RealGM

Bensational wrote:

BlueBlazer wrote:

Bensational wrote:
Who said anything about obligation? I just said "want".

My point remains the same. Why want that?

Why want to see someone do well even if they're not on my team? I suppose it's because I'm not an utter douchebag. How's that answer for you?

I mean, that should be like the 99th reason down the list of why we’d move him. Secure incoming value first, worry about our team priorities, and THEN worry about the positives of a fresh start for AG. It’s a cutthroat business—I don’t even “kinda” want to see him moved for anything other than an advantageous haul for us.

BlueBlazer wrote:

Bensational wrote:

BlueBlazer wrote:My point remains the same. Why want that?

Why want to see someone do well even if they're not on my team? I suppose it's because I'm not an utter douchebag. How's that answer for you?

I mean, that should be like the 99th reason down the list of why we’d move him. Secure incoming value first, worry about our team priorities, and THEN worry about the positives of a fresh start for AG. It’s a cutthroat business—I don’t even “kinda” want to see him moved for anything other than an advantageous haul for us.

Look man, you've just gone and fabricated your own argument. Wanting to see AG (or Vuc, or Fournier) do well regardless of what team he plays on isn't mutually exclusive to wanting to see my own team do well.

Even if he's traded to a bad situation in a deal that benefits us, I still want to see him do well. Though, WeHam do seem to try to do right by the players, which can only be good for the rep of the team.

Rainwater wrote:

yoyojw17 wrote:

basketballRob wrote:

Read on Twitter

?s=19

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app

Gordon + #15 for reddish + #6.... i'll take it.

Yeah, that is not happening. If you are going to **** the hawks at least take them out to dinner first, lol.

lol.... wasn't even gonna use a rubber. hahah

?s=21

UnFadeable21 wrote:

Read on Twitter

?s=21

So basically they still may or may not trade him.

Weltman is the master of saying nothing while saying something.

yoyojw17 wrote:

Rainwater wrote:

yoyojw17 wrote:Gordon + #15 for reddish + #6.... i'll take it.

Yeah, that is not happening. If you are going to **** the hawks at least take them out to dinner first, lol.

lol.... wasn't even gonna use a rubber. hahah

Hahahahaha

UnFadeable21 wrote:

Read on Twitter

?s=21

I feel like the magic have always been trying to trade him but they never do. I remember his name being on the white board incident, lol.

?s=21

UnFadeable21 wrote:

Read on Twitter

?s=21

Lol, he wasn't signed before? So he wasn't getting paid all this time?

Rainwater wrote:

UnFadeable21 wrote:

Read on Twitter

?s=21

Lol, he wasn't signed before? So he wasn't getting paid all this time?

Since he tore his knee, they gave him a g league contract instead last season.

Rainwater wrote:

UnFadeable21 wrote:

Read on Twitter

?s=21

Lol, he wasn't signed before? So he wasn't getting paid all this time?

He was signed to a G-League contract I believe.

Oh, I see. Thanks for letting me know guys.

Rainwater wrote:

UnFadeable21 wrote:

Read on Twitter

?s=21

Lol, he wasn't signed before? So he wasn't getting paid all this time?

G- league with some perks (like being able to train in Orlando). There were some rumors he was loaned money. SO that means he was living an NBA ballers life-style even at Lakeland.


..

?s=21

yoyojw17 wrote:

basketballRob wrote:

Read on Twitter

?s=19

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app

Gordon + #15 for reddish + #6.... i'll take it.

I'd rather ask for Hunter. He obviously probably won't be Kawhi but he gives me vibes of him. Reddish just doesn't seem to have the fire to me, plays well below his talent for whatever reason.

https://www.blazersedge.com/2020/11/17/21572013/aaron-gordon-trade-rumors-robert-covington-portland-trail-blazers-nba-2020

According to this article... For those that discussed the haul that houston got for Robert covington.... And those that said the AG wouldn't get as much.... Apparently this package was initially offered to orlando and they said "nah". So.... Let's see where they do value AG at and what they would accept... If they do so.

2 first-round picks and an expiring contract seems like decent value for Aaron Gordon. It'll be interesting to compare whatever receive for Gordon in a potential trade to what they turned down.

Could Orl be trying to get in on one of these star moves as the third wheel and are keeping Gordon for that?

Def Swami wrote:2 first-round picks and an expiring contract seems like decent value for Aaron Gordon. It'll be interesting to compare whatever receive for Gordon in a potential trade to what they turned down.

If we trade him at all, which I do not expect at this point.

He’s are only forward that isn’t injured and can actually play. I would be surprised if we traded him.