fendilim wrote:that’s actually true.pepe1991 wrote:GelbeWand09 wrote:
Same scenario like the 57 win OKC? Same scenario like the 57 win okc with open cap space next summer? Same scenario as the 57 win OKC who get a elite player like Chet back for free the next season? Same sneraio as the 57 win OKC with more picks than 70% of the leaque combined as future asset to get cheap players or to do any trade they want?
No, that's not the same scenario.
This is most epic part of all this.
OKC traded their former 6th overall pick for 30+ years old role player because it fitted their vision, they signed starter from other playoff team.
They won 57-58 games last year AND made moves after passing first round of playoffs and playing 7 games to eventual finalist.
Magic lost in first round to a team without starting C, backup PF who lost in very next round, signed one low usage 3 and D player because "championship pedigree" , ignored guy plays same position and role as Suggs, resigned two most injury prone players from 2017 draft and called a year.
Midway through next year team is falling apart and we learn our Front office does not engage in trade talks, and most of a league views them as awkward goofballs.
Also isn't it fitting how same people who bring injuries as excuse, but bring OKC as defending point in very next sentence tend to "forget" how OKC lost Chet Holmgren, their second best player for 40 games and didn't used that as excuse? Hmm... interesting
But okc also has a mvp caliber cornerstone already. Not to mention, a treasure trove of assets.
OKC is already in the 6th year of the rebuild. Took them a while to reach this point as well. This is like our third/fourth year. Y’all have to relax.
Obviously, no moves during the deadline don’t make sense. But at the same time, you have to look at the mirror and ask yourself is it worth it to give those assets, when at best we’re just gonna be a second round team. We don’t even have a player playing at an mvp level.
The best of the best wins when they are around 25-28 years old. Even Tatum is 26, when he won his first ring. Kobe had shaq who was already at the peak of his career already. It is unrealistic to go all in and make a big splash at this point, tbh.
Slowly acquiring pieces around Franz and Paolo, sure, but, if what weltman says is true that teams are squeezing assets since we are on a losing streak, then it is not worth it.
Also, we’ve really been bugged by injuries this season.

Hell they are.
You should ask yourself will those assets be any more valuable in offseason than they are now.
Jett Howard can't unglue his as** from bench of mediocre team, how will he be any more valuable later?
Nuggets pick held more value before season even started.
Kobe was 21 when he won first title.
Tatum went to first finals at age of 23.
Lebron went to first finals at age of 22.
There is no "slowly adding talent around Paolo" if you know they exit their rookie deals, as soon as next year ( Franz) and Paolo year later.
We aren't even as injuried as Knicks last year. It's just pile of excuses to sit on hands.
We already went through this BS in 2020. Just bunch of excuses why to do nothing.




















