tiderulz wrote:so anyone drafting #9 should expect a better player than anyone drafting #8 because of past performance? it just means the people that picked at #8 picked wrong. and i say it again. Anyone drafting a top-10 pick is expecting a starter. anyone drafting a top-3 pick is expecting an all-star, at least once. It doesnt always pan out, but that is what is expected. anyone drafting 11-20 is expecting a bench/spot starter. just my view
Respectfully, if I understand your argument here it is that many NBA teams do not draft well in this range: say in the 3-10 slots. I probably agree with you, as there are so many safe picks typically taken in this range.
Looking back at recent #8's:
How was Jaxson Hayes drafted over Rui Hachimura, Cam Reddish, or Tyler Herro.
How was Collin Sexton drafted over .... actually this was a good pick.
How was Frank Ntilikina .... on draft night it seemed like a good pick even though there are All stars below him.
How was Marquese Chriss drafted over Domantas Sabonis or Taurean Prince.
How was Stanley Johnson drafted over Frank Kaminsky; just kidding, but Myles Turner was clearly the #8 here for me.
How was Nik Stauskas over Noah Vonleh, Doug McDermott, Dario Šarić, Zach LaVine.
My comments are not about a re-draft based on who the players became (we cannot dis teams for passing on Bam Adebayo).
My comments are about clear value over the actual players selected.
Back to my point in all of this, a point I think you agree with: F-Wagner is a value pick at #8. Your central argument is that Mr. #8 should be better than Mr. #9. Well Davion Mitchell also looks pretty good out of the gate. Right now, only Alperen Şengün looks like he will be a better NBA baller than F-Wagner. So hard to knock the 8-selection here by Orlando. Again, I am assuming you agree with that.
..