ImageImageImageImage

Suggs’ extension

Moderators: Howard Mass, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, UCF, Knightro, ChosenSavior

User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,924
And1: 7,221
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#81 » by eyriq » Mon Jan 29, 2024 9:45 pm

Skin wrote:Suggs is gonna get $20M+.

Franz is gonna get $40M+

Paolo is gonna get $50M+

Cole's extension was such a blunder.
Reality hits hard, man. 40% of rotations turn over every season, on average. The team being built around Suggs, Franz, and Paolo is going to look very different than it does today.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 29,999
And1: 12,013
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#82 » by basketballRob » Mon Jan 29, 2024 9:55 pm

The-Stallion70 wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
The-Stallion70 wrote:If Suggs gets a nine figure deal then Weltman should immediately be fired.


5yr/100m with team option on the last year? Im down.


McDaniels isnt really comparable, he is the best wing defender for the best defense in the league on a team that is 32-14. Mcdaniels is not injury prone, is 6-10 with a seven feet plus wingspan and can guard every position on the floor. Mcdaniels is basically Isaac if Isaac would stay healthy and that is STILL probably an overpay for a guy who averages 10 points.

Suggs is a wing-only defender who frequently overextends himself and ignores his own physical and athletic limitations on the court, leading to injury. Our team has the 5th ranked defense and is 2 games above .500.

Suggs doesn't have the physical tools of Mcdaniels and is not the same level of defender.

This doesn't surprise me to be having this debate with the same posters who thought Austin Reaves would get $100M+ in the offseason and instead ended up getting basically spot on what I thought his value was.
McDaniels' defensive numbers aren't really any better than Franz the last time I checked.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
p0peye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,623
And1: 3,184
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#83 » by p0peye » Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:05 pm

eyriq wrote:
Skin wrote:Suggs is gonna get $20M+.

Franz is gonna get $40M+

Paolo is gonna get $50M+

Cole's extension was such a blunder.
Reality hits hard, man. 40% of rotations turn over every season, on average. The team being built around Suggs, Franz, and Paolo is going to look very different than it does today.


We're incapable of building a team around them while they are on rookie deals, what makes you think it'll get better when three of them are making 85% of the salary cap?

This season we have spent ~24.5M on those three and 106M on rest of crap we have on the roster.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 29,999
And1: 12,013
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#84 » by basketballRob » Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:07 pm

Franz defensive rating 108.7, McDaniels 111.6. Franz +1.9 defensive epm, McDaniels +2.1.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,924
And1: 7,221
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#85 » by eyriq » Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:18 pm

p0peye wrote:
eyriq wrote:
Skin wrote:Suggs is gonna get $20M+.

Franz is gonna get $40M+

Paolo is gonna get $50M+

Cole's extension was such a blunder.
Reality hits hard, man. 40% of rotations turn over every season, on average. The team being built around Suggs, Franz, and Paolo is going to look very different than it does today.


We're incapable of building a team around them while they are on rookie deals, what makes you think it'll get better when three of them are making 85% of the salary cap?

This season we have spent ~24.5M on those three and 106M on rest of crap we have on the roster.
My counter is that we've been collecting assets and hoping they develop. It's like collecting lottery tickets and hoping some are winners.

Once they reach maturity you start focusing on surrounding them with role players and a system that is fitted to the core. We aren't there yet but that money is going to indicate the transition to team building vs asset collection and player development.
p0peye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,623
And1: 3,184
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#86 » by p0peye » Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:26 pm

eyriq wrote:
p0peye wrote:
eyriq wrote:Reality hits hard, man. 40% of rotations turn over every season, on average. The team being built around Suggs, Franz, and Paolo is going to look very different than it does today.


We're incapable of building a team around them while they are on rookie deals, what makes you think it'll get better when three of them are making 85% of the salary cap?

This season we have spent ~24.5M on those three and 106M on rest of crap we have on the roster.
My counter is that we've been collecting assets and hoping they develop. It's like collecting lottery tickets and hoping some are winners.

Once they reach maturity you start focusing on surrounding them with role players and a system that is fitted to the core. We aren't there yet but that money is going to indicate the transition to team building vs asset collection and player development.


