KillMonger wrote:;feature=emb_logo
Schmitz explained it clearly why Vuc and having stretch bigs really helped us with non shooting threat pgs like fultz and formerly EP.
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
KillMonger wrote:;feature=emb_logo
pepe1991 wrote:He shoots 5/18 (27,7% ) for 3 since basketball returned. According to nba tracking, all 18 threes were wide open ( closest defender more than 6 feet away)
So shot maybe looks better, efficiency is still same.
According to scouting reports before short college season, he was never known as good outside shooter in highschool. It would be interesting to know would he be good 3 point shooter from nba range and by nba standards, if he never got TOS...
zaymon wrote:pepe1991 wrote:He shoots 5/18 (27,7% ) for 3 since basketball returned. According to nba tracking, all 18 threes were wide open ( closest defender more than 6 feet away)
So shot maybe looks better, efficiency is still same.
According to scouting reports before short college season, he was never known as good outside shooter in highschool. It would be interesting to know would he be good 3 point shooter from nba range and by nba standards, if he never got TOS...
His free throw percentage was also low. Perhaps he would have problems regardless of TOS. His shooting touch around the rim and in midrange gives a lot of hope though.
pepe1991 wrote:He shoots 5/18 (27,7% ) for 3 since basketball returned. According to nba tracking, all 18 threes were wide open ( closest defender more than 6 feet away)
So shot maybe looks better, efficiency is still same.
According to scouting reports before short college season, he was never known as good outside shooter in highschool. It would be interesting to know would he be good 3 point shooter from nba range and by nba standards, if he never got TOS...
pepe1991 wrote:He shoots 5/18 (27,7% ) for 3 since basketball returned. According to nba tracking, all 18 threes were wide open ( closest defender more than 6 feet away)
So shot maybe looks better, efficiency is still same.
According to scouting reports before short college season, he was never known as good outside shooter in highschool. It would be interesting to know would he be good 3 point shooter from nba range and by nba standards, if he never got TOS...
thelead wrote:pepe1991 wrote:He shoots 5/18 (27,7% ) for 3 since basketball returned. According to nba tracking, all 18 threes were wide open ( closest defender more than 6 feet away)
So shot maybe looks better, efficiency is still same.
According to scouting reports before short college season, he was never known as good outside shooter in highschool. It would be interesting to know would he be good 3 point shooter from nba range and by nba standards, if he never got TOS...
Where do you get your stats? I'm not blaming you but they're almost always wrong. He is 6/16 (37.5%) from 3 since basketball returned while taking 4 or 5 end of quarter threes.
thelead wrote:pepe1991 wrote:He shoots 5/18 (27,7% ) for 3 since basketball returned. According to nba tracking, all 18 threes were wide open ( closest defender more than 6 feet away)
So shot maybe looks better, efficiency is still same.
According to scouting reports before short college season, he was never known as good outside shooter in highschool. It would be interesting to know would he be good 3 point shooter from nba range and by nba standards, if he never got TOS...
Where do you get your stats? I'm not blaming you but they're almost always wrong. He is 6/16 (37.5%) from 3 since basketball returned while taking 4 or 5 end of quarter threes.
Skin wrote:thelead wrote:pepe1991 wrote:He shoots 5/18 (27,7% ) for 3 since basketball returned. According to nba tracking, all 18 threes were wide open ( closest defender more than 6 feet away)
So shot maybe looks better, efficiency is still same.
According to scouting reports before short college season, he was never known as good outside shooter in highschool. It would be interesting to know would he be good 3 point shooter from nba range and by nba standards, if he never got TOS...
Where do you get your stats? I'm not blaming you but they're almost always wrong. He is 6/16 (37.5%) from 3 since basketball returned while taking 4 or 5 end of quarter threes.
Wow, I knew pepe had a terrible hatred for Fultz from day 1, but false manipulation of stats and getting caught has got to be a new low.
Skin wrote:thelead wrote:pepe1991 wrote:He shoots 5/18 (27,7% ) for 3 since basketball returned. According to nba tracking, all 18 threes were wide open ( closest defender more than 6 feet away)
So shot maybe looks better, efficiency is still same.
According to scouting reports before short college season, he was never known as good outside shooter in highschool. It would be interesting to know would he be good 3 point shooter from nba range and by nba standards, if he never got TOS...
