BadMofoPimp wrote:Thunder got lucky to draft (3) great players. Don't worry, their luck won't last long as soon as these guys are either in the last year of their contract or are about to become unrestricted free agents. All (3) will all bolt. Trust me on that one.
Eh lucky? Those were very methodical and well-scouted picks. Troy Weaver had Durant on his radar since he was a high school player. Westbrook was projected to go 9th and they took a chance on him at 3. Ibaka was the 24th pick. Maynor was picked at 20th. Not to mention Jeff Green at 5. They did their homework and got 6 exceptionally good players via the draft. With so many team screwing up their picks, I find it hard to think that they simply got lucky 6 times.
I can't predict the future and say that all 3 will leave, but at the very least, their management has done their part in putting a winning product on the floor that their fans will support. KD and Westbrook are locked in for the next 4-5 years. It's a lot of time for OKC to screw it up, but Presti has proven to be a smart guy. If they lose one of Harden or Ibaka next offseason, I don't think it'll be because the NBA has predetermined their destination, but more so that the cap is lowered and makes it harder for them to retain 4 guys on close to max deals. FWIW the one place outside of OKC that Harden expressed interest in going to was the Phoenix Suns, another small market. Recently he said the he was "pretty sure" he'd re-sign with OKC.
Got to give OKC for putting their team in good position. Sorry for digressing on this. I just admire what OKC has done and I hope we can build something like they have.
BadMofoPimp wrote:As for the Spurs, I think they have a great coach and system that was taylored for Duncan. As far as their other players, Ginobili and Parker, they are just great role players. Duncan is the only Superstar there and he almost left once, but he is a nice low key guy that doesn't want the fame and fortune. A rare find right there. The issue why Parker or Ginobili never left is because neither got max contracts and no team offered more than what the Spurs could pay. Thus, they were able to keep their team.
Is there anything wrong with that? They've been able to make it work with the greatest power forward of all time and Ginobili, a 2x All-Star, and Parker, a 4x All-Star. And they've always made sure to surround those guys with players with grit and toughness. People who know their roles and adhere to them. They've always still been able to turn trash into treasure. They took Boris Diaw off the worst team in the league and turned him into a valuable part of their starting lineup. They took Stephen Jackson, who was buried on the bench in Milwaukee, and used him as a vital part of their team.
RC Buford and Popavich have been playing the right cards for years and it has paid off. It's just the way that small market teams are going to have to conduct themselves. The character of their players weigh significantly and their selflessness prevents the team from having to deal with a Dwightmare. We're going to have to adopt these attributes going forward. Finding gems in the rough like the Spurs do is the most cost-effective way to build.
As for Duncan being timid and low-key. I think Durant and D. Rose are two other guys who exude the same behavior. Not all guys are like that. But that's something that teams have to pick thru and understand what each player's goals and motivations are. If their heart is in basketball and being a champion, then they'll go where they have the best chance to be that.
BadMofoPimp wrote:As far as the Knicks are concerned, they had the first ever $100 million payroll because of Isaiah Thomas doled out to sub-par players like Curry and Sprewell to which crippled any chance they had at making trades or improving the team via trade. Knicks just had poor management decisions.
Wouldn't it help the NBA to have the Knicks relevant and going deep into the playoffs? This is kind of my point. It doesn't matter whether you're a small market or a big market. It's about what the guys calling shots do.
BadMofoPimp wrote:But, after what the Magic went through losing Shaq to LA and understanding the backlash of considering doing business with LA, the Magic still went ahead and basically traded Dwight for nothing or garbage or whatever you want to call it.
For what is being called the worst trade in NBA history on sporting websites to happen even though the Magic had already been swindled out of Shaq by LA, the NBA has to be rigged.
Obviously, the Magic had to get concessions for alienating almost their entire fanbase and ruining any semblance of ever fielding a championship contender within the next decade. Imagine all the money Devos is going to lose because of this trade from lost fans, lost attendence, lost sponsorships and lost Television contracts. NBA is taking care of Devos for lost money, trust me. Because, LA, Adidas and Stern are sliding some of that money back at Devos. This is the only rationale I could see Devos ever considering a trade that cripples his Franchise possibly forever.
Perhaps Stern shouldn't be blamed for the Magic accepting such a bad deal and dealing Dwight to LA. I think that should fall on Hennigan, Martins, and DeVos. Wouldn't be the first time the Magic front office made a horrible, franchise-crippling move. For the record, I don't like the trade, but I also wouldn't doubt if it was the best deal available.
Guys like Melo, CP3, and D12 are divas. No questioning that. But I don't really have a problem with them snubbing small markets for big markets. It's a business and they have to do what's best for themselves. You can call that selfish, but we do it almost everyday. It's just not on TV. We have to be able to pick the right guys with high character and a team-first mentality and then build a sustainable, quality team around the star players that we do get.
The league is made up of haves and have-nots. Small market teams will always be at a disadvantage, but it's up to those teams to play a different game in building their teams. The principles are different. We have to be cost-effective, efficient, calculated, and we can't waste the superstars that we do get. Tough to keep the best center in the world when you're only contenders for 1.5 years out of 8 of his career. Management has to come thru. Winning may not keep a superstar player, but it makes it harder for them to leave.