pepe1991 wrote:tiderulz wrote:pepe1991 wrote:
Good, nice trade value.
I really see zero reasons why team should draft and keep player this year.
it obviously depends who is drafted/available. ludicrous to make a statement like this
With Isaaac, Fultz ,Bamba Frazier and Iwundu still there it's simply pointless to bring so many players with no experience.
Especially if Vuc and Ross are returning, only way to improve roster is with trades, and that pick is nice asset to have.
But even if you lose them , what position you even want to draft?
You have Fultz at PG and maybe returning Birch. And ofc DJ.
Team has zero need for SG with Ross and Evan.
Taking SF/PF will result cut in PT for Gordon or Isaac or both.
Backup PF position now is being used to boost PT players mentioned above.
C position is overcrowded.
Now, if Vuc and Ross leave ( i highly doubt they will ) , it's different story as team is back at tanking roots, than drafting SG-SF makes some sense.
But even if you are at square one, at rebuild, having too many young players isn't helpful for their development at all. Magic whole year long couldn't even find 5 mpg for Frazier ,35th pick and it took Bamba's injury to bring Birch back in rotation .
So if you lose Vuc, you are briging back Birch, if you lose Ross, you would assume Iwundu, Frazier and Fultz will fill his PT.
There is simply limited PT to offer to players , it happed to Kings, Suns, Magic in past, you can't play all players, especially trying to develop so many young guys at once, it's complete mess.
Toronto, the team Weltman is from, is a team that has demonstrated how to continue using the draft to stockpile talent and depth that can either contribute straight away, or will within a few seasons. Over the last 3 seasons, their picks have been:
Siakam - averaged 15pmg over 50 games as a rookie. Presently their starting forward.
Poeltl - averaged 11mpg over 50 games as a rookie, 18mpg over 80 games the following season, then traded in a package with DeRozan for Kawhi and Green.
Van Vleet - averaged 7mpg over 20 games as a rookie, 20mpg the following season, and is presently averaging the 5th highest minutes per game in Toronto.
Anunoby - averaged 20mpg since he was a rookie.
Utah - Mitchell has been a starter and a star for the Jazz since his rookie season. He was the 13th pick. Royce O'Neal has averaged 15mpg as a rookie and now 20mpg this season.
Milwaukee - Malcolm Brogdon averaged 26mpg as Milwaukee's 6th man during his rookie year (and won ROTY). He's presently their starting SG, on the best team in the league, just 2 seasons later.
Denver Nuggets - all but 5 players on their roster have been drafted in the past 4 seasons.
76ers - Shamet, Korkmaz and Bolden are all rookies and have seen substantial minutes this season.
Thunder - Ferguson, Nader, Diallo - a sophomore 6th man, and two rookies finding 10mpg over 50+ games.
Spurs - Murray, slated to become their starting PG until injuries took him down. Forbes and White averaging over 25mpg this season as a 3rd year and sophomore, respectively. Last season, Forbes averaged 19mpg over 80 games and White hardly got on the court.
Just because a player doesn't play as a rookie, doesn't mean there can't be a path for them to become key contributors down the line.
Just because they don't play, doesn't mean they're not good, or won't be good in the future.
Just because a player is not good now, doesn't mean they can't become good in the future.
I mean, how much shade have you thrown at Fultz since we acquired him, and now you're worried about protecting his minutes? Same with Bamba, you say he's not ready and that he should be brought along slowly - so why can't another rookie be treated similarly?
You say you'd rather trade the pick for a player whom you know what he'll give you - but you've already outlined how there's no room for a rookie, so how do you make room or minutes for this other acquisition? Hmmm... I see a flaw in your hot take.





























