thelead wrote:pepe1991 wrote:But Warriors don't need KD, he was just cherry on top ....
He was. He guarantees a championship. The warriors just ran into a good (not great) team that has the best 2-way player in the league. Kawhi is SO underrated.
No KD means they would have had a ton of money to upgrade the bench.
Having no KD would mean nothing for their bench with Curry, Klay, Green ,Iggy and Livigstone combining for $99M in season where salary cap is $99M. MLE is only thing they could use with or without KD to improve, and that went to Cousins, he is just shell of former self but let's not act that they would sign some megastar with $5,5M.
Without KD they would not won last year ( would lose to Houston ) and maybe not even year before ( again, bumpy Houston series).
They were never all time great team, despite 73-9 season, they harldy beat Cavs without Love and Irving and once Cavs, year later got physical with them ,they gave up 3-1 lead. In same year, Westbrook horrific decision making was key reason why they passed OKC.
This series vs Raptors isn't even competitive , last two Ls were not even close games. They lost by 13 and 15 points .
Bucks gave Raptors more trouble than KD-less Warriors. Last night game was over in 3rd quater.
Hell, if they didn't pull up one legit great quater, in first game, Raptors would already have parade today.
Overall Warriors are great team ,but last year they would not win without Durant ,and this year they will lose, because Durant injury. Curry is all time great player ,but in finals he lays egg every year. Even this year he only shoots 41% and 35% for 3. As lead PG has 5,5 assists.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon