Anti Chalmers wrote:Next year guys like Harris needs to go. If he can stay healthy, then he’s a solid vet to have but dude gets random injuries and out for weeks.
next year? too late for me....i'm thinking more this deadline
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
Anti Chalmers wrote:Next year guys like Harris needs to go. If he can stay healthy, then he’s a solid vet to have but dude gets random injuries and out for weeks.

KillMonger wrote:Anti Chalmers wrote:Next year guys like Harris needs to go. If he can stay healthy, then he’s a solid vet to have but dude gets random injuries and out for weeks.
next year? too late for me....i'm thinking more this deadline
Shaqdaz wrote:I've been watching the defense on the Sixers side out that resulted in the 5 seconds on repeat. It was an absolute thing of beauty. And what stood out to me was the way Orlando adapted - this was the exact same play they ran for Maxey at around the 2:00 mark, which ended on a wide open 3 because of miscommunication between Paolo and Queen.
Paolo switches the back pick onto Maxey; Cole switches the Gordon pick; Isaac switches the last screen and ends up denying Maxey the ball. Great stuff.
I've actually been quite impressed with Coles effort and overall effectiveness on defense the past few games...even against Milwawkee and Dame. I don't have any data to back up the eye test, but the times he does get scored on I feel are when the initial defender doesn't fight over the screen (PG got a 3 late because of this tonight)...and it looks as though Orlando is happy to give up this switch. I'm not sure if it's a general rule to switch these late in games, as it's typically a great defender switching onto the ball (or is when everyones healthy), but for 3 and a half quarters of the game, the Orlando defenders fight over the top and avoid the switch.
Another great win. I can't wait for when everyone's healthy
pepe1991 wrote:As it looks right now, OKC will have lottery pick this year for sure.
76ers are just disaster.
Without Embiid they are both top 8 worst offense and defense and on pace to win 27 games. Not that they are elite with him,but without him they are Nets level bad.
76ers are easly the worst nba team that isn't intentionally bad. Hell, Bulls want to suck but still are better.
Might as well fold. They keep pick with 1-6 selection. Without Embiid, Nets & Blazers will probably surpass them anyway.
From Magic POV, any W given injuries is good W. I'm looking forward Bucks game.
Rainwater wrote:Shaqdaz wrote:I've been watching the defense on the Sixers side out that resulted in the 5 seconds on repeat. It was an absolute thing of beauty. And what stood out to me was the way Orlando adapted - this was the exact same play they ran for Maxey at around the 2:00 mark, which ended on a wide open 3 because of miscommunication between Paolo and Queen.
Paolo switches the back pick onto Maxey; Cole switches the Gordon pick; Isaac switches the last screen and ends up denying Maxey the ball. Great stuff.
I've actually been quite impressed with Coles effort and overall effectiveness on defense the past few games...even against Milwawkee and Dame. I don't have any data to back up the eye test, but the times he does get scored on I feel are when the initial defender doesn't fight over the screen (PG got a 3 late because of this tonight)...and it looks as though Orlando is happy to give up this switch. I'm not sure if it's a general rule to switch these late in games, as it's typically a great defender switching onto the ball (or is when everyones healthy), but for 3 and a half quarters of the game, the Orlando defenders fight over the top and avoid the switch.
Another great win. I can't wait for when everyone's healthy
I mentioned this during the game, that rotation on defense that led to the 5 seconds was a thing of beauty. Cole's D has been good as well.
Optimus_Steel wrote:Rainwater wrote:Shaqdaz wrote:I've been watching the defense on the Sixers side out that resulted in the 5 seconds on repeat. It was an absolute thing of beauty. And what stood out to me was the way Orlando adapted - this was the exact same play they ran for Maxey at around the 2:00 mark, which ended on a wide open 3 because of miscommunication between Paolo and Queen.
Paolo switches the back pick onto Maxey; Cole switches the Gordon pick; Isaac switches the last screen and ends up denying Maxey the ball. Great stuff.
I've actually been quite impressed with Coles effort and overall effectiveness on defense the past few games...even against Milwawkee and Dame. I don't have any data to back up the eye test, but the times he does get scored on I feel are when the initial defender doesn't fight over the screen (PG got a 3 late because of this tonight)...and it looks as though Orlando is happy to give up this switch. I'm not sure if it's a general rule to switch these late in games, as it's typically a great defender switching onto the ball (or is when everyones healthy), but for 3 and a half quarters of the game, the Orlando defenders fight over the top and avoid the switch.
Another great win. I can't wait for when everyone's healthy
I mentioned this during the game, that rotation on defense that led to the 5 seconds was a thing of beauty. Cole's D has been good as well.
That defensive stop was a thing of beauty. And it shows they can learn and adapt quickly from the Maxey 3 moments before.

