Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV, Mods Close)
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
-
Deezy
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,930
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jan 19, 2004
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
Yeah, but in Baby's defense, his high USG% is a direct correlation of playing with Doo-hon. Not that he doesn't possess the trigger happy syndrome at times, but I'm sure it gets stimulated more-so when he's in the game with the bench unit seeing how he always gets the ball with the shot clock dwindling down.

Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
- trebone
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,720
- And1: 368
- Joined: Jun 26, 2006
- Location: Fl
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
eyriq wrote:Blue_and_Whte wrote:eyriq wrote:Brockman gets paid 1/6 of what BBD gets paid, puts up better rebounding numbers, and doesn't think he is Kevin Garnett. Advantage Brockman.
unbelieveable. Are we trying to lose in the first round of the PO's?
Wait wait wait, are you implying that switching out BBD for Brockman loses the first round? Perhaps this is news to you but BBD sucks. Bad. Brockman is a far superior offensive rebounder and wouldn't use 22% of our offensive possessions when he's in the game. HUGE net positive right there.
What this guy said
Anything to get rid of BBD and Duhon is an addition by subtraction IMO
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
-
SmiteaDwight
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,425
- And1: 14
- Joined: May 31, 2010
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
eyriq wrote:Blue_and_Whte wrote:eyriq wrote:Brockman gets paid 1/6 of what BBD gets paid, puts up better rebounding numbers, and doesn't think he is Kevin Garnett. Advantage Brockman.
unbelieveable. Are we trying to lose in the first round of the PO's?
Wait wait wait, are you implying that switching out BBD for Brockman loses the first round? Perhaps this is news to you but BBD sucks. Bad. Brockman is a far superior offensive rebounder and wouldn't use 22% of our offensive possessions when he's in the game. HUGE net positive right there.
agree with this.
Brockman> BBD
however, Bass> BBD
at least Bass has hops and can finish
Re: Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline c
-
Driguez
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,825
- And1: 2,107
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
- Location: Impartial
-
Re: Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline c
Orlando Prodigy wrote:I don't think you guys understand...Redick can't be traded...
...because this guy would be upset.
http://www.nba.com/magic/photogallery/f ... 912_1.html
Huevos Bancheros
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
-
MagicFan32
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,953
- And1: 790
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
That post about Otis and Hedo was gold, it illustrates why Otis is such a TERRIBLE GM
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
- Blue_and_Whte
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,687
- And1: 9,569
- Joined: Jun 26, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL.
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
And you think it increases our chances of getting past it? Brockman wouldn't use 22% of our offensive possessions because he provides zero offense...Huge net positive from the damn bench.eyriq wrote:Blue_and_Whte wrote:eyriq wrote:Brockman gets paid 1/6 of what BBD gets paid, puts up better rebounding numbers, and doesn't think he is Kevin Garnett. Advantage Brockman.
unbelieveable. Are we trying to lose in the first round of the PO's?
Wait wait wait, are you implying that switching out BBD for Brockman loses the first round? Perhaps this is news to you but BBD sucks. Bad. Brockman is a far superior offensive rebounder and wouldn't use 22% of our offensive possessions when he's in the game. HUGE net positive right there.
No, I dont think downgrading is the answer. I thought the end goal was to get better in addition to convincing Dwight to stay. Dont think moving a guy that he requested, and who's had some big games in the PO's in case you've forgotten already is the way to do that. I dont believe it, our bench cant score as it is and you want to move Baby for Brockman? come on man. Jon Brockman...smh Big Baby Davis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon Brockman i nevery aspect of life.
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
Re: Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline c
-
Driguez
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,825
- And1: 2,107
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
- Location: Impartial
-
Re: Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline c
CourtsideTV wrote:barea would be a good pickup seeing there is a huge PR community..they'll still come to see magic games in case dwight leaves.
Yes we will come, along with this (Barea's wifey)