We've got two that panned out pretty fast, we don't need more and if we did have them - we couldn't afford to keep them or properly develop them. Team building time has crept up on us.
SKYN
RealGM
Posts: 18,434
And1: 8,759
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#87 » by SKYN » Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:30 pm

p0peye wrote:
eyriq wrote:
Skin wrote:Suggs is gonna get $20M+.

Franz is gonna get $40M+

Paolo is gonna get $50M+

Cole's extension was such a blunder.
Reality hits hard, man. 40% of rotations turn over every season, on average. The team being built around Suggs, Franz, and Paolo is going to look very different than it does today.


We're incapable of building a team around them while they are on rookie deals, what makes you think it'll get better when three of them are making 85% of the salary cap?

This season we have spent ~24.5M on those three and 106M on rest of crap we have on the roster.

The only thing helping me think that is hoping Weltman can make one critical move at the trade deadline to fix our backcourt. We need a star guard. Nothing else will really work.
User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,924
And1: 7,221
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#88 » by eyriq » Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:43 pm

p0peye wrote:
eyriq wrote:
p0peye wrote:
We're incapable of building a team around them while they are on rookie deals, what makes you think it'll get better when three of them are making 85% of the salary cap?

This season we have spent ~24.5M on those three and 106M on rest of crap we have on the roster.
My counter is that we've been collecting assets and hoping they develop. It's like collecting lottery tickets and hoping some are winners.

Once they reach maturity you start focusing on surrounding them with role players and a system that is fitted to the core. We aren't there yet but that money is going to indicate the transition to team building vs asset collection and player development.


We've got two that panned out pretty fast, we don't need more and if we did have them - we couldn't afford to keep them or properly develop them. Team building time has crept up on us.
Yeah, you're not wrong. A strong case could have been made that we should start team building last off-season BUT that would have ignored what Suggs became this season. Hard to make the call on when to flip the switch from a future value focus to current value focus and team building.

I think this off-season is when it gets real, if not this deadline. AB and Jett might not get clear paths to PT and development as a result but I feel like they were hedge bets against Suggs. Suggs clicking is huge for this team. The core is identified.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 13,879
And1: 6,316
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#89 » by Skybox » Tue Jan 30, 2024 12:36 am

eyriq wrote:
p0peye wrote:
eyriq wrote:My counter is that we've been collecting assets and hoping they develop. It's like collecting lottery tickets and hoping some are winners.

Once they reach maturity you start focusing on surrounding them with role players and a system that is fitted to the core. We aren't there yet but that money is going to indicate the transition to team building vs asset collection and player development.


We've got two that panned out pretty fast, we don't need more and if we did have them - we couldn't afford to keep them or properly develop them. Team building time has crept up on us.
Yeah, you're not wrong. A strong case could have been made that we should start team building last off-season BUT that would have ignored what Suggs became this season. Hard to make the call on when to flip the switch from a future value focus to current value focus and team building.

I think this off-season is when it gets real, if not this deadline. AB and Jett might not get clear paths to PT and development as a result but I feel like they were hedge bets against Suggs. Suggs clicking is huge for this team. The core is identified.


with all respect, I'm a big fan of Suggs...but what has he "become" really? He's really impactful. His energy is amazing...but he's far from a really special player (yet?). 12.5 pts, 2.1 fta's, 3.3 rebs, 2.4 apg. Great, maybe elite on-ball defender. Definitely some homer shades on. He's definitely capable of being a very important part of a really good starting lineup...if he's paired with a REAL scoring guard.
User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,924
And1: 7,221
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#90 » by eyriq » Tue Jan 30, 2024 12:56 am

Skybox wrote:
eyriq wrote:
p0peye wrote:
We've got two that panned out pretty fast, we don't need more and if we did have them - we couldn't afford to keep them or properly develop them. Team building time has crept up on us.
Yeah, you're not wrong. A strong case could have been made that we should start team building last off-season BUT that would have ignored what Suggs became this season. Hard to make the call on when to flip the switch from a future value focus to current value focus and team building.

