The Real Dalic wrote:Shady Franchise wrote:The Real Dalic wrote:I would prefer Milwaukee. L.A. is a beautiful place to visit but to expensive to live in. They also have a lot of whack jobs and fake people there. I'd rather have the quiet peaceful place of Milwaukee than going through the hell of L.A. I'm also not one that's looking for fame and fortune though. I'll be happy living my boring normal life as long as I have a decent job, a wife, and kids. Milwaukee is a better place for that stuff.
You really don't know L.A. then. It's far from beautiful. The City is covered in graffiti, trash, homeless and traffic, yet you say it's beautiful. You're contradicting yourself. If you were a player of the Lakers or Clippers, you'd live outside of LA. There are so many beautiful areas right outside of L.A. that will blow Milwaukee out of the water. If you played for the Bucks, you wouldn't necessarily live in Milwaukee, right? It's the same for the Lakers and Clips. I understand you have an opinion and preference, but what you're saying about L.A. is simply not true. Besides, there are whack jobs and fake people everywhere. Take the nightclub incident that happened in your neck of the woods for example. Does that mean Orlando is full of whack jobs? Next you'll tell us that Disneyland and Hollywood are part of L.A.
I don't wanna go into detail about why I think there's nutjobs in L.A. because that would start a political war, I'm not getting into that. But I didn't mean whack jobs as in murderers and mentally insane, I meant views and opinions, let's just say they're not my cup of tea. It's also not close that L.A. has fake people everywhere, plastic city. But also, you still haven't answered the expensive thing, California is an awful place too live due to taxes. The rich lose nearly half of what they earn over there, no thanks. I keep what I earn. Milwaukee all day for me over Cali.
I didn't know I had to agree or disagree with your comment about expenses. And though I agree it is expensive to live here, the rich flock to California because you can make a boat load of it here. When you can make almost your entire contract as a player doing commercials and other advertisement/entertainment gigs, who cares if you have to pay more taxes? Since when has that "no taxes" or lower taxes argument brought Orlando or Milwaukee more free agents than L.A.? Also, Milwaukee may be a nice place to raise a family (IDK because I've never been), it's probably not that fun for the young, 20-something year old NBA player whose not even thinking about schools, or kid friendly neighborhoods. I just think the direction of your thoughts is all wrong when comparing Milwaukee to L.A. Good for you and your opinions if you choose Milwaukee over L.A. I would much rather be in L.A., but the again, I've grown up close to BIG cities my whole life, so I'm accustomed to the fast pace. I'll just end it right there.
"
