Knightro wrote:Ok just did the math here... if Okeke had signed this offseason for the standard 120% scale, he'd have made roughly 15M if both of his options got picked up and 22.5M if he got his qualifying offer.
19-20: 3,121,080
20-21: 3,277,080
21-22: 3,433,320 (team option)
22-23: 5,266,712 (team option)
Qualifying Offer: 7,399,730
Total over 4 years: $15,098,192
Total with QO: 22,497,922
By waiting a year and signing in 2020, he'll make approximately 16M over four years and 24M more over five years.
20-21: 3,317,160
21-22: 3,483,120
22-23: 3,649,080 (team option)
23-24: 5,597,688 (team option)
Qualifying Offer: 7,864,751
Total over 4 years: 16,047,048
Total with QO: 23,911,799
Plus I'd imagine Okeke will get the maximum amount for a G-Leaguer to go continue his rehab in Lakeland this year, so probably another 50-100K.
So Okeke is looking at probably 1.1M or so in additional money by delaying his contract a year. And considering he'll only be 25 when he's up for his extension (instead of 24), I highly doubt it will negatively effect him too much.
He is losing money by agreeing to this. He is delaying his path towards free agency and losing a full year of earning potential. That's worth a lot more than $1.1M unless he completely busts before he ever hits free agency.
There is no reason not to get paid while you rehab. Michael Porter Jr. did not agree to this. Harry Giles did not agree to this. There is no chance that I would agree to this if I were representing the 16th pick in the NBA draft. This leads me to believe that his representation floated this before the draft because they were very concerned about whether or not they could secure guaranteed money.
I expect that this is a management team that was trying to make a cash grab on the heels of Okeke's performance in Auburn's tournament run because they were rather pessimistic about his future prospects. He could've returned to school, but that probably wouldn't have helped his draft stock given the timing and nature of his injury. Keep in mind that this is the same injury that derailed Harry Giles' career. Giles is only four months older than Okeke, but he was the consensus top high school player in his class before blowing out his knee. He wasn't the same player after the injury. There really are no guarantees that Okeke returns as the player he was.
I think our management outsmarted themselves here. They essentially traded this year's pick for a worse pick next year (Okeke is probably a late 1st-round or early 2nd-round pick next year if he had returned to school). By that time, you would have a better idea of where Okeke was in his recovery. By declaring this year, Okeke's management team was essentially forcing teams to make a decision based on less information. That they agreed to this deal tells me that they didn't like the feedback they were getting leading up to the draft.
This is all rather confusing. I maintain that I don't really believe our front office has an appreciation for economics. We've taken on substantial risk with all of this and for what? This isn't a high-ceiling prospect.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991