Where do you get your stats? I'm not blaming you but they're almost always wrong. He is 6/16 (37.5%) from 3 since basketball returned while taking 4 or 5 end of quarter threes.
Wow, I knew pepe had a terrible hatred for Fultz from day 1, but false manipulation of stats and getting caught has got to be a new low.
Bakomagic wrote:Skin wrote:thelead wrote:Where do you get your stats? I'm not blaming you but they're almost always wrong. He is 6/16 (37.5%) from 3 since basketball returned while taking 4 or 5 end of quarter threes.
Wow, I knew pepe had a terrible hatred for Fultz from day 1, but false manipulation of stats and getting caught has got to be a new low.
I am not surprised, in our offseason threads he would continually post that Markelle would probably never step foot on the court, that he was trying to trick Weltham into picking up his option and that Markelle didn't really love the game. He even went as far as to say that his mom/sister would be a distraction to the team.
He's been on the Markelle Hate train since the beginning, you would think he is a sixer fan or maybe he is DJ Augustine's burner account?
If Markelle played outstanding he would say small sample size, teams are still getting back in shape or resting/tanking. Yes Markelle hasn't shot great in the bubble but he has shown throughout the rest of the season (60 games or whatever) that he can make the midrange shot and get to the rim and score on top of being our best perimeter playmaker. That's a good sign for a guy who is young and just finished his first full season.
pepe1991 wrote:Bakomagic wrote:Skin wrote:Wow, I knew pepe had a terrible hatred for Fultz from day 1, but false manipulation of stats and getting caught has got to be a new low.
I am not surprised, in our offseason threads he would continually post that Markelle would probably never step foot on the court, that he was trying to trick Weltham into picking up his option and that Markelle didn't really love the game. He even went as far as to say that his mom/sister would be a distraction to the team.
He's been on the Markelle Hate train since the beginning, you would think he is a sixer fan or maybe he is DJ Augustine's burner account?
If Markelle played outstanding he would say small sample size, teams are still getting back in shape or resting/tanking. Yes Markelle hasn't shot great in the bubble but he has shown throughout the rest of the season (60 games or whatever) that he can make the midrange shot and get to the rim and score on top of being our best perimeter playmaker. That's a good sign for a guy who is young and just finished his first full season.
Doesn't help he was traded for somebody who is actually good at basketball and already allstar.
:
Skybox wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Bakomagic wrote:
I am not surprised, in our offseason threads he would continually post that Markelle would probably never step foot on the court, that he was trying to trick Weltham into picking up his option and that Markelle didn't really love the game. He even went as far as to say that his mom/sister would be a distraction to the team.
He's been on the Markelle Hate train since the beginning, you would think he is a sixer fan or maybe he is DJ Augustine's burner account?
If Markelle played outstanding he would say small sample size, teams are still getting back in shape or resting/tanking. Yes Markelle hasn't shot great in the bubble but he has shown throughout the rest of the season (60 games or whatever) that he can make the midrange shot and get to the rim and score on top of being our best perimeter playmaker. That's a good sign for a guy who is young and just finished his first full season.
Doesn't help he was traded for somebody who is actually good at basketball and already allstar.
:
As far as ORL is concerned, he was traded for a guy that's out of the league.
Skin wrote:Skybox wrote:pepe1991 wrote:
Doesn't help he was traded for somebody who is actually good at basketball and already allstar.
:
As far as ORL is concerned, he was traded for a guy that's out of the league.
I wonder if pepe thinks we gave up Ben Simmons and not Jonathon Simmons.![]()
![]()
Skybox wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Bakomagic wrote:
I am not surprised, in our offseason threads he would continually post that Markelle would probably never step foot on the court, that he was trying to trick Weltham into picking up his option and that Markelle didn't really love the game. He even went as far as to say that his mom/sister would be a distraction to the team.
He's been on the Markelle Hate train since the beginning, you would think he is a sixer fan or maybe he is DJ Augustine's burner account?
If Markelle played outstanding he would say small sample size, teams are still getting back in shape or resting/tanking. Yes Markelle hasn't shot great in the bubble but he has shown throughout the rest of the season (60 games or whatever) that he can make the midrange shot and get to the rim and score on top of being our best perimeter playmaker. That's a good sign for a guy who is young and just finished his first full season.
Doesn't help he was traded for somebody who is actually good at basketball and already allstar.
:
As far as ORL is concerned, he was traded for a guy that's out of the league.