j-ragg wrote:I always wondered had we drafted Emeka Okafor like most would have done, would we have stayed in Orlando?
That's a really good question.
Moderators: Knightro, Howard Mass, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, ChosenSavior, SOUL, UCF
j-ragg wrote:I always wondered had we drafted Emeka Okafor like most would have done, would we have stayed in Orlando?
MagicFan101 wrote:I see everyone is quick to abandon the team if they leave Orlando and, at first, that is my reaction as well.
But I left Florida 8 years ago and still passionately support the Magic. People move around all the time and still support their teams. Is it really so different if the team moves? It will be the same players... I know, I know... it won't really be the same. But it is an interesting question.
Blue_and_Whte wrote:MagicFan101 wrote:I see everyone is quick to abandon the team if they leave Orlando and, at first, that is my reaction as well.
But I left Florida 8 years ago and still passionately support the Magic. People move around all the time and still support their teams. Is it really so different if the team moves? It will be the same players... I know, I know... it won't really be the same. But it is an interesting question.
There are so many unknown variables. Half of the teams in the league lost money so using the "they lost money, so it automatically means they're moving" logic would apply to all of them.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
MagicFan101 wrote:According to Zach Lowe and Brian Windhorst, the following 9 teams lost money last season:
Atlanta Hawks
Brooklyn Nets
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Memphis Grizzlies
Milwaukee Bucks
Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs
Washington Wizards
This is even after revenue sharing. I'm not sure how we could say "the Magic do well financially."
Read more at http://www.slamonline.com/nba/14-nba-teams-lost-money-2016-17/#H18lCIrJBICJ7iB2.99
MagicFan101 wrote:Blue_and_Whte wrote:MagicFan101 wrote:I see everyone is quick to abandon the team if they leave Orlando and, at first, that is my reaction as well.
But I left Florida 8 years ago and still passionately support the Magic. People move around all the time and still support their teams. Is it really so different if the team moves? It will be the same players... I know, I know... it won't really be the same. But it is an interesting question.
There are so many unknown variables. Half of the teams in the league lost money so using the "they lost money, so it automatically means they're moving" logic would apply to all of them.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
There is a lot more to it than just "they lost money." Other than Brooklyn, I don't think any team is facing the change of ownership Orlando is in the near future. Sure, our change will still be within the family but it does come with a change of mind set. With teams now selling for billions of dollars and the Magic struggling so much recently it is at least worth discussing the likelyhood that someone tries to overpay for the right to move them to Seattle or Vegas for example.
Money is like power. Those who have it only want more. If you are fighting to come up with hidden revenue to argue against their loss report, I think that is enough in itself to highlight the issue of "money is being left on the table" for the Magic organization.
RickB-Orlando wrote:MagicFan101 wrote:According to Zach Lowe and Brian Windhorst, the following 9 teams lost money last season:
Atlanta Hawks
Brooklyn Nets
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Memphis Grizzlies
Milwaukee Bucks
Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs
Washington Wizards
This is even after revenue sharing. I'm not sure how we could say "the Magic do well financially."
Read more at http://www.slamonline.com/nba/14-nba-teams-lost-money-2016-17/#H18lCIrJBICJ7iB2.99
Well, it depends entirely on how you define a loss.
Did they actually inject cash into the team in order to continue operations? Doubtful.
Did they *show* a loss while being cash-flow positive? Probably.
MagicFan101 wrote:
Regardless of which side of the +/- curve the business landed on, the FACT remains that the Orlando Magic are not a money earning machine the way other franchises are. Obviously you can't compete with NY or LA in Orlando but you should be able to run your business well enough to not have to consistently earn good money in this business.
j-ragg wrote:I always wondered had we drafted Emeka Okafor like most would have done, would we have stayed in Orlando?
NEM wrote:Is this thread a joke? lol Orlando is one of the fastest growing markets in the COUNTRY and we still have 17 years left on the lease for the arena which would cost about as much as relocation itself would. There is 0 chance that the magic relocate. Even if RDV sells the team, the new ownership would be dumb to move from here. I could easily see the Grizzlies moving though.
NEM wrote:Is this thread a joke? lol Orlando is one of the fastest growing markets in the COUNTRY and we still have 17 years left on the lease for the arena which would cost about as much as relocation itself would. There is 0 chance that the magic relocate. Even if RDV sells the team, the new ownership would be dumb to move from here.
OrlandO wrote:I think a couple years ago they lost like 2 million... that seems acceptable for a really bad rebuilding team.
AddiFB wrote:Orlando as a market is money for investors and owners. Like it or not, tourists bring a lot of money to Orlando and even though they aren't as active or loud during games, they put their asses in the seats. Money. I'm one of these tourists. I've spent A LOT of money there, both in Amway Center and just in Orlando in general. Hope my money had some impact The city, state in general and theme parks in Orlando bring a lot of greens and the NBA knows it.
Please don't relocate. Ever. EVERRRR
MagicFan101 wrote:RickB-Orlando wrote:MagicFan101 wrote:According to Zach Lowe and Brian Windhorst, the following 9 teams lost money last season:
Atlanta Hawks
Brooklyn Nets
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Memphis Grizzlies
Milwaukee Bucks
Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs
Washington Wizards
This is even after revenue sharing. I'm not sure how we could say "the Magic do well financially."
Read more at http://www.slamonline.com/nba/14-nba-teams-lost-money-2016-17/#H18lCIrJBICJ7iB2.99
Well, it depends entirely on how you define a loss.
Did they actually inject cash into the team in order to continue operations? Doubtful.
Did they *show* a loss while being cash-flow positive? Probably.
Again, we're clearly getting caught up on details to favor a desired result.
Regardless of which side of the +/- curve the business landed on, the FACT remains that the Orlando Magic are not a money earning machine the way other franchises are. Obviously you can't compete with NY or LA in Orlando but you should be able to run your business well enough to not have to consistently earn good money in this business.
Now, there are many owners who are passionate about the sport, the fans and the town they represent and this is more meaningful to them then just money. We happen to have such an owner ... for now. And THAT is what I am really trying to get at.
I absolutely believe RDV's family loves Orlando and the Magic. But do they love both enough to say no during a dry spell when a big check comes their way?
That is the question.