I think this off-season is when it gets real, if not this deadline. AB and Jett might not get clear paths to PT and development as a result but I feel like they were hedge bets against Suggs. Suggs clicking is huge for this team. The core is identified.


with all respect, I'm a big fan of Suggs...but what has he "become" really? He's really impactful. His energy is amazing...but he's far from a really special player (yet?). 12.5 pts, 2.1 fta's, 3.3 rebs, 2.4 apg. Great, maybe elite on-ball defender. Definitely some homer shades on. He's definitely capable of being a very important part of a really good starting lineup...if he's paired with a REAL scoring guard.
I think what geeks me out is 40 3P% and 99th percentile defense. That alone is an elite 3&D player. But he's also showing growth scoring around the rim and as a secondary ball handler. His upside as a 3 level scorer with all NBA defense is exciting.
The-Stallion70
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,521
And1: 538
Joined: Mar 22, 2022

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#91 » by The-Stallion70 » Tue Jan 30, 2024 6:13 pm

If we overvalue our talent and pay Suggs a nine figure deal and Franz a full supermax then the Magic will pigeonhole themselves into being a very mediocre team.
thelead wrote:I have a memory like an elephant.
Residual-Heat
Starter
Posts: 2,143
And1: 1,301
Joined: Feb 03, 2023
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#92 » by Residual-Heat » Tue Jan 30, 2024 7:19 pm

basketballRob wrote:Franz defensive rating 108.7, McDaniels 111.6. Franz +1.9 defensive epm, McDaniels +2.1.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app

McDaniels is a great defender (aside from rebounding), and a better one than Franz. Colbini is right, Mcdaniels is a good reference. I mentioned him earlier in the thread too.

That being said, i do think the Wolves slightly overpaid for him (shouldve been closer to 20-24 mill/yr IMO). Surely they were hoping for more of a jump from him this season. I am higher on Suggs than McDaniels. I think Suggs has more offensive potential, but also injury concerns. So if we can get Suggs for 20 mill/yr I would let him sign the contract ASAP.
JoshuaPotter
Veteran
Posts: 2,613
And1: 756
Joined: Dec 19, 2022
   

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#93 » by JoshuaPotter » Wed Jan 31, 2024 6:19 pm

eyriq wrote:
Skybox wrote:
eyriq wrote:Yeah, you're not wrong. A strong case could have been made that we should start team building last off-season BUT that would have ignored what Suggs became this season. Hard to make the call on when to flip the switch from a future value focus to current value focus and team building.

I think this off-season is when it gets real, if not this deadline. AB and Jett might not get clear paths to PT and development as a result but I feel like they were hedge bets against Suggs. Suggs clicking is huge for this team. The core is identified.


with all respect, I'm a big fan of Suggs...but what has he "become" really? He's really impactful. His energy is amazing...but he's far from a really special player (yet?). 12.5 pts, 2.1 fta's, 3.3 rebs, 2.4 apg. Great, maybe elite on-ball defender. Definitely some homer shades on. He's definitely capable of being a very important part of a really good starting lineup...if he's paired with a REAL scoring guard.
I think what geeks me out is 40 3P% and 99th percentile defense. That alone is an elite 3&D player. But he's also showing growth scoring around the rim and as a secondary ball handler. His upside as a 3 level scorer with all NBA defense is exciting.


I am settling into the idea that this is Suggs floor now. We got elite defense, good shooting to spread the floor and he technically still isn't done cooking yet.

He still has enough of ceiling to imagine him as our 3rd offensive option. If he doesn't make it, that's fine. He will be paid for his 3&D ability.

We still have Black and Jett deep into the oven.
The-Stallion70
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,521
And1: 538
Joined: Mar 22, 2022

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#94 » by The-Stallion70 » Wed Jan 31, 2024 7:19 pm

Whatever Bruce Brown got, that's basically what Suggs should get.
thelead wrote:I have a memory like an elephant.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 13,879
And1: 6,316
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#95 » by Skybox » Wed Jan 31, 2024 7:52 pm

The-Stallion70 wrote:Whatever Bruce Brown got, that's basically what Suggs should get.


