Official Speculation Thread (Pt. XXVIII: Offseason Edition)

NEM · Post #821 » by **NEM** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:55 pm

j-ragg wrote:Does Webster have a non-guaranteed deal? Why would we just cut him?

Only guaranteed 600,000 if waived by July 1, 2012

Nyce_1 · Post #822 » by **Nyce_1** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:57 pm

RawLewD12 wrote:
Cigamodnalro wrote:JRich for Martell Webster's expiring. Book it. Future pick, cash, rights to Fran may or may not be involved.

I actually said that a few weeks ago, and I could see it happening. Id be happy because we could just cut Webster and save money immediately

This would be another win trade for us. If we're planning to make a big splash this offseason, via FA, this trade is no brainer because of the instant cap relief. However, if 2013 is set in stone as the goal, I'd rather get Darko for 1 year rental. I'd like to see two shot blockers defend Miami.

fendilim · Post #823 » by **fendilim** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:01 pm

Webster would be a nice acquisition 2 years ago, but weren't there reports that we saying that the back injury Martell had prior to being traded to Minnesota would affect his career?

Nyce_1 · Post #824 » by **Nyce_1** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:02 pm

fendilim wrote:Webster would be a nice acquisition 2 years ago, but weren't there reports that we saying that the back injury Martell had prior to being traded to Minnesota would affect his career?

no one cares about the player. this is strictly a cap-saving move.

Cigamodnalro · Post #825 » by **Cigamodnalro** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:03 pm

fendilim wrote:Webster would be a nice acquisition 2 years ago, but weren't there reports that we saying that the back injury Martell had prior to being traded to Minnesota would affect his career?

He's damaged goods. Still, though, only 25 and we'd have him on a one year trial basis. Wouldn't be the worst backup to Redick, especially if we keep Dwight and our inside-out offense.

trebone · Post #826 » by **trebone** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:05 pm

fendilim wrote:Webster would be a nice acquisition 2 years ago, but weren't there reports that we saying that the back injury Martell had prior to being traded to Minnesota would affect his career?

that deal would be purely a salary dump, I am sure everybody here thinks JJ can produce at least what JRich does starting most likely better in every statistical category.

j-ragg · Post #827 » by **j-ragg** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:07 pm

RawLewD12 wrote:
j-ragg wrote:Does Webster have a non-guaranteed deal? Why would we just cut him?

Only guaranteed 600,000 if waived by July 1, 2012

Ah, ok. Thanks.

recko321 · Post #828 » by **recko321** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:10 pm

J-Rich + #19 for Webster? then we cut him

magicfan217 · Post #829 » by **magicfan217** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:11 pm

a year and a half after our major deal with Phoenix and we have Earl Clark and two guys who we would trade for a half empty bag of potato chips. F*** you Otis.

Cigamodnalro · Post #830 » by **Cigamodnalro** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:12 pm

magicfan217 wrote:a year and a half after our major deal with Phoenix and we have Earl Clark and two guys who we would trade for a half empty bag of potato chips. F*** you Otis.

Clark is a FA.

MoMM · Post #831 » by **MoMM** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:13 pm

magicfan217 wrote:a year and a half after our major deal with Phoenix and we have Earl Clark and two guys who we would trade for a half empty bag of potato chips. F*** you Otis.

hehe, Clark will leave in a few weeks...

trebone · Post #832 » by **trebone** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:16 pm

magicfan217 wrote:a year and a half after our major deal with Phoenix and we have Earl Clark and two guys who we would trade for a half empty bag of potato chips. F*** you Otis.

you have it all wrong my friend, we would take an empty bag of potato chips to rid ourselves of them 8-)

arsenal6106 · Post #833 » by **arsenal6106** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:19 pm

Good morning posters! Whatever happens, today is going to be a good day for the Magic organization and its fans.

Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk

magicfan217 · Post #834 » by **magicfan217** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:23 pm

Gonna be upset if we use JJ with our pick to only move up 4 or 5 positions....I really think that's a misuse of our limited assets at this point. Now if we can package him with the #19 for a top 10 pick that's probably another story, depending on whose available (although I highly doubt that's possible).

I would love to see us somehow end up with MKG...if he slips all the way to 5 (or later) he's gonna be an absolute steal. Not sure (outside of Dwight) how we could even possibly get that high. I guess I would be satisfied if we were somehow able to deal the rot that was formerly known as Jason Richardson and just took the BPA at #19.

Blue_and_Whte · Post #835 » by **Blue_and_Whte** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:23 pm

recko321 wrote:J-Rich + #19 for Webster? then we cut him

Wow..that would be a really......boring. After all the speculation threads and thousands of posts and predictions that we made, if all Rob does is move jrich + #19 for webster just to waive him..not only would i think that's a stupid move this board would riot.

Why would Orlando need to move jrich AND the 19th pick for a banged up Webster? That's way too much.

Ahmadab · Post #836 » by **Ahmadab** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:24 pm

@MikePradaSBN A fair warning: @SBNStudios is going to put out something very soon that's going to blow everyone's mind

Hmmm

Blue_and_Whte · Post #837 » by **Blue_and_Whte** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:26 pm

Ahmadab wrote:
@MikePradaSBN A fair warning: @SBNStudios is going to put out something very soon that's going to blow everyone's mind

Hmmm

Who's that?

SolidSnake008 · Post #838 » by **SolidSnake008** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:28 pm

MikePrada huh? sure it isn't some kind of fashion report he's going to put out?

magic_turk · Post #839 » by **magic_turk** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:29 pm

What's SBN Studios?

Ahmadab · Post #840 » by **Ahmadab** » Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:33 pm

magic_turk wrote:What's SBN Studios?

http://www.sbnation.com/