Idunkonyou2 wrote:dsg2021 wrote:
Why would they have a stretch / cut rule for only new contracts, but then make the same exact thing with the renegotiate and extend rule for new contracts only again? I know one cuts but it's still odd. I think its a rule for old contracts and I want 100% confirm before I say, "ok, lakers need amnesty kobe for cap space or do some downright crazy trades/make dwight sign for way less than he should." These are two separate things, the stretch/cut and reneg/extend. Orlando and the rest of the league probably liked it but forgot to see it was a huge B list item for the Lakers at this moment to get 10mil cap space off Kobe's contract.
Players can't just opt out of their current contract when said contract has no opt out option. They could add a new extension to Kobe's deal, but they can't change his existing deal just for the hell of it.
There's a new rule in the new CBA that allows up to a max 40% drop in contract value for a contract to be renegotiated for less and then extended further. This is fact. The only disputable notion is whether it applies to new contracts moving forward like the Stretch and Cut, of if its applicable to all contracts now.
I keep saying this over and over. It's down to like 2-4 teams here. No teams going to offer a lot like what happened with CP3. It's going to come down to LAL if Otis still has a Bynum deal without Gasol on the top of the list, then NJ, BOS, DAL, LAC if any of them take Dwight without extension or Dwight would extend with one of them instead of LAL.