MagicMatic wrote:The difference is that at 14-18 it’s very possible, with this roster, to draft a player that they deem “best” while also being capable of contributing.
Just because you make the statement that the draft pick is bound to be a “rotational back up” doesn’t mean it’s 100% true.
For example, they could absolutely think Precious Achiuwa is the “best” player to draft at Orlandos position. I still think it would be a dumb decision. Why? Because that player isn’t getting minutes on this roster over AG, Isaac, Vuc, Aminu, Bamba, etc. Nor does he provide a skill set Orlando is missing that deep in the draft.
Boiling everything down to “the FO will make the right decision always based on their metrics” is the same reason this roster is still imbalanced.
Now this I agree with.
I don’t believe the issue is “drafting BPA” at all.
The main issue I have with this front office is that they have shown an inability to trade away veteran players who are eating up minutes from their younger guys.
In fact, the Weltman and Hammond haven’t just shown an unwillingness to alleviate roster balance concerns, they’ve gone the opposite way and actively created roster crunches with their decisions in free agency.
Drafting Mo Bamba wasn’t the problem. Resigning Vucevic to a four year deal after they picked a center 6th overall was the problem.
Drafting Jonathan Isaac wasn’t the problem. Resigning a natural PF in Gordon to a four year deal rather than trading him away for a more natural wing or guard after they picked him was the problem.
Drafting Chuma Okeke wasn’t the problem. Signing Aminu for the full MLE after they picked him was the problem.
What concerns me about this front office the most is they seem very unwilling to move off of their own decisions.
It’s perfectly ok to resign someone just for the sake of having them as a trade asset later.