Bruce Brown is a good comp...but his recent deal is a complete mirage. He got overpaid on a short-term deal with a TO because IND had to spend up to the minimum payroll...like us "overpaying" for Jeff Green which absolutely didn't matter - it's like the money was sitting on the table.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 24,204
And1: 25,904
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#96 » by Knightro » Wed Jan 31, 2024 7:54 pm

The-Stallion70 wrote:Whatever Bruce Brown got, that's basically what Suggs should get.


Bruce Brown got $22.5M AAV which would be 4/90 over a long-term deal for Suggs.

But it's also likely Brown got a higher AAV than he would have on a longer deal because he was willing to take a short deal.
User avatar
thelead
RealGM
Posts: 41,449
And1: 26,392
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#97 » by thelead » Wed Jan 31, 2024 11:41 pm

Image
Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 6,372
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#98 » by Rainwater » Thu Feb 1, 2024 12:08 am

p0peye wrote:
eyriq wrote:
Skin wrote:Suggs is gonna get $20M+.

Franz is gonna get $40M+

Paolo is gonna get $50M+

Cole's extension was such a blunder.
Reality hits hard, man. 40% of rotations turn over every season, on average. The team being built around Suggs, Franz, and Paolo is going to look very different than it does today.


We're incapable of building a team around them while they are on rookie deals, what makes you think it'll get better when three of them are making 85% of the salary cap?

This season we have spent ~24.5M on those three and 106M on rest of crap we have on the roster.


I also want a move to be made but I think people also need to realize this team is still a very young team and the rebuild just happened 3 years ago. So I wouldn’t say the front office are incapable of building around the young guys, they barely had the opportunity to do so. Paolo was just drafted last year, lol.
p0peye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,623
And1: 3,184
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
 

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#99 » by p0peye » Thu Feb 1, 2024 12:23 am

Rainwater wrote:
p0peye wrote:
eyriq wrote:Reality hits hard, man. 40% of rotations turn over every season, on average. The team being built around Suggs, Franz, and Paolo is going to look very different than it does today.


We're incapable of building a team around them while they are on rookie deals, what makes you think it'll get better when three of them are making 85% of the salary cap?

This season we have spent ~24.5M on those three and 106M on rest of crap we have on the roster.


I also want a move to be made but I think people also need to realize this team is still a very young team and the rebuild just happened 3 years ago. So I wouldn’t say the front office are incapable of building around the young guys, they barely had the opportunity to do so. Paolo was just drafted last year, lol.


No, Paolo was drafted in 2022. They had opportunity to trade or sign better fitting players in offseason, when we knew what we have in Paolo and Franz, as well as their superpowers and growth areas. They have an opportunity now to make trades to improve role players around them before Feb 9th trade deadline.
Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 6,372
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: Suggs’ extension 

Post#100 » by Rainwater » Thu Feb 1, 2024 2:58 am

p0peye wrote:
Rainwater wrote:
p0peye wrote:
We're incapable of building a team around them while they are on rookie deals, what makes you think it'll get better when three of them are making 85% of the salary cap?

This season we have spent ~24.5M on those three and 106M on rest of crap we have on the roster.


I also want a move to be made but I think people also need to realize this team is still a very young team and the rebuild just happened 3 years ago. So I wouldn’t say the front office are incapable of building around the young guys, they barely had the opportunity to do so. Paolo was just drafted last year, lol.


No, Paolo was drafted in 2022. They had opportunity to trade or sign better fitting players in offseason, when we knew what we have in Paolo and Franz, as well as their superpowers and growth areas. They have an opportunity now to make trades to improve role players around them before Feb 9th trade deadline.


Sorry for the confusion but when I mean he was drafted last season I mean to say he was a rookie last season. Most teams are not building contenders in two years. And Most knew that Paolo and Franz would be great but most didn’t expect the magic to be this good. Hell, most had the magic with a losing record but I doubt that will be the case now. I just feel like the rapid success the Magic have gotten have Magic fans believing that the rebuild process is done when really it’s still in its infancy.

Return to Orlando Magic