J-Mezzy wrote:pepe1991 wrote:J-Mezzy wrote:
So your answer to my question is yes. You still think he is not a good player.
I think of him same i think about any other non shooting guard.
Not gonna cut it.
There is good reason why Westbrook, probably one of top 10 best athletes in history, one of two players in history who averaged triple double for a season and only nba player who averaged triple double for TWO seasons never won anything.
That reason is 30,4% three point shooting.
ofc other reason is decision making under pressure, but if he could make open shots he would be top 5- 10 player in history. But he can't. And that's why he can't even be top 5 player today.
Understand
But you are judging Markelle on a standard of players that can lead you to a championship and at this point you are absolutely right
But neither would Vuc nor Evan and you seem to be less critical of them.
I think there is a world where we can like both crops of players (the skilled vets evan, vuc and the not so skilled athletes fultz, isaac)
Teams can run offense with making C and SG pretty much nothing but : screen setter for C and spot up shooter for SG.
It's impossible to limit usage of starting point guard, therfore it's hardest position to "hide" his shortcommings.
if you wanna find non shooting PG on championship roster you have to go back to 2008, 12 years ago to Rondo and Celtics.
Even Parker shot 37% for 3 in playoffs of 2013-14 but they had DIaw ( 40% for 3) , Mills (40% for 3) and Ginobili (39% for 3 ) as secundary playmakers when things didn't go well with Parker.
I think Clippers can find themselfs in bad position if they end up having Pat Bev and Lou Williams as only "playmakers" and playoffs are rolling as i don't trust any of them late in a game. Fortunate for them Lakers have same issue. Pretty much Lebron is only player who can ballhandle.
That's why i'm confident that Houston will be scary matchup for both teams. Harden, Westbrook, Gordon can be hard to contain , especially if they enage into their pace and transition.