Bergmaniac wrote:Any win this short-handed is a good win, but it's still frustrating how many games in which we outplay the opponents in most aspects handily are close or lost due to poor shooting. The only reason this one was close was because we shot so much worse from 3 than the Sixers and the FT line despite almost all of our 3s being wide open and the Sixers taking a lot of tough ones. We were crushing them on the glass, we were getting good looks inside and from 3, but the poor shooting made everything harder than it had to be.
SOUL wrote:Bergmaniac wrote:Any win this short-handed is a good win, but it's still frustrating how many games in which we outplay the opponents in most aspects handily are close or lost due to poor shooting. The only reason this one was close was because we shot so much worse from 3 than the Sixers and the FT line despite almost all of our 3s being wide open and the Sixers taking a lot of tough ones. We were crushing them on the glass, we were getting good looks inside and from 3, but the poor shooting made everything harder than it had to be.
Think of it this way, if we had consistent good shooting and consistent top 3 defense while being insanely short-handed most games... we would be a contender this year and win 5 chips in a row lol.
I wanna see how our offense is when we have most of our guys back. Shooting wasn't great early season but when we had most of our guys healthy (outside of Paolo in game 5/Franz sickness), we scored 109 points or more in every game but the Bulls one. Feel like with some more good shooting games, it can get to around 110-115 even if our defense lets up a little bit some games. Don't think we will ever have elite offense while playing our defensive style, but just being more efficient some games will really help.
pepe1991 wrote:As it looks right now, OKC will have lottery pick this year for sure.
76ers are just disaster.
Without Embiid they are both top 8 worst offense and defense and on pace to win 27 games. Not that they are elite with him,but without him they are Nets level bad.
76ers are easly the worst nba team that isn't intentionally bad. Hell, Bulls want to suck but still are better.
Might as well fold. They keep pick with 1-6 selection. Without Embiid, Nets & Blazers will probably surpass them anyway.
From Magic POV, any W given injuries is good W. I'm looking forward Bucks game.
Bergmaniac wrote:It's great that we pulled this one off despite all the injuries and it's nice to see Isaac being crucial on offense after struggling so badly on that end all year. Cole also played very well, not just his hot shooting early on, but he played solid D apart from the two dumb fouls when they were in the bonus and didn't try to be the hero in the clutch, instead made a good assist to Paolo.
Wathing Paul George this season makes me glad we didn't gave him a max contract, yes, he is still capable of getting hot, but he can't get by defenders anymore and has to resort to taking tough shots almost exclusively. He'll have good shooting nights and he is still a very good defender, but he is not worth 50 mln. per year, and it will only get worse from here on.
Any win this short-handed is a good win, but it's still frustrating how many games in which we outplay the opponents in most aspects handily are close or lost due to poor shooting. The only reason this one was close was because we shot so much worse from 3 than the Sixers and the FT line despite almost all of our 3s being wide open and the Sixers taking a lot of tough ones. We were crushing them on the glass, we were getting good looks inside and from 3, but the poor shooting made everything harder than it had to be.



BadMofoPimp wrote:Reached for a 2nd round talent in Nicholson.
BadMofoPimp wrote:
With shoes on?
doct3r dr3 wrote:Just very proud of this team.