RealGM

What's The Trade Price On Mo Bamba?

I'm a Mavs fan, so feel free to include their players/picks in a deal. Luka and KP are off limits though, of course. lol.

Dennis Smith Jr.....

Oh wait..

Pass

Honestly, I don't see anyone id give up a top 6 pick for, that is just me. And you have 2 studs, so if you even have a pick next year it probably wont be good.

the problem is, Dallas doesnt have any other good, young players. and honestly, i wouldnt want KP. i worry about his continued health. He is a decent big man, but i dont view him as a star.

Luka :p

From the Mavericks... with Doncic and Porzingis off the table...

There's probably not a deal that makes sense.

Yeah Id trade him for DSJ last deadline...too bad you dont have him.Pass.
If you check trade checker list of your trade eligible players is short

THJ
Lee
Jackson
Brunson

not counting nonames like brokerhofferrson clevalandson

So.Easy nope You dont have anything interesting to offer.

Come back at the trade deadline. Let's see what we have in him.

Prime Dirk.

The uncertainty surrounding Bamba makes him very difficult if not impossible to trade at the moment. You can't value him properly.

From a trade-value perspective, I would rank his NBA value as in the 80-150 range. That means an asset and a first should pry him loose from a pure talent/expectation level. But I cannot see the Magic trading him for such a package.

For me Bamba being traded would be something of a package to increase the SG line. Say Fournier, future first, and Bamba for DeMar DeRozan.

As stated above, the Mavs do not have a package that could lead to a DeRozan-type asset.

IMO, Brunson + future first would be fair value. But it's hard to see the Magic giving up on Bamba and trading him for fair value anytime soon.

haosmoove wrote:IMO, Brunson + future first would be fair value. But it's hard to see the Magic giving up on Bamba and trading him for fair value anytime soon.

Brunson yet another backup pg ...and 1st (propably mid to late) is a fair value?

Ok



At least you noticed thats not gonna fly.

drsd wrote:From a trade-value perspective, I would rank his NBA value as in the 80-150 range. That means an asset and a first should pry him loose from a pure talent/expectation level. But I cannot see the Magic trading him for such a package.

For me Bamba being traded would be something of a package to increase the SG line. Say Fournier, future first, and Bamba for DeMar DeRozan.

As stated above, the Cavs do not have a package that could lead to a DeRozan-type asset.

Why Cavs are on your mind?

Furinkazan wrote:

haosmoove wrote:IMO, Brunson + future first would be fair value. But it's hard to see the Magic giving up on Bamba and trading him for fair value anytime soon.

Brunson yet another backup pg ...and 1st (propably mid to late) is a fair value?

Ok



At least you noticed thats not gonna fly.

Do you honestly believe that Mavs will make the playoffs in the Western Conference this season? If not, it's a lottery pick with a chance to be top 4. This is much higher value than late 1st.

I somewhat agree with your opinion on Brunson, I also think his trajectory is a back-up PG in this league. However, a prospect is a prospect and he qualifies as an asset on rookie scale contract. He also fills the position of need for this team.

IMO, an asset and a pick is about the right value for Bamba. I think someone else mentioned this as well. I looked through the Mavs roster and Brunson is the only player close to being an asset outside of Luka/Porzingis.

Furinkazan wrote:Why Cavs are on your mind?

Auto-spell corrected takes "Mavs" to "Cavs" on my laptop.


..

His value is low, but I wouldn't trade him for Brunson + 1st today, maybe in the trade deadline when we know better the kind of pick that we would get and if we know that we are short at PG (Fultz still injured).

Brunson averaged 9/3 last season in 21mpg (14/4.5 post All-Star Game), it's very good for a backup, IMO.

Bamba won't be traded until he's into his next contract. Dallas is more likely to get Vucevic than Bamba

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app

Furinkazan wrote:

haosmoove wrote:IMO, Brunson + future first would be fair value. But it's hard to see the Magic giving up on Bamba and trading him for fair value anytime soon.

Brunson yet another backup pg ...and 1st (propably mid to late) is a fair value?

Ok



At least you noticed thats not gonna fly.

that pick cant be until 2025.

haosmoove wrote:

Furinkazan wrote:

haosmoove wrote:IMO, Brunson + future first would be fair value. But it's hard to see the Magic giving up on Bamba and trading him for fair value anytime soon.

Brunson yet another backup pg ...and 1st (propably mid to late) is a fair value?

Ok



At least you noticed thats not gonna fly.

Do you honestly believe that Mavs will make the playoffs in the Western Conference this season? If not, it's a lottery pick with a chance to be top 4. This is much higher value than late 1st.

I somewhat agree with your opinion on Brunson, I also think his trajectory is a back-up PG in this league. However, a prospect is a prospect and he qualifies as an asset on rookie scale contract. He also fills the position of need for this team.

IMO, an asset and a pick is about the right value for Bamba. I think someone else mentioned this as well. I looked through the Mavs roster and Brunson is the only player close to being an asset outside of Luka/Porzingis.

Dallas traded their next 2 available picks to NY. they cant trade another 1st until 2025