL need to trade Reeves is because they can't afford to play him on defense with Luka and old Lebron, Wolves highlighed that well. They have the scoring, but could use a guy like KCP to balance the roster. The contract situation changed dramaticly in the NBA. Teams with cap space do not exist nowdays, there is no way Reeves gets 30M from anybody outside of his current orgainzation.
KCP is more valuble then we give him credit for. He gives you 30 quality veteran mins in the playoffs with good defense. Denver would love him over MPJ now days.

Sent from my SM-S928B using RealGM mobile app


I agree about KCP...I think he makes any team better for having him and I don't even think he's a negative value, though overpaid...it's just a matter of team construction & redundancy vs cap space. I could think of lots of teams that could have an interest...CLE sure could have used his toughness and he's definitely big enough to defend 3's if needed.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,203
And1: 13,523
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#56 » by JRoy » Thu May 15, 2025 11:49 pm

jonbob17 wrote:I think the right answer to this question is the Orlando Magic


That’s pretty funny.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,112
And1: 3,664
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#57 » by cedric76 » Fri May 16, 2025 7:13 am

Who wants KCP? A team that needs 3 points, Defense and Veteran leadership

This is why he ll stay in Orlando, we need those kind of players , and he only make 14% of the cap and 12.7% the following season if he opts in (bargain)
Suggs/Black/Joseph
Bane/Jett/Harris
F-Wagner/da Silva/Houstan
Banchero/Isaac/Moe
Carter/Goga/Raynaud
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,696
And1: 12,366
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#58 » by BadMofoPimp » Fri May 16, 2025 3:14 pm

T-Cat wrote:
Anderson Hunt wrote:Pope, Isaac, and two firsts
for
Reaves, Knecht, Vanderbilt, and Vincent

PG - Suggs - Black - Vincent
SG - Reaves - Anthony -
C --- Carter - Wagner - Bitadze
PF - Banchero - Vanderbilt - da Silva
SF - Wagner - Knecht - Howard

You're welcome.


Dude! Suggs and Black aren't natural playmakers and Suggs health is something we shouldn't depend on moving forward!

Front office had questions about his and Jonathan Isaac health years ago.


Franz and Paolo are playmakers just like Lebron is. Lakers rarely had play makers at the PG position.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Anderson Hunt
Senior
Posts: 519
And1: 401
Joined: Jan 03, 2024

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#59 » by Anderson Hunt » Fri May 16, 2025 3:17 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:
T-Cat wrote:
Anderson Hunt wrote:Pope, Isaac, and two firsts
for
Reaves, Knecht, Vanderbilt, and Vincent

PG - Suggs - Black - Vincent
SG - Reaves - Anthony -
C --- Carter - Wagner - Bitadze
PF - Banchero - Vanderbilt - da Silva
SF - Wagner - Knecht - Howard

You're welcome.


Dude! Suggs and Black aren't natural playmakers and Suggs health is something we shouldn't depend on moving forward!

Front office had questions about his and Jonathan Isaac health years ago.


Franz and Paolo are playmakers just like Lebron is. Lakers rarely had play makers at the PG position.

So is Reaves. T-Cat couldn't get past the PG label on Suggs and Black, not knowing I put them there to denote they are defensive PGs.
User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,018
And1: 9,173
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: Who wants KCP? 

Post#60 » by eyriq » Fri May 16, 2025 4:16 pm

Anderson Hunt wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
T-Cat wrote:
Dude! Suggs and Black aren't natural playmakers and Suggs health is something we shouldn't depend on moving forward!

Front office had questions about his and Jonathan Isaac health years ago.


Franz and Paolo are playmakers just like Lebron is. Lakers rarely had play makers at the PG position.

So is Reaves. T-Cat couldn't get past the PG label on Suggs and Black, not knowing I put them there to denote they are defensive PGs.


You have the correct labels, this board is absolutely obsessed with the positional debate though.

Return to Orlando Magic