p0peye wrote:When was the last time a team won the title without having All-NBA player on its roster?
By the time the Magic win a ship, either Franz or Paolo will become one.
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
p0peye wrote:When was the last time a team won the title without having All-NBA player on its roster?


eyriq wrote:?t=7Kj9naSxqoQB7SGNUkPazw&s=19

pepe1991 wrote:eyriq wrote:?t=7Kj9naSxqoQB7SGNUkPazw&s=19
Non of his very long list of injuries occured because of contact with other players. We are all concerned because his body has nasty habbit of collapsing and putting more pressure on already shaky knees and ankles sounds like very dumb idea. Because it normally is- very dumb idea.
VFX wrote:I think what others are saying is that in order for Orlando to be in true contention, that their asset pool of talent needs to become more than what they have shown to an exponential degree relative to their draft position.
Not only in terms of contribution on the court, but in terms of asset value for potential trades down the road.
Orlando has spent a lot of draft capital to build this roster. Paolo, Franz, Suggs have met or exceeded expectations at this point. AB and Jett will need to at the very least meet expectations in order for Orlando to start being considered contenders IF the bar being set is the current Boston Celtics roster.
I’d agree also that one of Paolo or Franz MUST be considered an all nba talent as well.


drsd wrote:ESPN predicts a 43 win season, and if "Paolo Banchero takes the next step", then 45 wins.
What a joke. Reasonably assuming F-Wagner and Banchero will be more efficient on offense, that the Magic will take and make more threes, and still continue to be an elite defensive team, all simple predictions, this team wins more than 45 games.
And let's go to extremes, I think this roster is more likely to win 60 games than 40 (or less). (of course they won't but it emphasizes my point).
Orlando is now better than mediocre. Will the team contend this year? No. But it will compete every night.
Here's my bold prediction: Orlando will lose by 10 (or more) in less than 10 games.
For perspective, last year the Magic lost 19 games by 10-or more. And the Celts lost 5 such games.
"Never" being blown out will show real growth for this roster. That's what I see as a goal this season.
Knightro wrote:drsd wrote:ESPN predicts a 43 win season, and if "Paolo Banchero takes the next step", then 45 wins.
What a joke. Reasonably assuming F-Wagner and Banchero will be more efficient on offense, that the Magic will take and make more threes, and still continue to be an elite defensive team, all simple predictions, this team wins more than 45 games.
And let's go to extremes, I think this roster is more likely to win 60 games than 40 (or less). (of course they won't but it emphasizes my point).
Orlando is now better than mediocre. Will the team contend this year? No. But it will compete every night.
Here's my bold prediction: Orlando will lose by 10 (or more) in less than 10 games.
For perspective, last year the Magic lost 19 games by 10-or more. And the Celts lost 5 such games.
"Never" being blown out will show real growth for this roster. That's what I see as a goal this season.
40 wins is WAY more likely than 60, man. C’mon now.
SHAQ32 wrote:They're still trying to sell 58-game, 16-mpg Isaac, smh
drsd wrote:Knightro wrote:drsd wrote:ESPN predicts a 43 win season, and if "Paolo Banchero takes the next step", then 45 wins.
What a joke. Reasonably assuming F-Wagner and Banchero will be more efficient on offense, that the Magic will take and make more threes, and still continue to be an elite defensive team, all simple predictions, this team wins more than 45 games.
And let's go to extremes, I think this roster is more likely to win 60 games than 40 (or less). (of course they won't but it emphasizes my point).
Orlando is now better than mediocre. Will the team contend this year? No. But it will compete every night.
Here's my bold prediction: Orlando will lose by 10 (or more) in less than 10 games.
For perspective, last year the Magic lost 19 games by 10-or more. And the Celts lost 5 such games.
"Never" being blown out will show real growth for this roster. That's what I see as a goal this season.
40 wins is WAY more likely than 60, man. C’mon now.
I agree. But UNDER 40 is less likely than MORE than 50.
Restated: a 50 win season would not surprise me.
Go MAGIC!
p.s. my not-money is currently on 49 wins. Let's see how the preseason games go to modify that view of mine.
..

p0peye wrote:I'd be surprised if we have less than 42 or more then 48 wins.
RichCollab wrote:p0peye wrote:I'd be surprised if we have less than 42 or more then 48 wins.
I will take the over on 48 wins.
p0peye wrote:RichCollab wrote:p0peye wrote:I'd be surprised if we have less than 42 or more then 48 wins.
I will take the over on 48 wins.
Sounds good, willing to bet 50 USD (EUR) Amazon eGift card for fun.
RichCollab wrote:p0peye wrote:RichCollab wrote:
I will take the over on 48 wins.
Sounds good, willing to bet 50 USD (EUR) Amazon eGift card for fun.
Absolutely.
RichCollab wrote:p0peye wrote:RichCollab wrote:
I will take the over on 48 wins.
Sounds good, willing to bet 50 USD (EUR) Amazon eGift card for fun.
Absolutely.
p0peye wrote:RichCollab wrote:p0peye wrote:
Sounds good, willing to bet 50 USD (EUR) Amazon eGift card for fun.
Absolutely.
It's pretty much a sure thing I am winning this bet two weeks into the season. I will let you off the hook because it's Paolo's injury that is deciding factor so early.
p0peye wrote:p0peye wrote:RichCollab wrote:
Absolutely.
It's pretty much a sure thing I am winning this bet two weeks into the season. I will let you off the hook because it's Paolo's injury that is deciding factor so early.
If you still think you have a chance, we can keep the bet, I am not avoiding it.