GimmeDat wrote:I'd have him at or near the top of the list if he was healthy, as he was a year or two ago. But his situation is feels like more of a flier at this point. I wonder what the Magic FO truly feel about him right now.
The contract they gave him and the time they've invested into his rehab suggests to me that they see him as a lot more than just a player they'd give away as a flier. Whether they should or not, is another question I suppose.
On one end, at full health, he's a potential top 40 guy in terms of the impact he can bring to a team. On the other, he's someone who has played in less than 40% of his career NBA games and continues to rehab for going on 18 months from a major knee injury. It's tough to say where that places his value on the trade market.
I'd say it's still higher than what the Bulls would more than likely be willing to give up. I'm not the biggest Pat will fan (even despite his college roots) but I can see why they would hesitate to make that trade given Isaac's injury history.
However, I'd say the bidding war for Grant might get significantly pricer, which is something to consider. Of the names you mentioned, Isaac does fit in that middle category of having to pay up more than you would for a Clarke/Boucher (who I'm not all that high on to begin with) but below what Grant would cost you.
I don't see a team like Sac who's desperate for the play-in moving Barnes. Turner isn't a 4 to me. Grant's the perfect fit but I think there will be higher bidders.