VGOSWAMI wrote:Sure, he'd get 18 and 9 but for the money he's being paid? I'd be hard pressed to find a team willing to take his contract. Every year from now his production is going to decline. It may be a decent basketball move in the short-term, but long term it could lead to cap hell and declined production. I view Boozer in the same light as Joe Johnson and Amare Stoudemire. Good players, but not worth the dollar they get.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think he's worth the money and wouldn't want him on our team either. He definitely fits the overpaid category. But I still think there are crappy/desperate teams that would consider him, especially if their plan A or B trades fall through. Turkoglu has no value at all. Boozer still has value, even if he's overpaid. His contract is only for 3 more years. I can see him putting up 18/9 on developing teams for at least 2 of those years and he can easily be traded in the final year.
Look at Joe Johnson... he's getting paid significantly more and longer than Boozer and he didn't even average great numbers the season before he signed his max deal (came off a terrible playoff performance, too). The Hawks made a deal everybody knew was horrible, but they still made it because they were desperate to secure a b-level player. I would not be surprised if a crappy team traded for Boozer.
I'm not sure this rumor about trading Noah has any legs anyway. NY Daily put a single line about it on the second page of an article about Pat Riley and the Heat. No mention of a source, no link to another site... just seems like speculation generated from water cooler talk from a month ago -
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/05/14/ ... noah-deng/ .