mattyBoi wrote:Nash is better than Paul right now...Paul will be better though.
Hornets have Peja, Chandler, West...Not just one offensive force.
David Lee is loved, mostly for his hustle...The kid leaves it all on the floor...Hes also good for a double double when given the minutes and thats with no plays being run for him.
I would take David Lee over any Knicks player based soley on potential and heart.
Kirk Hinrich got his deal because until this season, he was playing out of his mind. He lead the bulls to some 50 win seasons and into the playoffs. He was also logging big minutes on team USA. The kid was earning the pay.
Statement about AK and getting respect in the league i totally agree with you on.
White players not getting respect based on race is total garbage.
Lastly im not trying to defend anyone, but i dont think n4u was the one that made the race comments, correct me if im wrong
First of all, I'm sorry about getting mixed up on who said what. It was 1AM and I had to do a lot of stuff yesterday for the holiday and at work.
Back to the topic, Peja scores 16 PPG on 46% shooting, West scores 19 points on 47% shooting, and Chandler scores a career high 12 on 60% shooting. West was the one I was talking about, but how can you call those other two threats. Meanwhile Nash plays with Amare, who is an all NBA center (23 on 59) Barbosa is good for 17 off the bench, Grant Hill gives them 15, and Bell 12. Up until last week they also had Shawn Marion dropping 16. That is 3 guys who can drop 30 on any given, plus Grant Hill who will give them consistent scoring, and Bell who is a spot up shooter who might get hot. All the Hornets have is David West (beast, but not on Amare's level) and their own overpaid spot up shooter in Peja. Which team would you rather play with?
Other than outside shooting, Paul is much better at every aspect of the game. The simple way to look at it is that Paul's PER is 5 points higher than Nash's and that doesn't take defense into account. Nash plays in a faster offense (more shots), with better players and averages only 1 more assist per game than Paul.
If you consider it a sacrilege for Paul to outrank Nash , get a tape of Feb. 6 Hornets-Suns game and it might be easier to swallow. Paul got the better of Nash in that pairing just like he has every time they have faced this year. 42 points 9 assists 8 steals, against a guy who is supposed to be better (32 points, 12 ast, 10 TO)? The thing that I don't think people realize is that Chris Paul is on pace to beat Allen Iverson's best PER by a full point which will be a new record for small guards. Nash has never even appraoched these numbers (his best is 23.87). I will take Chris Paul today, tomorrow, and five years from now.
You are right that Kirk Hinrich played out of his mind for the Bulls, but he wasn't their leading scorer, he didn't run the offense, the ball didn't go through him in crunch time, and he wasn't the first player most GMs asked for when they called the Bulls for a trade. On top of that, I don't see how he logged big minutes for team USA, when he didn't even make the team.
About the Knicks, if Randolph can give me 25 and 12, and David Lee's ceiling is 10 and 10, all the hustle in the world won't convince me he is better. Lee doesn't have much room for growth which is why he went 30th in the draft. He is a defensive liability, and he has no post offesnse. His motor makes him a monster on the boards and his contract is easier to swallow but, based on production, he isn't the best prospect on the Knicks. If you want to talk upside, Nate Robinson is the best their, and the most clutch performer is Crawford. I love David Lee and the rest of the Florida guys, but I don't see myself getting excited about anyone that teams attack every time they are on the floor.