Huevos Bancheros
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
-
BN
- Starter
- Posts: 2,255
- And1: 28
- Joined: Jun 27, 2004
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
Sweet Jesus, get that man over here now!
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
- Blue_and_Whte
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,687
- And1: 9,569
- Joined: Jun 26, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL.
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
SmiteaDwight wrote:agree with this.
Brockman> BBD
however, Bass> BBD
at least Bass has hops and can finish
wtf?
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
Re: Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline c
- ADRajX
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,733
- And1: 97
- Joined: Aug 15, 2004
-
Re: Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline c
Driguez wrote:CourtsideTV wrote:barea would be a good pickup seeing there is a huge PR community..they'll still come to see magic games in case dwight leaves.
Yes we will come, along with this (Barea's wifey)
“Life is a series of natural and spontaneous changes. Don't resist them; that only creates sorrow. Let reality be reality. Let things flow naturally forward in whatever way they like.” - Laozi
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
- eyriq
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 34,350
- And1: 9,746
- Joined: Mar 25, 2008
- Location: #TheLab
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
Blue_and_Whte wrote:And you think it increases our chances of getting past it? Brockman wouldn't use 22% of our offensive possessions because he provides zero offense...Huge net positive from the damn bench.
No, I dont think downgrading is the answer. I thought the end goal was to get better in addition to convincing Dwight to stay. Dont think moving a guy that he requested, and who's had some big games in the PO's in case you've forgotten already is the way to do that. I dont believe it, our bench cant score as it is and you want to move Baby for Brockman? come on man. Jon Brockman...smh Big Baby Davis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon Brockman i nevery aspect of life.
"In nearly every aspect of life" except basketball. He is an upgrade over BBD as an energy big, he gets paid $1,000,000 to Baby's $6,000,000, and he is much less likely to hurt the offense. In fact, his offensive rebounding would help out greatly, that is exactly the skill set we need in a back up 4/5. This is all for the sake of argument, I don't have insider and I don't know the full parameters of the Hollinger trade proposal. But both long-term and short-term I'm taking Brockman over BBD right now and not losing any sleep.
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
- Blue_and_Whte
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,687
- And1: 9,569
- Joined: Jun 26, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL.
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
eyriq wrote:Blue_and_Whte wrote:And you think it increases our chances of getting past it? Brockman wouldn't use 22% of our offensive possessions because he provides zero offense...Huge net positive from the damn bench.
No, I dont think downgrading is the answer. I thought the end goal was to get better in addition to convincing Dwight to stay. Dont think moving a guy that he requested, and who's had some big games in the PO's in case you've forgotten already is the way to do that. I dont believe it, our bench cant score as it is and you want to move Baby for Brockman? come on man. Jon Brockman...smh Big Baby Davis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon Brockman i nevery aspect of life.
"In nearly every aspect of life" except basketball. He is an upgrade over BBD as an energy big, he gets paid $1,000,000 to Baby's $6,000,000, and he is much less likely to hurt the offense. In fact, his offensive rebounding would help out greatly, that is exactly the skill set we need in a back up 4/5. This is all for the sake of argument, I don't have insider and I don't know the full parameters of the Hollinger trade proposal. But both long-term and short-term I'm taking Brockman over BBD right now and not losing any sleep.
You're serious.
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
-
SmiteaDwight
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,425
- And1: 14
- Joined: May 31, 2010
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
Blue_and_Whte wrote:eyriq wrote:Blue_and_Whte wrote:And you think it increases our chances of getting past it? Brockman wouldn't use 22% of our offensive possessions because he provides zero offense...Huge net positive from the damn bench.
No, I dont think downgrading is the answer. I thought the end goal was to get better in addition to convincing Dwight to stay. Dont think moving a guy that he requested, and who's had some big games in the PO's in case you've forgotten already is the way to do that. I dont believe it, our bench cant score as it is and you want to move Baby for Brockman? come on man. Jon Brockman...smh Big Baby Davis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon Brockman i nevery aspect of life.
"In nearly every aspect of life" except basketball. He is an upgrade over BBD as an energy big, he gets paid $1,000,000 to Baby's $6,000,000, and he is much less likely to hurt the offense. In fact, his offensive rebounding would help out greatly, that is exactly the skill set we need in a back up 4/5. This is all for the sake of argument, I don't have insider and I don't know the full parameters of the Hollinger trade proposal. But both long-term and short-term I'm taking Brockman over BBD right now and not losing any sleep.
You're serious.
why are you so high on a pf who's only shooting 37% this year?
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
-
Mrrags009
- Junior
- Posts: 293
- And1: 34
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
whatver happened to the dwight to gs for curry/lee/thompson rumor .... can we please just hurry up with the eventual 7th seeded orland magic gosh
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
-
bonanz
- Junior
- Posts: 287
- And1: 34
- Joined: Jun 17, 2010
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
lol hedo suspended for 1 game


Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.)
- JarethCutestory
- Senior
- Posts: 580
- And1: 34
- Joined: Jan 08, 2009
Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.)
Hedo for Blatche and Nick Young book it I guarantee it toss it in the oven and let it bake all night long WE GOT BLATCHE fellas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline c
-
Driguez
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,825
- And1: 2,107
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
- Location: Impartial
-
Re: Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline c
JarethCutestory wrote:Hedo for Blatche and Nick Young book it I guarantee it toss it in the oven and let it bake all night long WE GOT BLATCHE fellas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What number of guarantee trades is this one? I lost count
Huevos Bancheros
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
- MoMM
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,597
- And1: 1,781
- Joined: Jan 08, 2002
- Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
I dont believe people are discussing who is the best one: Brockman or BBD.
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
- Blue_and_Whte
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,687
- And1: 9,569
- Joined: Jun 26, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL.
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
SmiteaDwight wrote:why are you so high on a pf who's only shooting 37% this year?
Compared to brockmans 27%?.... gee I have no idea....and why does everyone blow everything i say out of proportion? Me "I think Beasley would really help this team offensively" response: "Why does everyone think Michael Beasley is our savior"
I'm not high on either of those guys why does everyone pretend Brockman is some super offensive rebounding machine? He avgs 1 per game. I can understand people overrating him since we played them a bunch of times this year if he had good games. but he didn't..He sucked.
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
- Blue_and_Whte
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,687
- And1: 9,569
- Joined: Jun 26, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL.
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread (Pt XV: Trade Deadline cont.
MoMM wrote:I dont believe people are discussing who is the best one: Brockman or BBD.
right, they both suck... I'll take Davis's potential in the po's and his defense over Brockmans energy any day.
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA








